Anti-Social & Lurker - Hideout spot

  • Thread starter Thread starter Axois
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 175K
  • Views Views 8M
Well. After tonights wonderful debates... I think I am going to go to bed.

I have written extensive essays on here. Not sure to whom it was the benefit of. But hopefully someone gets something from my words.

But, most of all, I feel sorry for the Backreaders who have to read it all...
So, I will offer them a gift...

You must be registered to see attachments
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
I'd cast denzel as white denzel. White face and black face are equally amusing to me. Probably because it upsets people.
I think I remember there was 'uproar' within the story in the movie Tropic Thunder regarding RDJ's character doing a form of black-face in order to be cast for that particular role in the film they were making but was there any sort of real world controversy about it? I don't know.
 
Hello, my Favourite French!
Do you mind if I get stuck into this conversation you and @matthiacallus are having?
Well, you don't have much choice... Because...

You must be registered to see attachments


I wnat to critique your comment from a little while ago, which my brain forgot, but this reply where you've lovingly included me now reminds me of.

Ahem.



So... I disagree with this. Absolutely.
And I think it's a little disingenuous.
Not on purpose! But, hear me out.

Unless we're not looking beyond Disney films or Popcorn flicks, there are plenty of films wher the 21st Century Storytelling Villain isn't a clown.
Speaking of an actual clown - Joker. In Dark Knight Rises. Just came to me. But good example.

The problem isn't 21st Century Sensibilities, its 21st Century Capitalism with a relience on lowest common denominator, created by committee, nepotist hires. It's films that are badly made and badly written. Good films, good villains, are still being written.

You list Marvel fucking up Doom. Did they fuck up Thanos? Thanos WON. He was not a clown in the slightest.
And that's firmly 21st Century, even firmly Disney. And that's a good villain right there.
This is why I said Disigenuous, by the way. Since the same company that ruined Thawn, gave us a good Thanos. In the same Century.
And, even so, the original Star Wars was pretty clownish with it's villains anyway. Thawn was only ever good in the EU - comics and books etc - where characters tend to be more nuanced anyway as pages give more space to breathe.

The problem isn't "lets water down the villains" the problem is "lets hire shit writers who don't know how to write a villain".
And then, there's the other debate... People often don't understand the difference between Hero/Villain Protagonist/Antagonist.

What about Wolf of Wallstreet? Protagonist WAS the Villain. This is a film that also came out in 21st Century.

So, my point, in a very tired and rambling and overly verbose manner. Is that I think blaming a cultural shift towards "clownlike" villains is incorrect. I think it only fuels culture war rhetoric, because it's the kind of stuff people latch onto - "we can't have villains anymore, people are too soft" - etc. We can. We do. It's just that many of the biggest films right now are not exactly written for complex nuances. It's not hard C Culture, it's hard C Capitalism.



Haha. Again, this was in a fictional future where we have complete and total Equity amongst all on earth!
A lot of good points. Like really good. But about Thanos... I gotta do this... I'm sorry. I'm very sorry:
You must be registered to see attachments

Thanos... did NOT win.
He won the first match, and LOST in the finals. Yes. Yes. The world got changed a bit. But overall, it was back to normal. If you consider that winning, I can't stop you.

Insight into my mind: Thanos winning would have been... it sticks. It's there. Half the universe is destroyed. In the MCU, the Earth has 4 Billion people. Not 8. THAT would have calmed me down for almost a decade!
But it didn't happen. Thanos was dusted. 99.9% of the heroes survived. A day ending in Y for the good worshipping population.
Sucks to be me that I'm evil.

Your points are very valid, I'll admit. I can't comment on Wolf of Wallstreet. It seems to a story based on reality, not that it had had to have happened. I assume that like, in Breaking Bad
The villain loses and dies in the end. Or maybe jail. And if not, if he wins as per my definition, like WIN win and it sticks, I might give it a watch.

My version of villain protagonist winning: The villain wins, achieves all their goals, end of franchise, no heroic come back, then end. i.e. Vader kills Luke. Becomes the Emperor. The Empire kills all the rebels. The end. CREDITS.

And yes... I know... it would lose SO MUCH MONEY...💵💵💵
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Well. After tonights wonderful debates... I think I am going to go to bed.

