discussion Anti-Social & Lurker - Hideout spot

[Safetydummy]

Hello Lewd peoples!

Hello StephanieD! How are you?

 

[BananaPrincess]

I feel ya on the heat man. Just look at what's coming up for me.. ugh..

You must be registered to see attachments

Holy crap that's hot.

Here is mine

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[whoisit]

Maybe they intentionally made the rules vague so they could fuck with us in an arbitrary and capricious manner. I mean, I doubt it. But maybe.

Yeah, the rule is so obscure. If I have a self-taught model AI is perfectly fine? How can someone prove this, send it to the mods? And how can anyone know what set of pictures a websites model is trained on? This feels so much of a headache for mods and members.

 

[TheDude14]

yeah it can be tiring, i don't have a lot of time that i can spend here so i try to backread some pages to have some context on what they are talking about, rarely read whole threads and it usually ends up confusing me even more, like the whole talk on midgets. like one moment we talk about degenerate stuff then vanilla and hand holding and we somehow end up talking about midgets

Yeah sounds like a normal day here

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Evil Surgeon]

Holy crap that's hot.

Here is mine

You must be registered to see attachments

I think it's safe to say with all our temperatures.. we're all like..

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Flaming1]

Yeah, the rule is so obscure. If I have a self-taught model AI is perfectly fine? How can someone prove this, send it to the mods? And how can anyone know what set of pictures a websites model is trained on? This feels so much of a headache for mods and members.

Yeah it's so vague it's almost like they're trying to ban ai images without admitting they're trying to ban ai images, by making things so unclear that Noone knows what's safe to post.

I'm sure that's not the issue though, the vagueness and unclarity is merely a result of a rushed process and things will surely be clarified soonish.

 

[-Bonk-]

I think it's safe to say with all our temperatures.. we're all like..

You must be registered to see attachments

Ohhh, this might be real bad news for these brothers

You must be registered to see attachments

Talk about irony

#spoononice #metallicmeltdown

 

[Xonia]

You need to clarify the rules for AI.
Rule 7.A: Content that is generated with a program or a website that takes information from real photographs or drawn images.
Bans AI completely because all AIs are trained with real images from scratch. At least that's what I learned about AI.
Could be wrong.

Ai is supposed to be trained on data is collects from PAID data. However, AI is hard to damn near impossible to prove that its information is legally taken.
So, yes, it does ban AI completely for users to post. We are just allowing AI avatars because a majority had Avatars that become identities.
Nearly all rules and regulations are vague. hardly ever will certain rules and regulations be spelt out in specifics. Reason being, people will always use it a technicality.
I can say:
I dont want people to cross my stream so i say.
"DO not walk across that stream."
Ok, people wont walk across that steam. But they will run across it, they will jump across it, they will drive over it.
They are correct, because they did not WALK across the stream.

 

[Saturnus]

I think it's safe to say with all our temperatures.. we're all like..

You must be registered to see attachments

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[BananaPrincess]

You must be registered to see attachments

@Teaspoon You got any ID? I wanna make sure that spoon is not underage....Also how much have you had to drink
tonight?

 

[Evil Surgeon]

Ohhh, this might be real bad news for these brothers

You must be registered to see attachments

You must be registered to see attachments

Talk about irony

#spoononice #metallicmeltdown

Yeah, but think of all the cool things we could do if we melted some of that down. Could make something more useful.. no?

 

[El Buho]

Hey, El Buho, I'm a big fan of your avatar (though I will keep my own). I do have a joke for you, though...
"Knock, Knock"

"Who's there?"

"Yes..... Hooo."

That was told to me by an owl named Darius who lived at Shadowstone Park. Health and long-life to the hibou.

In honor of your user name ------>

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[-Bonk-]

Yeah, but think of all the cool things we could do if we melted some of that down. Could make something more useful.. no?

You must be registered to see attachments

You must be registered to see attachments

Doc , you're ready for war again ? so soon ?

 

[Evil Surgeon]

You must be registered to see attachments

Doc , you're ready for war again ? so soon ?

Really? You gotta ask me if I'm ready? You should know by now I'm a sandwich short of a picnic upstairs..

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[DoverDad]

Glad to have my pfp back but slightly edited it to remove the nips

 

[Dad70]

Ai is supposed to be trained on data is collects from PAID data. However, AI is hard to damn near impossible to prove that its information is legally taken.
So, yes, it does ban AI completely for users to post. We are just allowing AI avatars because a majority had Avatars that become identities.
Nearly all rules and regulations are vague. hardly ever will certain rules and regulations be spelt out in specifics. Reason being, people will always use it a technicality.
I can say:
I dont want people to cross my stream so i say.
"DO not walk across that stream."
Ok, people wont walk across that steam. But they will run across it, they will jump across it, they will drive over it.
They are correct, because they did not WALK across the stream.

Thanks for the reply and I understand it's a tough spot you're in right now, but the conclusion I can draw is that Ai is banned but still ok?
Then I ask myself the question: When is it okay and not?
We all need a straight answer so we don't unknowingly break the rules and create unnecessary problems for LC.

 

[TheDude14]

edited after mod clarification. Leaving the tiny caveat, because things are still on thin ice with me.
and this is from someone who been constantly telling people to be patient and give the mods a break. Imagine my reaction if I wasn't on the mods side. Enjoy all the oncoming flames. I won't attack beyond this. But I'm fucking done defending.

Hi Flaming hope this will cheer you up

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Safetydummy]

I see some PFPs back, is Ai allowed now?

Edit: Nevermind

Sorry, I saw Samantha Stevens/Elizabeth Montgomery and have no idea what you said...

from what I was told, all AI will be in P4. I don't think it can be in other place.

Hello Inyo How are you today... Still haven't had your thralls show up yet...

HEY "anybody" you kinda/sorta hijacked my avatar ( I know its not exactly the same, but very similar in concept) So maybe I should feel honored?

Quick Vote: Is that Cool?

I feel ya on the heat man. Just look at what's coming up for me.. ugh..

You must be registered to see attachments

Do you actually live IN actual Hell?

@Teaspoon You got any ID? I wanna make sure that spoon is not underage....Also how much have you had to drink
tonight?

I just wanted to say that I'm glad that a lot of YOU get to go back to using your old AI Avatars...

It's good to see the Banana Girl back!

 

[whoisit]

Thanks for the reply and I understand it's a tough spot you're in right now, but the conclusion I can draw is that Ai is banned but still ok?
Then I ask myself the question: When is it okay and not?
We all need a straight answer so we don't unknowingly break the rules and create unnecessary problems for LC.

This is as I interpret it. AI is banned, period. The reason it's vaguely described is so nobody can use a loophole.

 

[BananaPrincess]

Doctor Evil

You must be registered to see attachments