discussion Chicks With Dicks or Trap Yes or No

[Roki1212]

If a guy is even remotely interested in someone with a dick = gay.

So there is no difference.

 

[MattShizzle]

So there is no difference.

Not really, and futa is just some weird thing that isn't real, where they have both. Frankly it's gross.

 

[Roki1212]

Not really, and futa is just some weird thing that isn't real, where they have both. Frankly it's gross.

That's what I know, coz originally that was Futa and now it's just Woman with a dick. Which is already fucked up anyway. But I don't get the difference between Trap and Femboy, what the fuck is the difference?

 

[kikomascado]

Not really, and futa is just some weird thing that isn't real, where they have both. Frankly it's gross.

True hermaphrodites are very rare, but not impossible.

 

[Sol_Invictus]

if they look enough like a girl its fine

 

[User_58620]

I ain't gay. But if there is a dude who looks like a chick with a dick, I am down. If there is a woman who looks like a man, thats gay even if she has a pussy. Pretty traps > ugly chicks

 

[Hexborn_Magus]

i think some of you are missing the forest through the trees. are liking traps and futas gay, yes 100% because you like dick. that being said, if a woman is a full 100% natural born genetic woman her entire life and then suddenly a wizard or some shit pops outta a bush and curses her to have a dick, that does not mean she is automatically a "dude with tits" i would say that just factually and logically speaking that would literally be a chick with a magically added dick.
we are talkin about porn game here, meaning fictional realities. so if the world just has futas running around its completely unhinged to go "dude with tits" every time without thinking about the circumstances.

I mean, futa are supposed to also have a vagina, so don't think that means a person is 100% gay for being into a futa (especially if they're a woman). When it comes to these sexual attractions, I've learned there are a couple of terms that are a bit more fitting than the usual "gay, straight, bi" spectrum, and those are Gynesexual and Androsexual. Gynesexuals are attracted to all things feminine, regardless of the gender/sex of the individual, and Androsexuals are attracted to all things masculine. Personally, I'm a Gynesexual. It doesn't matter what's between those legs, if they're feminine, I want them riding my face or enjoying one of my toys up their ass, or both at the same time. If they're masculine, eh, I'm pretty indifferent, would take getting to know them to see if a spark can kick things off.

So what's the difference between Femboy and Trap? At the end is it simply two names for the same thing?

Technically the same thing, but Trap is considered an already antiquated term among femboy communities due to the implication that the individual is deliberately attempting to deceive someone into having sex with them, which makes the term sound inherently rapey.

 

[Corellius]

Well, I would argue that saying that all people who like traps and futas are gay, is not the most meaningful way to use that word. I mean, I personally don't particularly like dicks, but if a cute girl comes with one attached, I don't really mind. Now, you can call me whatever label you want, but I would say that straight is a more accurate description for me than gay. When I go out I look at women, not men; when I watch a movie I might feel attracted to some of the female actresses, not the male actors. If someone wants to know what I'm attracted to, and you tell them I'm gay, I feel you would be misinforming them. That doesn't mean that there can't also be gay people (or any other sexual orientation) that like traps and futa, but to say that everyone who does is gay, I think is wrong.

And to elaborate on the way I feel about dicks, I believe that people are (generally) not attracted to body parts in isolation. A dick in isolation would be a dildo. People are not attracted to that. I mean, people use dildos for pleasure, but they need to think about something else when using them. As a more clear example, guys are not attracted to their hands. So, the context around the body part matters, and is what we can really be attracted to or not. I mean, I love pussies, pussies are great, but when I think about it, I would be pretty disgusted by a pussy under a man's armpit, for example. So I guess in the end I actually only like pussies when they're on a woman, at the regular position. So yeah, context definitely matters. A dick on a guy is not the same as a dick on a girl.

nah bro, if you do things and there is a dick involved its at least a little gay. no getting around that. but dont misunderstand me, im not the other extreme here either. i would fuck a futa in a heartbeat, and have actually fucked traps... but im a bisexual degenerate slut, so ill admit not being a great source.

So what's the difference between Femboy and Trap? At the end is it simply two names for the same thing?

basically there is no real difference. but if you want to get technical, a femboy has more emphasis on the BOY. its a boy who is feminine "enough" to make the closeted "straight" people constantly assert that traps are "totally not gay!" when a femboy is like the second gayest thing you could bang (first being idk, a big hairy lumberjack) a trap is basically a femboy in a dress that is so feminine that nobody can tell its actually a guy until the "trap card" is activated and their pants drop lol

I ain't gay. But if there is a dude who looks like a chick with a dick, I am down. If there is a woman who looks like a man, thats gay even if she has a pussy. Pretty traps > ugly chicks

thats a good point. im pretty darn gay, but still like girls... but i would never bang some jacked burly dude with a pussy. probably the only valid counter argument to my general thesis ive ever actually seen lol. i stand by the notion that if there is a dick involved its at least a bit gay. even if it was your girl friend for years and a wizard put a dick on her, if you ever touch that thing, you gay now lul. but some burly trans masc dude.... hmm still seems super gay, but no dick....... no clue how to solve this logic loophole. maybe broaden it to anything other than 1 normal woman is gay. meaning to be 100% straight you can only ever enjoy boring vanilla sex and nothing else. well i guess maledom is still okay too, but if you the masochist then its still a little bit gay. something like that works i think. monster girls could be straight too, but thats also bestiality.... not sure if that counts as gay.... im leaning towards no, but idk. . . needs its own thread maybe lol.

 

[blackdoo]

Traps are love, traps are life. For some reason though futas turn me off.