I have written extensive essays on here. Not sure to whom it was the benefit of. But hopefully someone gets something from my words.

But, most of all, I feel sorry for the Backreaders who have to read it all...
So, I will offer them a gift...

You must be registered to see attachments
You lied to me! I thought you were sleeping!
You must be registered to see attachments
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
But does their race really play a role in this?
Borders have been crossed from the moment we started moving around this planet.
And let's use your Julias Ceasar example - the Romans didn't really have a concept of "Race" so much as they had a concept of "Culture". People were often identified by their place of origin, language, customs, or religion rather than by physical characteristics alone. Compare that to our idea of Race now. Where, a Black American, is treated differently than just "an American".
So, the ideal person to play Julias Ceasar is... Someone of Roman Culture...

The reason I used Martin Luther King as an example, is because the great bredth of his story and lifes work was related to the colour of his skin and the treatment of the ethnic minority surrounding him. A minority that was fresh out of slavery and still dealing with the ramifaction of having very few rights and very poor standards of living. Being black was important in this context.

For someone like Julias Ceasar, being Black, doesn't matter.
He can BE Black, just like he can be any other shade under the sun, it doesn't matter to who Julias Ceasar was.
If it's a historical movie or series then yes, as he was who he was, and that can not be changed. If it's something that does not follow an historical setting then I don't have any issue with him being played by a black actor, as long as they do it right and stay away from political statements.

The "Historically Accurate" Cleopatra was panned by everyone. It was widely regarded as an absolutely shockingly shit move and just part of Smiths ongoing delusion she calls a life. Smith was trying to push an agenda, I agree, it was part of her own, imagined, personal Black Empowerment, but even Black Critics disowned it. Smith is just a complete and utter idiot.
They only tried to rectify after a lot of backslash received trough social media, not all of them, but enough to see the hypocrisy behind a lot of certain groups and people.
 
A lot of good points. Like really good. But about Thanos... I gotta do this... I'm sorry. I'm very sorry:
You must be registered to see attachments

Thanos... did NOT win.
He won the first match, and LOST in the finals. Yes. Yes. The world got changed a bit. But overall, it was back to normal. If you consider that winning, I can't stop you.
What are you talking about? Thanos won the first and only match. Infinity war was the conclusion of the Marvel universe and there has been no new movies since.
You must be registered to see attachments
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
I think the Simarillion is not intended to be a novel, but a sort of "historical chronicle". It mimics the style of king annals and that kind of books. Is not an style easy to digest. But yeah, I agree. If it had been published today it would probably be in the form of an encyclopedia or handbook.
All this time I thought Silmarillion was was a Bible that Hobbits read. :unsure:
 
I've not read the whole genesis, but it's also more than 10 pages. It's about the creation of the world, its early history and the origin of the first people AKA silmarilion. True, maybe mimic is not the best word in this case, but is the only one that comes to mind.
You must be registered to see attachments
If you are right, you are right. I thought the Genesis was just the first chapter of the Old Testament, but I see the Genesis has 49 more XD
In my poor defense I will only say that I am not a Christian, just a blasphemous atheist.
 
So... I disagree with this. Absolutely.
And I think it's a little disingenuous.
Not on purpose! But, hear me out.

Unless we're not looking beyond Disney films or Popcorn flicks, there are plenty of films wher the 21st Century Storytelling Villain isn't a clown.
Speaking of an actual clown - Joker. In Dark Knight Rises. Just came to me. But good example.

The problem isn't 21st Century Sensibilities, its 21st Century Capitalism with a relience on lowest common denominator, created by committee, nepotist hires. It's films that are badly made and badly written. Good films, good villains, are still being written.

You list Marvel fucking up Doom. Did they fuck up Thanos? Thanos WON. He was not a clown in the slightest.
And that's firmly 21st Century, even firmly Disney. And that's a good villain right there.
This is why I said Disigenuous, by the way. Since the same company that ruined Thawn, gave us a good Thanos. In the same Century.
And, even so, the original Star Wars was pretty clownish with it's villains anyway. Thawn was only ever good in the EU - comics and books etc - where characters tend to be more nuanced anyway as pages give more space to breathe.

The problem isn't "lets water down the villains" the problem is "lets hire shit writers who don't know how to write a villain".
And then, there's the other debate... People often don't understand the difference between Hero/Villain Protagonist/Antagonist.

