1/3
1 Year of Service
I've always been drawn to the monstergirls, there's something about their complexity and depth that resonates with me, a mix of the unknown and the alluring that I find really compelling.
Hmm are vampires monster girls? They meet the technical definition but.....somehow I feel that nekos are actually closer to monster girls then vampires.Well, if vampires are considered monster girls I don't see how much the appearance really is the point to take into account.
But it really does depend in how it is handled. I would say that if the story is able to convey some sort of byological diference apart of the tail and ears it pass. (Not sure if monster would be acurate but that certainly makes them not human)
I wouldn't count them as monster girls, but I think it depends on each person's definition. For me monster girls would be like the SCP shit, Mal0 and the likes. A lot of people seem to classify anything that is humanoid but not exactly human but I've always disliked that classification, because it's way too vague.alot of people talk about how they like monstergirls but most talk about regular girls with ears and a tail stapled on instead of a girl with a non humanoid body ,do catgirls really count as a monstergirls?
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files