Anti-Social & Lurker - Hideout spot

  • Thread starter Thread starter Axois
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 174K
  • Views Views 7M
0.00 star(s) No ratings yet
Good morning and happy Caturday.
You must be registered to see attachments
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
I will say, i kind of feel like it is overhyped because of a couple main reasons.

GTA games were so groundbreaking because of their pushing of the mature rating of video games. They had sex, drugs, violence (against police, which was pretty unheard of), and actual nudity. All of this attached to a fun game. However I feel as tho 6 is going to suffer from what a lot of games do these days, and thats american censorship. If you look at a game like Conan Exiles, it had nudity in it, but in the US it was basically half censored. A lot of games are just straight up afraid to put nudity in their games. I was very surprised by baulders gate 3 having as much as it did and being as succesful as it was. So the things that made GTA stand out as unique, isnt going to be as ground breaking this many iterations in.

In addition, GTA 5 had a very long and succesful run. GTA online was fun, at first, but then it suffered really bad from microtransactions, cheating, and creating such an awful grind it felt like a real job. Will they learn from this in 6 when online mode inevitably happens? Time will tell.

Now im not saying it wont be a good/fun game. I think it will be, but I do think it will be overhyped. It is 3rd person so in my personal opinion it will at least be better then cyberpunk. (I tried to like that game many times, just cant do it stuck in 1st person for the entirety of a game that isnt a FPS.)
What makes me have little to no interest in gta6 is that it's going to be as handholdy/formulaic like most AAA games are nowadays, however I can see a casual audience still love the game tbh. If anything it'll for sure have high production value, which for many is a selling point on it's own I'd say.
 
What makes me have little to no interest in gta6 is that it's going to be as handholdy/formulaic like most AAA games are nowadays, however I can see a casual audience still love the game tbh. If anything it'll for sure have high production value, which for many is a selling point on it's own I'd say.
All high budget games always end up favouring the lowest common denominator. I would assume its to do with investor/publisher pressure to reduce risk, but regardless its why most AAA games feel hollow nowadays. It sucks, but a lot of people who play games arent "gamers" so they dont look for anything that makes them think or gives them any sort of challenge, they're just after the spectacle of it all
 
In the end it's about management on the long run (about GTA6). To have a game come out in a finished state with most of promises kept is already something rare nowadays, but the real trial will be about the multiplayer, and politics of the editor / studio about modding

A solo campaign has an end, you can do it multiple times at most, but a time eventually comes when pretty much everything except 2 or 3 easter eggs have been discovered and shared with everyone

Multiplayer on the other hand, and the potential mods that come with it has an infinite potential. (ofc you can also have mods for the solo but you get what i mean)

I am actively playing a game right now that went out more than 20 years ago (jedi academy w the moviebattles 2 overhaul mod), still has a devoted player base and a team that takes care about the mod, still updating it as of today
I never understood the hype for things like GTA. I guess sandboxy stuff just doesn't do it for me. The campaign doesn't justify the price. I can see how people like RP though, it seems entertaining enough.
 
I never understood the hype for things like GTA. I guess sandboxy stuff just doesn't do it for me. The campaign doesn't justify the price. I can see how people like RP though, it seems entertaining enough.

For sure the main argument for me is the whole multpilayer thing in the end that would make it worth the price.

If it's just about the solo campaign, piracy still works very fine
 
i have 133,000 lewdcoins & nothing to do with them
Invest in bitcoin.
Do I just start one from the main page? Or is there a specific sub section that's best for me to start it in?
I don't know, but if you make a mistake, there will always be a mod to move your post to the correct section (y)
 
I use Brave, it's my main browser, but the Brave link doesn't work, the Chrome does tho, IDFK why, but I got what I needed, thanx mate
ok, strange but good that it worked, Worked too if you create a new account, that message saying it needs admin approval no longer appears... if that worked too, I'm happy.

Invest in bitcoin.

I don't know, but if you make a mistake, there will always be a mod to move your post to the correct section (y)
monero is also a cryptocurrency with more privacy
 
Ain't no way, they literally are saying that LC has REAL lolis? That's the new excuse? They can't sink any lower than making stuff like that up on the spot, it's mind-boggling.
Well, I guess I tried lol. I sense another exodus incoming
Not unless someone guides the way for the lost lambs.
 
Last edited:
Putting your accounts at risk on F95 is tiring, wouldn't it be better to have this site referenced better?

Unless this site needs to remain a hidden place to avoid pressure like F95? But as the time goes, with more and more people coming, it will be a problem to be adressed eventually

Or one tricky way to advertise the site on F95 would be to make a top tier h game with innocent references to LC in it lol
 
Putting your accounts at risk on F95 is tiring, wouldn't it be better to have this site referenced better?

Unless this site needs to remain a hidden place to avoid pressure like F95? But as the time goes, with more and more people coming, it will be a problem to be adressed eventually

Or one tricky way to advertise the site on F95 would be to make a top tier h game with innocent references to LC in it lol
f95 would ban it, if you all only knew how much money that sites makes per year you'd realize they are protecting their bottom line.

if you love f95 as much as I do you'd install a few adblockers & encourage everyone to do the same.
under the guise of not getting malware from download sites of course, f95 would remove those who said:
"by installing adblockers you remove f95's ability to make ad revenue"
 
Putting your accounts at risk on F95 is tiring, wouldn't it be better to have this site referenced better?
I wouldn't have recommended getting involved in that conversation with your main account; as you've probably noticed, they're very sensitive and get passive-aggressive at the slightest criticism.

That said, there's no way to refer to the site without putting your account at risk. The safest way I can think of so far is to send a simple JPG to the PMs of the unhappy users, like the one in blue text in my signature.
Unless this site needs to remain a hidden place to avoid pressure like F95? But as the time goes, with more and more people coming, it will be a problem to be adressed eventually
As I've said before, yes, it's inevitable for several reasons, and that thread made me wonder what Jack is doing about the hosting issues. If the site's growth means it has to shut down, then I'd rather it stay as it is.
Or one tricky way to advertise the site on F95 would be to make a top tier h game with innocent references to LC in it lol
That's actually something I've had in mind for a long time, to make a game that literally has a message like the LonaRPG intro but with F95 and LC, or where you have to reach a certain point to see the reference so it goes under the rug without getting banned.

That thread made me realize something I didn't want to believe, that, to them, pixels are equivalent to CSAM. They're the kind of people who can't tell reality from fiction, which is why they accuse LC of containing CSAM. It's sad and regrettable that F95 is being run by people like that, it really doesn't deserve the traffic it gets.

I also noticed some inconsistencies and incoherencies that I could point out, and I haven’t even read half the thread yet. It’s hard for me to do so because reading such arrogant people is unnerving, and it makes me want to pay them a visit to see if they can really maintain the same attitude when faced with the element lead on the periodic table (this is not a death threat or anything like that) or if they’re just keyboard warriors, but if I were to point out every ridiculous thing said there, I’d be writing for half the day, and I don’t think it’s worth it either, considering we all already know who they are and how they act.

If you're thinking, “That's going too far,” I'm sorry, but I'm a passionate person and I can be harsh toward those who think they're better than others.
 
f95 would ban it, if you all only knew how much money that sites makes per year you'd realize they are protecting their bottom line.

if you love f95 as much as I do you'd install a few adblockers & encourage everyone to do the same.
under the guise of not getting malware from download sites of course, f95 would remove those who said:
"by installing adblockers you remove f95's ability to make ad revenue"
I recommend a network level ad-blocker. There are many solution for this, I can recommend a few if you'd like. That way you don't need to install on each device, your home network is already running an ad blocker
 
Back
Top Bottom