What about Wolf of Wallstreet? Protagonist WAS the Villain. This is a film that also came out in 21st Century.

So, my point, in a very tired and rambling and overly verbose manner. Is that I think blaming a cultural shift towards "clownlike" villains is incorrect. I think it only fuels culture war rhetoric, because it's the kind of stuff people latch onto - "we can't have villains anymore, people are too soft" - etc. We can. We do. It's just that many of the biggest films right now are not exactly written for complex nuances. It's not hard C Culture, it's hard C Capitalism.



Haha. Again, this was in a fictional future where we have complete and total Equity amongst all on earth!

Going to try to join this one.

It's a bit of slavery to the dollar, no? People pay to be entertained, and that doesn't always take the most high brow writing. People who churn content go where the money is.

There are some shows, movies, characters, and villains that have come out in the past few years that are downright genius. Some movies only contain a villain in order to provide a platform for the hero to act heroically. That's a relatively simple function. If they have complex plans, it is only to help the hero's heroics be even more impressive. That's different from creating a true villain, who has motivations that we can understand and even somewhat align with from the darker side of ourselves (vis a vis Wolf of Wall Street).

You know what I have noticed though... a lot of the "good" writing seems to have shifted to episodic series from movies. I know everyone pupu's on Netflix but some of those series are downright spectacular. The good writers are out there, they just aren't as dominant in the hollywood blockbuster releases.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
No, is about mediocre products made by mediocre people/companies that try to push an agenda through means that shouldn't be politicied.
But, Disney didn't make Little Mermaid political. They hired a black actress to play a fictional character.
The terminally online culture warrior idiots made it political by saying a black Ariel is bad (or disrespectful or historically inaccurate)
Haha. Again, this was in a fictional future where we have complete and total Equity amongst all on earth!
If that's the case I would pick a good actor. Like Rami Malek
She was Greek/Macedonian, I believe.
We don't actually know who her mother was. Just educated guesses.
I am not a Christian, just a blasphemous atheist.
It's better that way. You don't have to have you r beliefs interfere with reality or basic facts. :P
 
did you try e-hentai? I made a quick random search(no filters outside of portuguese) and got almost 20k matches. Picking only doujinshi got over a thousand, doujinshi and manga over 10k.
there probably more translated, and non English works there than anyother website I know of.
 
A lot of good points. Like really good. But about Thanos... I gotta do this... I'm sorry. I'm very sorry:
You must be registered to see attachments

Thanos... did NOT win.
He won the first match, and LOST in the finals. Yes. Yes. The world got changed a bit. But overall, it was back to normal. If you consider that winning, I can't stop you.

Insight into my mind: Thanos winning would have been... it sticks. It's there. Half the universe is destroyed. In the MCU, the Earth has 4 Billion people. Not 8. THAT would have calmed me down for almost a decade!
But it didn't happen. Thanos was dusted. 99.9% of the heroes survived. A day ending in Y for the good worshipping population.
Sucks to be me that I'm evil.

Your points are very valid, I'll admit. I can't comment on Wolf of Wallstreet. It seems to a story based on reality, not that it had had to have happened. I assume that like, in Breaking Bad
The villain loses and dies in the end. Or maybe jail. And if not, if he wins as per my definition, like WIN win and it sticks, I might give it a watch.

My version of villain protagonist winning: The villain wins, achieves all their goals, end of franchise, no heroic come back, then end. i.e. Vader kills Luke. Becomes the Emperor. The Empire kills all the rebels. The end. CREDITS.

And yes... I know... it would lose SO MUCH MONEY...💵💵💵

just-when-i-thought-i-was-out-they-pull-me-back-in.gif


Luvgames... I was about to go to bed. I did a whole "Good night" post and everything... Could you not have waited ten minutes? Who am I? @mime? Who can't leave for the life of him?

Anyway... Right. Let's do this...
Thanos DID win. He retired, happily ever after on his little moon garden.
A Younger, Less Experienced Thanos lost, when he got cocky and jumped through timetravel wormholes.
They're two different characters.

Putting that nerdy little debate aside. (Which, for the record, I really enjoy and when I'm less tired I'd totally go to town on haha).

