3 Years of Service
depends on the game,
Walkthrough yay or nay?
- Thread starter thatoneuser
- Start date
- Replies 421
- Views 15K
5 Months of Service
The walkthrough is like a side option I use when I'm stuck in the middle but I Don't like modded walkthroughs
4 Months of Service
I hate missing content, so walkthroughs save me from seeing the same content over and over again trying every choice
3 Months of Service
I like walkthroughs for VN style games, when answering wrong just mean less game 
I do prefer games that don't lock you out of contents.
I do prefer games that don't lock you out of contents.
D
I always prefer walkthroughs to save time
3 Years of Service
Depends on the game. If the playthrough is ruined when choosing the wrong option then a walkthrough is a must.
If the walkthrough only saves you from discovering what to do on your own, that it is not needed at all.
If the walkthrough is Forced at the start of the game, forcing you to do certain actions in a certain way, that you find in a 100 other games. Then the game WILL get deleted and never looked at, let alone played EVER AGAIN.
If the walkthrough only saves you from discovering what to do on your own, that it is not needed at all.
If the walkthrough is Forced at the start of the game, forcing you to do certain actions in a certain way, that you find in a 100 other games. Then the game WILL get deleted and never looked at, let alone played EVER AGAIN.
3 Months of Service
Depends on the game and how linear it is, but 90% of the time, yay.
I believe majority of games do benefit from a walkthrough of some sort, or walkthrough like mechanics (for example, in novels, marking, or informing the player, if by selecting a choice, you'll miss something).
Though i think pure walkthroughs should be player made rather than developer created. As devs have a skewed, and biased perspective on what their game is, and where will be points of contention for the players.
I believe majority of games do benefit from a walkthrough of some sort, or walkthrough like mechanics (for example, in novels, marking, or informing the player, if by selecting a choice, you'll miss something).
Though i think pure walkthroughs should be player made rather than developer created. As devs have a skewed, and biased perspective on what their game is, and where will be points of contention for the players.
8 Months of Service
walkthrough mods make a lot of games more playable
3 Months of Service
On the first time playthrough no.
On 2nd or 3rd playthrough yes to see if I missed any content.
On 2nd or 3rd playthrough yes to see if I missed any content.
3 Months of Service
It depends heavily on the game, i find fun to figure out stuff in say, Succubus Prison, but some games have some bullshit in them. For instance Lobotomy Corporation has a mechanic where you always fail to interact with an abnormality if it is within your camera's sight, with no indication of such, i looked it up because that was pretty bad design and i do not regret it. Besides that, if you don't want to sink 900 hours to get each ending and all achievements in some games, you're gonna need an walkthrough.
3 Months of Service
Yeah, I prefer it honestly. just to save time and look at all the game has to offer
E
If there is walkthrough it means game is not well done enough to people figure it out by themselves
3 Months of Service
A walkthrough is always helpful when you're stuck.
3 Months of Service
yes for WT, or a mod that highlights choices impact
1 Month of Service
Depends on how lost i am in the game
1 Month of Service
I hate missing out on content, if I need a walkthrough to not miss something I like having one. If it's a sandbox game I don't mind fucking around for a bit trying stuff out before trying a walkthrough though, and if it's impossible to miss out on anything I'll generally power through
Similar threads
Legal Notice
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files