I believe AI is the new generation (lol) of Porn, anything you can think off can be created. Although it is not very nice for the actors and actresses they will lose their jobs. Also the AI models are probably trained on images and porn from the past so the future porn will become more of the same. Also the people probably did not get paid to have their images and video's used for AI training. But that is an other story.
Re: folks losing their jobs: okay, that's an interesting angle I hadn't considered at all. With again, hardly any thought put towards the subject at the moment, I don't (immiediately) see Live-Action actors as a sector which will be **majorly** affected. I could be wrong, tho.
Traditionally-created Drawn/CGI porn artists, tho? Yeah, THAT sector I can see losing a LOT of work to AI, and while I'm never a fan of artists losing work, is IS here where I feel kinda split and haven't figured out how I feel about it. The split comes when I think about the other side of it: devs and authors who have a great game idea and can code it/write it, but can't afford to pay/ can't find an artist to make the accompanying art. AI gives them another option, which I'm a fan of. Ultimately, tho, I **think** I've more emapathy for the artists.
Re: AI-Gen Porn (AIGP) itself: The way AIGP is made, specifically by training on existing images, makes
incredibly wary of AIGP (ESPECIALLY anything photo-realistic) because I don't know from where the AI is drawing its sources. As far as I know there's no way for a third-party consumer to know, at least not easily or in passing. I'm by no means a legal scholar, but I can easily see big potential for AIGP made from being trained on photographs of real people to become a major legal problem for both producers and consumers. Especially if such laws are drafted by people who have no idea about the subject they're legislating.