Your idea of a Villain winning is "End of Franchise"? That would be one of the greatest works of Post-Modern film making, haha. That's a full "drop the mic" moment. And I would LIVE for it. DC should have done it to kill off their Universe... But anyway...
Let's get real a second.
Within your idea of a Villain winning... You would need the world, the universe, the space time continuum to be absolutely utterly obliterated. You're basically saying "I don't want there to be the possibility of any other stories". Why? Because "any other stories" runs the risk of overturning the the "Villains Win"

If we treat the MCU, the Franchise, as a Continuum of stories. Thanos did Win in his story.
Just... Well... Time moves on, and another story happens. Just so happens that in this one the Heroes then won.
It's you who is deciding what is a Match and what is a Final. To him, it was the Final. What he did was reversed, yes. But at what cost? Time, Effort, Lives, Psychological Trauma, Real World Catastrophe, etc.
Not to mention it was, as Doctor Strange establishes, 1 Chance in 14,000,605. We, the viewer, just so happen to be watching that story get told.

Just like in life, where we win today and lose tomorrow. Where we find a $1 on the floor, but then get overcharged for that coffee and can't be bothered to complain. The worlds don't stop. The stories don't stop. The only thing that stops would be the win to end all wins - the absolute destruction of the Universe, whether as part of the story, or whether at a Meta Level where the Franchise just stops and no more stories can be told.
 
Hey peeps.

7 AM. I might fucked my sleeping schedule...
 
just-when-i-thought-i-was-out-they-pull-me-back-in.gif


Luvgames... I was about to go to bed. I did a whole "Good night" post and everything... Could you not have waited ten minutes? Who am I? @mime? Who can't leave for the life of him?

Anyway... Right. Let's do this...
Thanos DID win. He retired, happily ever after on his little moon garden.
A Younger, Less Experienced Thanos lost, when he got cocky and jumped through timetravel wormholes.

Putting that nerdy little debate aside. (Which, for the record, I really enjoy and when I'm less tired I'd totally go to town on haha).

Your idea of a Villain winning is "End of Franchise"? That would be one of the greatest works of Post-Modern film making, haha. That's a full "drop the mic" moment. And I would LIVE for it. DC should have done it to kill off their Universe... But anyway...
Let's get real a second.
Within your idea of a Villain winning... You would need the world, the universe, the space time continuum to be absolutely utterly obliterated. You're basically saying "I don't want there to be the possibility of any other stories". Why? Because "any other stories" runs the risk of overturning the the "Villains Win"

If we treat the MCU, the Franchise, as a Continuum of stories. Thanos did Win in his story.
Just... Well... Time moves on, and another story happens. Just so happens that in this one the Heroes then won.
It's you who is deciding what is a Match and what is a Final. To him, it was the Final. What he did was reversed, yes. But at what cost? Time, Effort, Lives, Psychological Trauma, Real World Catastrophe, etc.
Not to mention it was, as Doctor Strange establishes, 1 Chance in 14,000,605. We, the viewer, just so happen to be watching that story get told.

Just like in life, where we win today and lose tomorrow. Where we find a $1 on the floor, but then get overcharged for that coffee and can't be bothered to complain. The worlds don't stop. The stories don't stop. The only thing that stops would be the win to end all wins - the absolute destruction of the Universe, whether as part of the story, or whether at a Meta Level where the Franchise just stops and no more stories can be told.
Nah he lived like a bitch and died like a bitch. He had a dumbass stupid justification and with all the power all he could think of is that dumb ass ash people.
He won stupidest guy that had the power of the gods in his hands yet uses it the most idiotic way to solve the problem he believes exist.
 
She was Greek/Macedonian, I believe.
Correct and part of the Ptolemy dynasty, the progenitor of which was once one of Alexander the Greats generals I believe. Funny fact but she was her brother Ptolemy XIII's wife so a game based on her life would fit in well here, as well as being considered educational.
 
Last edited:
Just like in life, where we win today and lose tomorrow. Where we find a $1 on the floor, but then get overcharged for that coffee and can't be bothered to complain. The worlds don't stop. The stories don't stop. The only thing that stops would be the win to end all wins - the absolute destruction of the Universe, whether as part of the story, or whether at a Meta Level where the Franchise just stops and no more stories can be told.

Hey peeps.

7 AM. I might fucked my sleeping schedule...
Are you waking up or going to sleep?
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Back
Top Bottom