 

[uncbuck]

a little contrast never hurts -- but they need to have average apparatus at the biggest -- huge FUTAs are just scary

 

[Corellius]

Traps are love, traps are life. For some reason though futas turn me off.

do you still like girls? if not obviously just 100% gay lol. but if you do.... huh, weird.... then again i figure alot on this site are probably in the "flat is justice" camp opposed to "beeg ol tiddies" so maybe you just dont care about boobs lol.

 

[MattShizzle]

do you still like girls? if not obviously just 100% gay lol. but if you do.... huh, weird.... then again i figure alot on this site are probably in the "flat is justice" camp opposed to "beeg ol tiddies" so maybe you just dont care about boobs lol.

I don't care about tits, but a dick is a 100% no fucking way.

 

[blackdoo]

do you still like girls? if not obviously just 100% gay lol. but if you do.... huh, weird.... then again i figure alot on this site are probably in the "flat is justice" camp opposed to "beeg ol tiddies" so maybe you just dont care about boobs lol.

Yeah i actually only like girls and traps, but the traps have to be flat, I think there's a extra taboo factor, futa's just seem kinda boring to me.

 

[Corellius]

Yeah i actually only like girls and traps, but the traps have to be flat, I think there's a extra taboo factor, futa's just seem kinda boring to me.

huh... weird. futas not really existing makes them more exotic to me. literally a different strokes for different folks moment lol

 

[blackdoo]

huh... weird. futas not really existing makes them more exotic to me. literally a different strokes for different folks moment lol

Long strokes at that as well.

 

[kikomascado]

I mean, futa are supposed to also have a vagina, so don't think that means a person is 100% gay for being into a futa (especially if they're a woman). When it comes to these sexual attractions, I've learned there are a couple of terms that are a bit more fitting than the usual "gay, straight, bi" spectrum, and those are Gynesexual and Androsexual. Gynesexuals are attracted to all things feminine, regardless of the gender/sex of the individual, and Androsexuals are attracted to all things masculine. Personally, I'm a Gynesexual. It doesn't matter what's between those legs, if they're feminine, I want them riding my face or enjoying one of my toys up their ass, or both at the same time. If they're masculine, eh, I'm pretty indifferent, would take getting to know them to see if a spark can kick things off.

Technically the same thing, but Trap is considered an already antiquated term among femboy communities due to the implication that the individual is deliberately attempting to deceive someone into having sex with them, which makes the term sound inherently rapey.

I agree with you, but when I said sexuality is a spectrum here some time ago, some dude cursed at me saying I was "woke".
I don't consider myself 100% straight, as I would even play with a dick it was attached to a cute feminine person, but saying I'm bi I think it's misleading, since I don't feel any attraction to masculine people, even if the masculine person in indeed an female (like if she is muscular, hairy etc.).
So until there is another popular term for it, I'll still consider myself straight, not because I'm ashamed or anything, but because it's just easier.

 

[Hexborn_Magus]

I agree with you, but when I said sexuality is a spectrum here some time ago, some dude cursed at me saying I was "woke".
I don't consider myself 100% straight, as I would even play with a dick it was attached to a cute feminine person, but saying I'm bi I think it's misleading, since I don't feel any attraction to masculine people, even if the masculine person in indeed an female (like if she is muscular, hairy etc.).
So until there is another popular term for it, I'll still consider myself straight, not because I'm ashamed or anything, but because it's just easier.

Eh, anyone who screams "woke" is just a jerk that can't handle the reality that we tend to have new terms for things as we learn more about how things work. This same person probably would be throwing a fit over women wearing pants if they were born a couple hundred years ago, and probably even would have a conniption at the idea of transitioning from roman to arabic numerals if they were around in that time period.

 

[blackdoo]

Eh, anyone who screams "woke" is just a jerk that can't handle the reality that we tend to have new terms for things as we learn more about how things work. This same person probably would be throwing a fit over women wearing pants if they were born a couple hundred years ago, and probably even would have a conniption at the idea of transitioning from roman to arabic numerals if they were around in that time period.

I don't see the point in all the arguing about all the "inbetween" sexualities, just like whatever the fuck you like, noone except the loud hateful minority cares.

 

[Corellius]

lets avoid getting political... or at least try too maybe. this is a bootleg porn site, not a soap box. "frankly both extremes annoy me" -jolee bindo

ill say only this one side cares to much whos fucking who, and the other cares WAY too much about telling people who they wanna fuck before anything else like its the only thing that matters. personally, who cares? fuck whoever ya want, its not my business. 25 years ago one side were unhinged zealots, 25 years later now its the other that are unhinged zealots. the pendulum keeps swinging and the sane people are left to pick up the pieces.

so lets leave it there eh? or somebody will have to call the mods to kill the thread

 

[blackfyre]

I agree with you, but when I said sexuality is a spectrum here some time ago, some dude cursed at me saying I was "woke".
I don't consider myself 100% straight, as I would even play with a dick it was attached to a cute feminine person, but saying I'm bi I think it's misleading, since I don't feel any attraction to masculine people, even if the masculine person in indeed an female (like if she is muscular, hairy etc.).
So until there is another popular term for it, I'll still consider myself straight, not because I'm ashamed or anything, but because it's just easier.

That's exactly where I stand. I believe everyone is at least a little bit bi, and they sit somewhere in a spectrum between the 100% straight that loves all things female and is disgusted by all things male, and the 100% gay which is the opposite. I'm not 100% straight, but I think I'm close enough to it that it makes more sense to call me straight than bi. But in the end I don't really care much about any of those labels; I just like whatever I like, and that's it.