me too, wanna play some snake and ladders, the only og game
sure dnd and other games have their characteristics and is amazing
but id prefer this or probably a fist fight on monopoly mortgage anytime lmao
The double pair of tits of the cow women are a good idea, but the execution not so much. I think they should be more attached and not that much separated. Something like this (I copy/pasted the tits, the original has only one pair).
People don't like villains! That's why they're villains.
I want a good villains in my stories, too. But, I want them to lose at the end. I can assure you, I am not a puritanical.
Human nature, I guess
Fair. That means I'm not people then... and that's ok.
I want villains to win. In games I play, or stories I wrote (that are too awful to even self publish), it's villain protagonists... WINNING.
FYI, I called my cheating ex- a lot of insults. My worst one... technically... is G-Rated. "You are nothing... but a... HUMAN BEING!" She knew the level of emotion behind that statement.
That said, I understand that I'm in the minority. And I really do hope that you can enjoy lots of villains losing at the end. That just won't ever be me.
Maybe it's just me, but the Silmarillion never felt like a book.
It felt like the Star Trek "bible" they supposedly had in classic Trek and TNG that summarized all the stuff that happened to keep things straight.
Meaning: someone tried to turn "Silmarillion the reference manual" into an actual book.
I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm saying what it felt like.
The same applies to the the historical figures that I mentioned, every one played a military or political major role in their respective country or nation and to change them would miss the whole point of who they were and what they did, as I had already mentioned they were historical figures.
But does their race really play a role in this?
Borders have been crossed from the moment we started moving around this planet.
And let's use your Julias Ceasar example - the Romans didn't really have a concept of "Race" so much as they had a concept of "Culture". People were often identified by their place of origin, language, customs, or religion rather than by physical characteristics alone. Compare that to our idea of Race now. Where, a Black American, is treated differently than just "an American".
So, the ideal person to play Julias Ceasar is... Someone of Roman Culture...
The reason I used Martin Luther King as an example, is because the great bredth of his story and lifes work was related to the colour of his skin and the treatment of the ethnic minority surrounding him. A minority that was fresh out of slavery and still dealing with the ramifaction of having very few rights and very poor standards of living. Being black was important in this context.
For someone like Julias Ceasar, being Black, doesn't matter.
He can BE Black, just like he can be any other shade under the sun, it doesn't matter to who Julias Ceasar was.
However, taking for example Cleopatra that was advertised as "historically accurate" and then they proceeded to make the opossite ruins the whole point, as I remember that there was a lot of Egyptians complaining about it, saying that they were being stolen of their identity in favor to push a political agenda.
The "Historically Accurate" Cleopatra was panned by everyone. It was widely regarded as an absolutely shockingly shit move and just part of Smiths ongoing delusion she calls a life. Smith was trying to push an agenda, I agree, it was part of her own, imagined, personal Black Empowerment, but even Black Critics disowned it. Smith is just a complete and utter idiot.
Haha. It'll be the same crowd as "All Lives Matter" and "Not All Men".
People don't understand the nuance. Or, they just choose to ignore it because it makes them uncomfortable... Or, because it doesn't serve their purposes...
Yeah, sorry about that- I have "necro-lepsy"...
Here's the name (I'm sure someone else may have answered it by now).
My Life in a Fantasy Kingdom [LK1.69EXTRA Public]
Looks alright, but seems to be not for me. I wish it had smoother animations with sound (not just sloppy wet sounds but also moaning). I mean, i don't mind stills (or a couple of them stitched together for an animation), i even like to look at them, but if i play one handed, its not enough for me. Might be stingy of me, but i guess thats just my taste
I think the Simarillion is not intended to be a novel, but a sort of "historical chronicle". It mimics the style of king annals and that kind of books. Is not an style easy to digest. But yeah, I agree. If it had been published today it would probably be in the form of an encyclopedia or handbook.
I think the Simarillion is not intended to be a novel, but a sort of "historical chronicle". It mimics the style of king annals and that kind of books. Is not an style easy to digest. But yeah, I agree. If it had been published today it would probably be in the form of an encyclopedia or handbook.
If they're trying to make a historical movie, I think you should use someone of the same or similar race, sure.
