Theme editor

  • RequestStream Movies, TV shows and anime streaming • 1 week trial
  • LewdCorner Site Cleanup Update
    A new cleanup update has been posted covering the recent Vault rework, rank changes, policy cleanup, and theme polish. The goal is to make LC cleaner, easier to understand, and safer for the site going forward. - Jack Of Blades
    Read More

Movies that are ok to be remade or have a sequel LONG after og came out.

  • Thread starter Thread starter csmk515
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 63
  • Views Views 2K
Status
Not open for further replies.
Also - Carrie. Original was in 1970s starring Sissy Spacek (late 20s at the time), one in the 90s or early 2000s (forget who was in) then one in 2013 starring then 16 year old Chloe Moretz. Last one likely the best of them.
 
About 7 or 8 years ago, there was a little flurry of excitment/outrage over a possible gender-flipped remake of Lord of the Flies. I thought it sounded interesting.
Hard to see young girls getting violent/primitive like that.
 
Also - Carrie. Original was in 1970s starring Sissy Spacek (late 20s at the time), one in the 90s or early 2000s (forget who was in) then one in 2013 starring then 16 year old Chloe Moretz. Last one likely the best of them.
Original was Brian De Palma directed. A man known for excess. I've seen Scarface, and i have seen The Untouchables and Mission Impossible so yeah, i get his thing is over the top.
 
I'm against remakes in general and sequels, especially long after, too. That not only applies to movies but games too.
 
What about you made a film with no budget and then years later you can achieve the scenes you wanted so you tack them on. Its what George Lucas did with Return of the Jedi, the Special Editions and the prequels. I'd say there are at least three Star Wars pictures derivative of episode IV, Return of the Jedi, Phantom Menace but a lot less so than say the Force Awakens which is almost a beat for beat remake. Last Jedi sort of is a subverted Empire remake, Rise of Skywalker remakes ROTJ elements and even adapts parts of the Dark Empire comic. Its so watered down now.
 
Remakes typically haven't gone super well lol. There's exceptions though
 
What about you made a film with no budget and then years later you can achieve the scenes you wanted so you tack them on. Its what George Lucas did with Return of the Jedi, the Special Editions and the prequels. I'd say there are at least three Star Wars pictures derivative of episode IV, Return of the Jedi, Phantom Menace but a lot less so than say the Force Awakens which is almost a beat for beat remake. Last Jedi sort of is a subverted Empire remake, Rise of Skywalker remakes ROTJ elements and even adapts parts of the Dark Empire comic. Its so watered down now.
The prequels were pretty bad until the 3rd one, TBH.
 
Movies shouldn't get remade if you ask me. They usually turn out worse than the original.
 
I would love to see a sequel to DREED(2012) not to mistake with "Judge Dredd" (1995) which was so bad I don't remember anything about it, made in the same style as the original and without today's bullshit.
 
Studios can do whatever they want. But I like what one director (I forget who) said:

"Don't remake good movies. Remake bad ones."

Which, well, hopefully means you can only go up... hopefully.
 
I would love to see a sequel to DREED(2012) not to mistake with "Judge Dredd" (1995) which was so bad I don't remember anything about it, made in the same style as the original and without today's bullshit.
Dredd is great! I would hope they also film it in 3D!
 
Considering whal pile of quality producers in hollywood deliver this days i'd vote on a law forbidding any remakes.
 
the remake of robocop was ok but the originals are still so much beta
 
the remake of robocop was ok but the originals are still so much beta
I watch the ramake of robocop and liked it OK, but I think now I hate it. It's really the stupid hollywood mentality of making something "gritty" and "realistic" when the original worked perfectly fine.
 
The remake of A Star is Born a few years back was good. If they do it, it should be a modern setting rather than set still in the time the original was (if it was a "modern" setting for the time.) Problem is they usually fuck things up.
 
The key to the best remakes is to ignore what made the original good. If you try to follow the original, the result is 100% bland and uninspiring. If you do something different it's 90% horrible trash, 10% actually worthwhile movies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom