discussion What kind of game update do you prefer?

[libre]

Oh, yes. One release, hours of content, full story - keep dreaming. Patience is hard.

 

[Giggly]

Bigger updates = better updates. If that means they take more time, then so be it.

 

[darkie]

ofc i prefer fast with lots of content but realisticly slow with more content

 

[Djehuty]

Normal updates. The idea of slower but better updates is nice, but there's a point where I'll simply forget about the story or lose all the momentum it had built up. So much so that I rarely play those kind of games anymore, because I can't enjoy the story if I don't remember half of it and playing it all over again everytime isn't much better.

 

[Cougar18]

I can wait for content, but once it drops it should be fairly extensive.

 

[Soliare]

Ideally I want fast updates, but most of the time fast updates lead to low quality updates. Therefore I prefer slow updates that let the developer create high quality content, and unfortunately the developers that have great pride in their work have even slower updates that most games, 6-8 or more months in between updates.

 

[User_111887]

I'm fine with a normal update as long as it adds a good chunk of content to the game.

 

[sartalas]

I want to say normal but i actutally get more excited for faster updates even if they have less content

 

[MattShizzle]

Usually, the sooner the better so you remember better.

 

[ツSisterSexualシ]

"Fast update - More content"

 

[beanie69]

Slow - More

Fast more is always nice too

 

[LUVGAMZ23]

As much as I agree with the downside and all of the shit I've said about:

Guilty Pleasure [Quonix]
Grandma's House [Moonbox]

I cannot fault their release schedule.

I'm glad some of you like the opposite. I hope you enjoy it, truly. But the 1-2 (massive, granted) release a year titles are slowly dropping off my list.

FAST - LESS is my choice.

 

[feralchild]

I'd prefer slow updates, but normal is fine, too.
I just don't like super fast updates where there's very little content. Sometimes I'll start a game and barely anything happens at the end of the update.

 

[Loliholic]

Fast update every 1-2month
Slow update above 4month
Normal update around 3month

Strange numbers. I consider games dead if there is no update after 3 months.
And i dislike 10 minute playtime updates. A month is enough time to make progress, especially devs who beg for money should work for it.

 

[User_22565]

I would prefer normal, but as long as the overall update schedule is consistent than I can work with it.

 

[Mrjayded]

Should be a full update with new sizable content. I really hate the updates that say they just changed the text or font. That is not an update. Add content or wait until you can

 

[Lepomis]

Based on the choices you list - normal or slow updates - I'd rather the Dev take a little longer but provide more content in the update.

 

[Itsme]

Normal and slow updates with good content expansion is fine

 

[Finwin]

Slow update is fine if the Dev is still talking about the game and posting time frames giving something I can look forward too. Otherwise I just end up moving on and forgetting about it.

 

[mettersan]

I tend to gravitate towards the normal update, every 3 months, BUT, I do not mind a faster update cadence. All this is as long as the developer can maintain it without burning out.