But, if it's a fantastical story with someone who has the name Julius Cesar, Cleopatra or Joan of Arc, then who gives a shit?
Do you think the King Edward from the show My Lady Jane is disrespectful because he is a black actor?
More or less disrespectful than the fact that PEOPLE CHANGE INTO ANIMALS IN THE SHOW?
If it's a movie/game/series based on historical facts then they should adhere to those historical facts, if they are trying to make something different then it shouldn't be a problem.
I don't know why you try to make it sound as I have something against black people, that has never been the issue, it's just the hypocrisy of some people, as I remember there was some problems with the cleopatra series in nertflix, that was portrayed as "historically accurate" but it was not, it even came to the point that a lawyer filed a complaint accusing the series of violating media laws and of attempting to: "distort and erase Egyptian identity".
Fair. That means I'm not people then... and that's ok.
I want villains to win. In games I play, or stories I wrote (that are too awful to even self publish), it's villain protagonists... WINNING.
FYI, I called my cheating ex- a lot of insults. My worst one... technically... is G-Rated. "You are nothing... but a... HUMAN BEING!" She knew the level of emotion behind that statement.
That said, I understand that I'm in the minority. And I really do hope that you can enjoy lots of villains losing at the end. That just won't ever be me.
Hello, my Favourite French!
Do you mind if I get stuck into this conversation you and @matthiacallus are having?
Well, you don't have much choice... Because...
You must be registered to see attachments
I wnat to critique your comment from a little while ago, which my brain forgot, but this reply where you've lovingly included me now reminds me of.
They "have to" make him a clown... otherwise someone might... I dunno... create a Galactic Empire right here on Earth or some shit.
At least that's how they behave.
I HATE IT. Let me be clear. But I've (sort of) made peace that most entertainment will fuck over villains in any story to appease the puritanicals.
I can't wait to see how the Rings of Power fuck up Sauron and Marvel will fuck up Doom, RDJ or no.
So... I disagree with this. Absolutely.
And I think it's a little disingenuous.
Not on purpose! But, hear me out.
Unless we're not looking beyond Disney films or Popcorn flicks, there are plenty of films wher the 21st Century Storytelling Villain isn't a clown.
Speaking of an actual clown - Joker. In Dark Knight Rises. Just came to me. But good example.
The problem isn't 21st Century Sensibilities, its 21st Century Capitalism with a relience on lowest common denominator, created by committee, nepotist hires. It's films that are badly made and badly written. Good films, good villains, are still being written.
You list Marvel fucking up Doom. Did they fuck up Thanos? Thanos WON. He was not a clown in the slightest.
And that's firmly 21st Century, even firmly Disney. And that's a good villain right there.
This is why I said Disigenuous, by the way. Since the same company that ruined Thawn, gave us a good Thanos. In the same Century.
And, even so, the original Star Wars was pretty clownish with it's villains anyway. Thawn was only ever good in the EU - comics and books etc - where characters tend to be more nuanced anyway as pages give more space to breathe.
The problem isn't "lets water down the villains" the problem is "lets hire shit writers who don't know how to write a villain".
And then, there's the other debate... People often don't understand the difference between Hero/Villain Protagonist/Antagonist.
What about Wolf of Wallstreet? Protagonist WAS the Villain. This is a film that also came out in 21st Century.
So, my point, in a very tired and rambling and overly verbose manner. Is that I think blaming a cultural shift towards "clownlike" villains is incorrect. I think it only fuels culture war rhetoric, because it's the kind of stuff people latch onto - "we can't have villains anymore, people are too soft" - etc. We can. We do. It's just that many of the biggest films right now are not exactly written for complex nuances. It's not hard C Culture, it's hard C Capitalism.
That's actually a very good point, however there has been some cases of historical figures that were interpreted by black actors when that was not their ethnicity, some examples of that were:
Julius Cesar
Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim
Cleopatra
Joan of arc
Margaret of Anjou
(Among others)
It's like you take Tom hanks and make him play Martin Luther King, I don't support that kind of thing, and that there are people trying to justify it its what bothers me, as this has become some kind of twisted "war" being pushed by political agendas and/or radical points of views.
