2 Years of Service
That's the thing is always catch me, i indeed want more content quickly, but when is short it's a big turn off to me, so i prefer big ups slowly
-
LewdCorner Site Cleanup UpdateA new cleanup update has been posted covering the recent Vault rework, rank changes, policy cleanup, and theme polish. The goal is to make LC cleaner, easier to understand, and safer for the site going forward. - Jack Of BladesRead More
Updates and their content - Fewer content but frequent updates or larger content but slower updates?
- Thread starter Rogaldorn777
- Start date
- Replies 75
- Views 3K
3 Years of Service
But it should be able to import from part 1 to 2 and etc, without having to ask questions the player might not remember - or worse, ignoring previous player decisions. If player decisions don't matter at all, it isn't a game. It's also bullshit when there are paths and they work 1 path at a time so by the time they get to your path it can be over a year.
U
i prefer slower release but large and worthy content my part.
U
Give me those yearly updates that have enough content to last me at least 1-2 hours
3 Years of Service
Way too long. How can you remember from 1 year ago?
2 Years of Service
small but frequent updates are most of the time not worth the effort to even download for the amount they add, plus its usually mostly bugfixes rather than new content
3 Years of Service
If it's just bugfixes, only worth it if you heard of the bugs and didn't download the previous version because of such.
1 Year of Service
Doesn't matter. I can view changelog and decide should I download this part or not. If it's more convenient for the dev to update game rarely, so be it.
3 Years of Service
Fewer content but frequent updates probably... but updates that are around 2-4 months with some decent content.
U
Doesn't matter. If the developer releases small updates monthly - what's stopping you from waiting 3-4 months and seeing exactly what's new in the game.
2 Years of Service
For devs, I think frequent updates are better because it'll usually help them grow their project, simply because every update raises the chance to attract new players, etc.
I personally prefer slightly larger updates with a little more content as it feels nicer to get into the game again and to play for some time before it's over.
I personally prefer slightly larger updates with a little more content as it feels nicer to get into the game again and to play for some time before it's over.
2 Years of Service
Definitely larger. If small updates come after I reach the end of a game I will let it cook before diving back in
2 Years of Service
large content but slower update. You don't want a situation where you do frequent updates but it so minors of an update or if it in a branch that less likely to seen then people would be less likely to play the games sense they don't consider it having any meaningful update. This can hurt a game in the long run.
U
like the most people here: slower but more content.
3 Years of Service
Bigger updates in a slower pace with steady dev news
2 Years of Service
By making a quick recap. Most of the time if it is yearly released I just replay from start
2 Years of Service
large updates, if its small updates id wait till there were enough of them to warrant playing again which is pretty much the same as waiting for a large update
3 Years of Service
Fuck that, I delete when it forces you to start over. Not doing that.
2 Years of Service
It must be a balance between waiting time and content. If it delays too much, I lose the interest to keep playing that game, doesn't matter if the updates are large. If a dev releases frequent updates with small content, it's not too much of a problem, I will adjust my time waiting several updates before play it again, the worst thing is when the releases are small but the waiting time is too long. It feels following just a milking dev.
Legal Notice
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files