discussion Lolis and Bestiality

[Coran]

Never something I even considered looking for. But it did come up in a game I played once and I didn't not like it.

 

[haloodst39]

I just can't find it in games. It can certainly fit for certain themes or media, but it just depends most the time.

 

[Redyscom]

For no particular reason, threads about lolis have become more active in recent days.

 

[riccs98]

I have no interest in sexual content involving animals. It does nothing for me. It is simply not my thing.

 

[fuzzi_weezil]

It's a kink that I have no interest in. That said, I'm certainly not here to kink shame so whatever floats your boat, then more power to you.

 

[vika20012]

Not my thing but I don't look away ... ;-)

 

[Narch]

Neutral to it, most bestially stuff invoke this feeling of extreme unsanitary that irks me the wrong way. But depending on the animal and scene it's a decent way to involve large insertions. I think the worst offender are stuff involving pigs, the whole core of it revolves around being disgusting and degrading.

 

[Humanoidsopont]

So, this is something I have OPINIONS on.

Item 1: IRL, for either, is hard no, obviously.
Item 2: Real girls, 18+, playing with beasty toys of real or fantasy flavor, is moderately appealing.
Item 3: Fictional girls, in a text or visual medium, getting it on with a nonsapient mammal or fantasy reptile, can be hot, so long as there is some flavor of consent going on FROM THE ANIMAL. If the girl is making a move on the dog/horse/whatever, and it's not into it, that's a pass. I'm actually less concerned about the girl's consent (although my overall preferences there are CNC or reluctant acceptance, hypno, corruption, pheromones, mindcontrol, whatever, rather than actual hard r@pe.) A decent example of an edge case would be a naive schoolgirl exploring with her dog. If that gets the dog into her, I'm into it. If she has to use the peanut butter trick or other things to coerce the dog? eh, no. If the dog is pushy with her, or there's some kind of MUSK situation, I'm down for that, depending on the quality of the work.
Item 4: Fictional girls getting it on with sapient mammals/reptiles who are into or instigating the encounter? Firm yes.
Item 5: bugs, worms, infestations, and honestly, 68% of most tentacle monsters (with the exceptions being, once again, the sapient consenting type, rather than the mindless variety) = Hard no, ew.

Thank you for listening to my ted talk.

 

[a1fox3]

Never play it or like it,

 

[Xeno_Frost]

Either way i found it an enjoyable watch but i much prefer consensual encounters

 

[a1fox3]

Nope not at all.
Bestiality is in the same boat as NTR, scat, rape and drugs use to get sex with.
I hate all of them.

 

[IxChewx]

Not bestiality or animal like characters for that matter.

 

[twaine]

Damn...I guess I'm fucked up lol. I'm down! Honestly wish more games included either/or, at least give the option for those who want to skip like most games do now.

 

[pearson.smith]

It's not really my thing, but if the work is well made, it can still work for me. Anyone else the same?

 

[Deleted member 22643]

its like peanut butter and chocolate, great by themselves but godly when combined

 

[koko253]

Yes, I enjoy it very much, whether I like Loli or not, I like this genre.

 

[Konstantinople]

No animals, no harm/hurt or threats to the lolis. They are little angels and should be treated as such.

 

[Republican Bear]

Like I probably said before on this on another thread nope.

Don't see the appeal and my kinks are not normal either.

 

[kermitsu]

Yes, as long as it's not insects. Hard to find games with both.

 

[exlurker]

For no particular reason, threads about lolis have become more active in recent days.

Don't know if sarcastic or not, but the reason is atf refugees.