discussion Anti-Social & Lurker - Hideout spot

[Teaspoon]

I feel ya on the heat man. Just look at what's coming up for me.. ugh..

You must be registered to see attachments

Yeah I'm real sick of the heat now...

I just need a polar bear-proof Wi-Fi base in Antarctica.

 

[Saturnus]

Heat index of 107 today, frickin insane. Several water breaks indeed, and i could have
stayed in my office in the a/c hanging out here. What a great decision i made.

107° at 1 PM, I had to stop digging holes and just walked away.

You should have stayed inside!

 

[Evil Surgeon]

Yeah I'm real sick of the heat now...

I just need a polar bear-proof Wi-Fi base in Antarctica.

You get that base.. I want in. We can just bring @Underlord with us and he can run interference on the polar bears for us.

And if needed.. we can feed bits of him to the polar bears.

 

[Dad70]

I will Amend my comment.
@StephanieD @Teaspoon @Silrog22 and anyone else that used an AI avatar likeness.

AI Avatars ARE ALLOWED
Stipulations:
NOT REALISTIC
NOT REAL
NOT SEXUAL
NOT NUDE
NOT YOUNG
NOT LOLI
NOT LEWD
NOT ANYTHING PERCEIVED AS QUESTIONABLE

MUST BE
CARTOONY
COLORFUL OR IN A SILLY STYLE
ETC..

FOR THOSE WITH THE IDENTITY AVATARS LIKE ME, GUZ, STEPH, SHAWN
YOU MAY GO BACK TO THOSE

ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT IF ITS OK.. ASK A MOD BEFOREHAND
​

You need to clarify the rules for AI.
Rule 7.A: Content that is generated with a program or a website that takes information from real photographs or drawn images.
Bans AI completely because all AIs are trained with real images from scratch. At least that's what I learned about AI.
Could be wrong.

 

[Teaspoon]

You get that base.. I want in. We can just bring @Underlord with us and he can un interference on the polar bears for us.

And if needed.. we can feed bits of him to the polar bears.

 

[Saturnus]

Like I said before

Poke me in the walnut!

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Safetydummy]

Hi it's me again trying to figure out what is ok to post and what is not.
So here is a scan from a card that I received as a sample from "The Art of Olivia" back in the 1980's it is not AI, it is a drawing/painting, Hope you like it.

You must be registered to see attachments

Ah, the artist formerly known as "Anybody", I presume?

Great pic! Takes me back...waaaaaay back.

 

[Flaming1]

You need to clarify the rules for AI.
Rule 7.A: Content that is generated with a program or a website that takes information from real photographs or drawn images.
Bans AI completely because all AIs are trained with real images from scratch. At least that's what I learned about AI.
Could be wrong.

Maybe they intentionally made the rules vague so they could fuck with us in an arbitrary and capricious manner. I mean, I doubt it. But maybe.

 

[-Bonk-]

I feel ya on the heat man. Just look at what's coming up for me.. ugh..

You must be registered to see attachments

Holy Hot balls in the LC universe

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Shawnchapp]

Maybe they intentionally made the rules vague so they could fuck with us in an arbitrary and capricious manner. I mean, I doubt it. But maybe.

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Safetydummy]

Hello Lewd peoples!

Hello StephanieD! How are you?

 

[BananaPrincess]

I feel ya on the heat man. Just look at what's coming up for me.. ugh..

You must be registered to see attachments

Holy crap that's hot.

Here is mine

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[whoisit]

Maybe they intentionally made the rules vague so they could fuck with us in an arbitrary and capricious manner. I mean, I doubt it. But maybe.

Yeah, the rule is so obscure. If I have a self-taught model AI is perfectly fine? How can someone prove this, send it to the mods? And how can anyone know what set of pictures a websites model is trained on? This feels so much of a headache for mods and members.

 

[TheDude14]

yeah it can be tiring, i don't have a lot of time that i can spend here so i try to backread some pages to have some context on what they are talking about, rarely read whole threads and it usually ends up confusing me even more, like the whole talk on midgets. like one moment we talk about degenerate stuff then vanilla and hand holding and we somehow end up talking about midgets

Yeah sounds like a normal day here

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Evil Surgeon]

Holy crap that's hot.

Here is mine

You must be registered to see attachments

I think it's safe to say with all our temperatures.. we're all like..

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Flaming1]

Yeah, the rule is so obscure. If I have a self-taught model AI is perfectly fine? How can someone prove this, send it to the mods? And how can anyone know what set of pictures a websites model is trained on? This feels so much of a headache for mods and members.

Yeah it's so vague it's almost like they're trying to ban ai images without admitting they're trying to ban ai images, by making things so unclear that Noone knows what's safe to post.

I'm sure that's not the issue though, the vagueness and unclarity is merely a result of a rushed process and things will surely be clarified soonish.

 

[-Bonk-]

I think it's safe to say with all our temperatures.. we're all like..

You must be registered to see attachments

Ohhh, this might be real bad news for these brothers

You must be registered to see attachments

Talk about irony

#spoononice #metallicmeltdown

 

[Xonia]

You need to clarify the rules for AI.
Rule 7.A: Content that is generated with a program or a website that takes information from real photographs or drawn images.
Bans AI completely because all AIs are trained with real images from scratch. At least that's what I learned about AI.
Could be wrong.

Ai is supposed to be trained on data is collects from PAID data. However, AI is hard to damn near impossible to prove that its information is legally taken.
So, yes, it does ban AI completely for users to post. We are just allowing AI avatars because a majority had Avatars that become identities.
Nearly all rules and regulations are vague. hardly ever will certain rules and regulations be spelt out in specifics. Reason being, people will always use it a technicality.
I can say:
I dont want people to cross my stream so i say.
"DO not walk across that stream."
Ok, people wont walk across that steam. But they will run across it, they will jump across it, they will drive over it.
They are correct, because they did not WALK across the stream.

 

[Saturnus]

I think it's safe to say with all our temperatures.. we're all like..

You must be registered to see attachments

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[BananaPrincess]

You must be registered to see attachments

@Teaspoon You got any ID? I wanna make sure that spoon is not underage....Also how much have you had to drink
tonight?