1/3
3 Years of Service
Any stalking or revenge porn charge in Australia will involve a real person and so far we really have no information on them. Other than his local paper, the case has been largely ignored by the rest of the media and the stalking and revenge porn charges have only been mentioned in the local media recently. I doubt we will hear anything about the case in Australian media until his sentencing on 26 August(Quoting a post from the game's main thread here, to avoid getting bopped by moderators for going technically off-topic.)
Well, I am curious to see what the stalking and revenge porn charges are about. A few weeks ago, I got to thinking that, given that Australia treats fictional erotica with underage people (or with an underage appearance) the same as if they were real people..... Are the stalking and revenge porn targets also against fictional children? The mention of a "hidden camera" (I don't recall the exact phrasing) got me thinking further: The viewpoint in a 3D rendering software is technically referred to as a camera, and it's a "hidden" one (you don't actually see a physical camera). Revenge porn is mainly pornographic content made without the target's consent (and a fictional person can't actually give consent).
And yes, any country that treats sexual acts with fictional depictions of children (even virtual ones; either drawn or 3D modeled) the same as if they were real-life children, those are some f-ed up laws. Especially since fictional depictions of incest, violence, murder, and abuse aren't given the same treatment.
But the main problem now is fighting such laws, in particular after they've already been implemented. You'll just end up being the next target of investigation under those laws.