1/3
1 Year of Service
My degrees are in biology and psychology with a focus on neuropsychology. I highly doubt that extremely rare conditions like chimerism are more prevalent than [body] dysmorphia. And I would not take stock in research that depends on fMRI either. There's a reason it isn't commonly used for medical purposes. The fact that the color coding is arbitrary, that the diagnostic software is based on assumptions, that the resolution is not very accurate, that level of detection can vary, that the meaurment does not take into account latency, that there is no way to account for false positives, and so many other variables... Most research in this area is regularly contradictory. One study says one thing while another says something completely different. People tend to take one study and ignore those which do not support their personal views. My research team in college was given time on an fMRI. It was interesting, but hardly definitive. "Brain scan" technolgy is in it's infancy and just about everything we think we know about the brain right now could largely be wrong.Based on the existence of things like Chimera syndrome and studies that have been done, it is far more likely biological than psychological, because we know twin fetuses can be absorbed by one another in the womb, even if they are opposite sexed, and we know trans people's brain structure falls in between that of the male and female brain thanks to said studies. What happens when the brain of one sex is in the body of the opposite? Probably, gender identity issues like that we see in trans people.
Whether you ascribe to the Kinsey scale or to plasticity, one thing tends to be true. Men are less variable than women. Your attraction to female qualities is biological . If it looks like a duck... and so on. Biology can be maniuplated and it can be fooled. Thus, the 'trap' moniker. A third person doesn't 'know' if someong is male or female until they can identify which gametes they produce. So you're being fooled, no matter the intension.As for sexuality, it's not really "gay or straight." After all, there's a whole spectrum of sexualities out there. I, for instance, am attracted to feminine qualities, regardless of sex. Femboys (or traps), attractive. Trans women, attractive. Cis women, attractive. Twinks? Not as much. Trans men? If they're femboys (yes, there are feminine trans men), then yes, otherwise, not really. Likewise, very masculine women and cis men aren't attractive to me. Thick facial and body hair? Too masculine, complete turn off. Bodybuilder women? Starts hitting that too masculine mark for me, so turn off, even though muscular women are a yes otherwise.
Which can lead to self doubt, confution, cognitive dissonance and even [body] dysmorphia. It's a silly notion to simply say "you're born that way" as it removes a persons agency, environmental variables and the aging process on our cells. Women's sexuality can undergo extreme changes as they mature, but men tend not to.
I acutually tried in collge. My accademic advisor said I should avoid it for the same reason. Didn't want the university to incure the wrath of political groups. I recieved top marks for my work in another area, but I somtimes regret it. He probably saved my degree and future career lol.I could practically write a thesis on this subject, but doing so would definitely be crossing the "no politics" rule, and be 100% off thread topic (I acknowledge I'm straddling the line on that one already with this).
Anyway, sorry for the long post. It's a really interesting subject and one I still read up on when possible. There is very little actual good research being done these days as someone always seems to have an agenda. The EU is doing much better work.