discussion Animation or still images

[moodss]

nice images are better than bad animation

 

[JustAnotherLurker]

nice images are better than bad animation

this

 

[Jubjub]

I think that using animated characters is generally better. Live2D is especially good when we're talking about characters being shown casually on screen. I do think that this is something that isn't completely necessary, however.

 

[LuqhsA07]

Definitely prefer the animations. However I would put sex sounds almost as important on the list. If I'm playing a game without sound I'll generally put on sexy asmr in the background.

I would have to give that a try

 

[Vlbc]

It depends on the quality of the animation.

"My Best Deal" have awesome and fluid animation sex scenes.

"The Guardian" animation scenes are absolutely horrible.

 

[MihoTakumi]

Honestly I do not care much about animations, sure they're great addition if done right, but to me personally if the game is good, it's not necessary to be animated.

 

[illEndline]

I prefer that games have animation, but there's still some non-animated games that include gorgeous artwork and/or voice acting

True sometimes animations make games dev cycle last too long

 

[illEndline]

Honestly I do not care much about animations, sure they're great addition if done right, but to me personally if the game is good, it's not necessary to be animated.

So true some games have been ruined by animations just from increased dev time alonen

 

[illEndline]

Games without animation, if the graphics are good, are excellent. When there is animation, often the body of the characters is quite well done, but in several games, the face lacks emotion and that spoils all the interest.

I hate when the movement is too static like it's on hinges

 

[gino2000]

image

 

[Tosser]

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[pervy_phoenix69]

animations are great if they are well made and blend in like being a DIK ore Summer`s Gone
but i prefer just images over some half ass shaky image animations most devs do

 

[stevie]

Animations are fantastic but I can do without them, I would expect faster output from creators who don't have animations though.

 

[okok42690]

I feel like animation is a cheat code because you can make some really great stills that does the same as an animation, but that takes alot of skill, so its generally easier to just go with an animation. because expressing an action with a video is much easier than a still image. (obv animating is way harder than just drawing one image, but its easier to get a way with is what I'm trying to say)

 

[mojoyoyo]

Stills are great but animation is better in my book

 

[kenny86]

Good animations > Good stills > Bad animations.
Making good animations is hard and takes much longer, and if the artist doesn't go for the needed effort you get something terrible instead of good enough still

 

[solarjohn]

i would say Good animations > Good stills > Bad stills> Bad animations.
bad animations are goofy or a turn off

 

[accobra427]

i would say Good animations > Good stills > Bad stills> Bad animations.
bad animations are goofy or a turn off

Yes i´v would say the same, i´m just waiting for an AI generator to do animations as good as pictures

 

[piccorri]

if its well optimised, give me animation. Otherwise dont bother

 

[gertbert11]

Images are the basis for the animations, which can be changed at any time.