At the end of the day, the stupidity goes both ways.
I might get hammered by the Mods for this comment but how about all of those depictions, in art, cinema and tv of Jesus Christ as a white man, when he would quite certainly have been of Middle Eastern descent. You know the area of the world made of countries such as Israel, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Palestine, etc. If that isn't the clearest example of unconcious bias regarding the portrayal of characters/historical figures (take your pick) then I don't know what is, and in this case that bias has been in play for at least 650 years (the renaissance) and is still in play in certain areas of certain countries.
The double pair of tits of the cow women are a good idea, put the execution not so much. I think they should be more attached and not that separated. Something like this (I copy/pasted the tits, the original has only one pair).
Fair. That means I'm not people then... and that's ok.
I want villains to win. In games I play, or stories I wrote (that are too awful to even self publish), it's villain protagonists... WINNING.
FYI, I called my cheating ex- a lot of insults. My worst one... technically... is G-Rated. "You are nothing... but a... HUMAN BEING!" She knew the level of emotion behind that statement.
That said, I understand that I'm in the minority. And I really do hope that you can enjoy lots of villains losing at the end. That just won't ever be me.
The "Historically Accurate" Cleopatra was panned by everyone. It was widely regarded as an absolutely shockingly shit move and just part of Smiths ongoing delusion she calls a life. Smith was trying to push an agenda, I agree, it was part of her own, imagined, personal Black Empowerment, but even Black Critics disowned it. Smith is just a complete and utter idiot.
I think the problem was that she came out and said that Cleopatra was black.
When really, we don't actually know for sure. And also, Jada doubles down on everything when she's wrong.
I might get hammered by the Mods for this comment but how about all of those depictions, in art, cinema and tv of Jesus Christ as a white man, when he would quite certainly have been of Middle Eastern descent. You know the area of the world made of countries such as Israel, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Palestine, etc.
Don't have anything to say against that, you are right, I find it funny that people thinks that Jesus was a white man, when as you had already said, he was born in the middle east.
Maybe it's just me, but the Silmarillion never felt like a book.
It felt like the Star Trek "bible" they supposedly had in classic Trek and TNG that summarized all the stuff that happened to keep things straight.
Meaning: someone tried to turn "Silmarillion the reference manual" into an actual book.
I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm saying what it felt like.
I think the Simarillion is not intended to be a novel, but a sort of "historical chronicle". It mimics the style of king annals and that kind of books. Is not an style easy to digest. But yeah, I agree. If it had been published today it would probably be in the form of an encyclopedia or handbook.
Isn't the whole ordeal that the Tolkein estate wouldn't give up the rights to anything other than the Silmarillion and some extended appendices? Hence why Amazon are basically making Rings of Power by cobbling together the lose bits of lore they have at their dispossal? Basically agreeing with the points that it shouldn't be "adapted" but Amazon are forcing the adapation?
Or am I talking shit?
I couldn't even finish Rings of Power. Bored me to tears.
I think you mean the Ainunlindalë, the tale of the creation of the world by Eru and the story of the Ainur. That just lasts 10 pages, the Silmarilion is 490 pages book. And I don't think it "mimics" the Genesis, but it's a mishap between the Genesis and other polytheistic mythologies.
I think the problem was that she came out and said that Cleopatra was black.
When really, we don't actually know for sure. And also, Jada doubles down on everything when she's wrong.
Actually I saw some images of cowgirls with human breasts + cow breast in the belly and they are weird as fuck XD I like more a free interpretation of the cow breasts with doubling the human ones. Bill Willingham has a double paired breast race in Ironwood. I tried to find an online image, but I failed. In their drawing they are very hot (not cows, but sort of semi-giants with 4 arms if I remember correctly).
I think you mean the Ainunlindalë, the tale of the creation of the world by Eru and the story of the Ainur. That just lasts 10 pages, the Silmarilion is 490 pages book. And I don't think it "mimics" the Genesis, but it's a mishap between the Genesis and other polytheistic mythologies.
I've not read the whole genesis, but it's also more than 10 pages. It's about the creation of the world, its early history and the origin of the first people AKA silmarilion. True, maybe mimic is not the best word in this case, but is the only one that comes to mind.