1 Year of Service
This game was abandoned or not?
- Thread starter SeveredRealms
- Start date
- Replies 2K
- Views 605K
3 Years of Service
The short story version I think applies to all of us on this thread, it is a major plot point in the story in a lot of AVNs and we are all here talking about it.
I would not have guessed that second part at all.
4 Years of Service
Probably, looks like he started a new game
3 Years of Service
Really? Where did you see that? I am surprised since all of the work he did aging up the girls, that is a lot of work to just throw away. Also what is the new game?
4 Years of Service
Lol nothing, but I was referring to real life with those incest stories you hear about in the news with daddy turning their daughters into cock sleeves and kept tied up, home-schooled and pregnant in their basements or purpose-built dungeon rooms, whether they want that or not.
4 Years of Service
That would be cool if I was not the only one in this thread that had a few kids with his real sister (not an AVN version). I mean one of my classmates knocked up his mom when he was 15 (lucky bastard, total milf goddess, that one was so couldn't blame him for being a momma's boy), but after graduation I went to college he joined the military and we kinda lost touch after that.The short story version I think applies to all of us on this thread, it is a major plot point in the story in a lot of AVNs and we are all here talking about it.
4 Years of Service
4 Years of Service
Fair enough, thought you meant in games
https://lewdcorner.com/threads/corrupted-sponsor-v1-0-ric0h.14252/
I don't think lying is beneath him but we'll see
1 Year of Service
hoping for a new update soon
1 Year of Service
There is so much fun activities and choices in this game. Really well done. Can be kind, corrupting, or even a bit violent at times. Story and characters balance it well and the choices matter. Look forward to more updates!
3 Years of Service
I love this game.
I really am not trying to start a war here, so please don't take this the wrong way, but there are a number of reviews rating the game one star, apparently because the author decided to make changes to the girls' appearance. Now, I love a good loli as much as the next guy (in a theoretical, non-IRL kind of way), but I think there's a degree of irony in people insisting that the "authorities" should not be able to dictate the appearance of a game, but then rate a game one-star in an effort to dictate the appearance of a game....
Do I wish that Ricoh had left the girl from the orphanage the way she was originally? Well, kind of. She was a variation that we don't otherwise get, though I actually think she's improved in the new version. But do I think he should have been allowed to leave her the way she was? Absolutely.
But I also believe that he should be allowed to change her as he sees fit (or necessary). If we truly believe that there shouldn't be censorship, then we should take the games as the author makes them. We shouldn't try to censor (or what we might regard as "un-censor") the game any more than we think the authorities should.
So I don't think we should down-rate a game because we object to the author's decision to revise a game to stay out of whatever trouble he might anticipate. Let's be grateful for Ricoh's work here and rate the game as it deserves to be rated on its own merits.
Just my two cents, worth probably considerably less.
I really am not trying to start a war here, so please don't take this the wrong way, but there are a number of reviews rating the game one star, apparently because the author decided to make changes to the girls' appearance. Now, I love a good loli as much as the next guy (in a theoretical, non-IRL kind of way), but I think there's a degree of irony in people insisting that the "authorities" should not be able to dictate the appearance of a game, but then rate a game one-star in an effort to dictate the appearance of a game....
Do I wish that Ricoh had left the girl from the orphanage the way she was originally? Well, kind of. She was a variation that we don't otherwise get, though I actually think she's improved in the new version. But do I think he should have been allowed to leave her the way she was? Absolutely.
But I also believe that he should be allowed to change her as he sees fit (or necessary). If we truly believe that there shouldn't be censorship, then we should take the games as the author makes them. We shouldn't try to censor (or what we might regard as "un-censor") the game any more than we think the authorities should.
So I don't think we should down-rate a game because we object to the author's decision to revise a game to stay out of whatever trouble he might anticipate. Let's be grateful for Ricoh's work here and rate the game as it deserves to be rated on its own merits.
Just my two cents, worth probably considerably less.
4 Years of Service
The 1*'s are usually from the original fans that sub just for the lolis and then get the rug pulled from under them when they get removed in one way or another (written out of the story, aged up, etc) so of course they are going to feel ripped off and pissed off about it. I don't blame them, it's one of the main reasons I mostly don't give money to unfinished shit anymore (other than the few with a spine that have a multiple-year record of artistic integrity like Ketzal and Blackheart). But since they don't get to ask the payment platform for a refund like they should be able to leaving 1* reviews on every AVN site it's on is their only recourse.
3 Years of Service
Thank you. I played the game and it looks completed, the thread even says Complete, so hopefully he is just taking a break and will continue with this one after he is done.
3 Years of Service
Quite a few things to unpack here. In no particular order.
1-I down-rate IRL stuff all the time. I hate the rain. If it became illegal to say "I hate the rain" (even though me saying it will NEVER stop the rain), I guess I'm getting fined, jailed, whatever... but I'll still say I HATE THE RAIN.
2-There's a disconnect between 2 groups of people that consume anything (in this case AVNs, in others, TV and movies). Some consider it art. Others (like ME) consider it a product. And if it's a product, like, say, coffee, you can bet your ass I want the coffee (or TV show or AVN in this case) EXACTLY my way. If it used to be and it's not anymore, the product is ruined (FOR ME). Which brings us to...
3-Engagement. If people didn't give a shit about the product, they'd just dump it after the change, get something else and that would be that. BUT... if you really liked the product OR it's a rare product (such as the tag mentioned) the emotional reaction will be higher. And, just like with the rain, they'll vent because they have... you know... emotions. I'm ancient enough to remember when emotions used to matter.
4-Finally: negativity. OMG it could be in my head but, these days, do people ever LOSE THEIR SHIT when someone is negative, complains, etc... I'm the reverse. I can't stand "positive only please" people. People vent about this game (or others), and then... they feel better and they move on. Positive feelings only or positive ratings only posts... well... respect for the mods make me drop this here.
Anyhow, going to have a coffee EXACTLY my way while I flail my cane uselessly at the rain and mourn the lack of tag / pictures of this AVN. Old man energy... expended... heh.
3 Years of Service
Quite a few things to respond to here. In numerical order:
1. I agree, I agree, I agree. I also down rate stuff all the time. Rain? For me, that's a four out of five stars. I bet if I lived in Seattle or London, it would be 2 out of 5 (though I did live in London for an extended period, and I still like the rain...).
1a. To be clear, I was never proposing that we throw you in jail because you're complaining about the rain, the coffee, or Corrupted Love. I was only waxing hopefully for a kinder approach.
2. Again, I agree, I agree, I agree. I also consider it a product and it has to appeal to the market. But it also has to appeal to the market within the confines of the author's comfort. Personally, I find some of the BDSM stuff on site way over the top for me. Even though I would never do 95% of the stuff we see on site, I still appreciate (and consume) a good portion of what's on site. I would never touch some of the hard core BDSM stuff, though, even if it otherwise hits my kinks. If I were the author of AVNs, I would never write that stuff into one of my games, whatever the demand in the market.
2a. To your point, I love my coffee exactly my way. But I was asking us as a community to consider drinking a little coffee that's less than perfect in some people's eyes. It's a four out of five, or even three out of five, cup. (If I don't have time to make coffee at home, I'll drink the s**t they have at the office. Even though I'm going to complain, I know in my heart that's at least 3-star coffee. (It's a fancy machine, and I'm sure others would say it's 5-star.) I should, in fairness, rate it 3* or 4*, even though I'm pissed off that I didn't have time to make my own cup.
3. I agree, I agree, I agree. I think the (over) reactions displayed on this thread are a function of people's engagement with Corrupted Love and their love for it. So it's not a bad thing at all that people are reacting, and even overreacting. I just hope that seeing something other than a 5 star average doesn't drive new consumers away from a near perfect product, that new consumers might actually pull out their wallet and support.
4. I agree, I agree, I agree. Period. I agree.
4a. I don't think my ask was for rainbow shitting unicorns. I'm all for appropriate negativity, and appropriate positivity.
5. My concern, however, was not down-rating rain, coffee, or AVNs in a measured way. My concern was with overreaction, and massive overreaction. I don't believe that Down-rating Corrupted Love from a five-star game to a one-star game is a realistic reflection of most people's actual reaction to the game. If you miss the true lolis, by all means knock a star off, but rate the game, as it stands, on its own merits, not in comparison to what it once was.
5a. I recognize, of course, that this is a totally inhuman ask. We naturally (emotionally) compare things to what they once were rather than giving them a brand new fresh shake. This is true of our friends, our lovers, our coffee, and our movies. Blade Runner 2049 might have been a perfectly excellent movie on its own merits, but it was inevitably compared unfavorably to the original. Back to the Future 3, however, is a different story.
6. We can but try....
3 Years of Service
@Everyone
**v0.10 Release Dates**
```js
"Mega Supporter" = Apr 14th 2025
"Elite Supporter" = Apr 16th 2025
"Super Supporter" = Apr 21st 2025
"Advanced Supporter" = Apr 26th 2025
"Supporter" = May 1st 2025
"Release" = May 6th 2025
```
*Day10 focuses on Jasmin and Lauren, this update may seem small if you're not on their paths.*
2 Years of Service
hope we get more really love whats here and dont want it to end
Similar threads
