Theme editor

  • RequestStream Movies, TV shows and anime streaming • 1 week trial
  • LewdCorner Site Cleanup Update
    A new cleanup update has been posted covering the recent Vault rework, rank changes, policy cleanup, and theme polish. The goal is to make LC cleaner, easier to understand, and safer for the site going forward. - Jack Of Blades
    Read More

anyone play incest games because of your past experiences

  • Thread starter Thread starter jedichip
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 83
  • Views Views 4K
main-qimg-22730118696a3e298a94fe3da92d9526
 
It is basically impossible to get accurate statistics, since any consensual relationship is unlikely to ever become a matter of public record. Studies would indicate sibling incest is the most common form of consensual incest, and consensual acts are far more common than people think, but there is no way to know how common. When it comes to the usual statistics that is used, that being sexual abuse by a family member, then it is father-daughter that is the most common by far, followed by brother-sister.

The problem with separating consensual and non-consensual incest is that there's no clear line. An elder brother can groom his sister just as easily as a father with his daughter, and it doesn't make sense to talk about consent in that context
 
  • Like
Reactions: :-(
The problem with separating consensual and non-consensual incest is that there's no clear line. An elder brother can groom his sister just as easily as a father with his daughter, and it doesn't make sense to talk about consent in that context
I respectfully disagree. There cases where no grooming could happen, for instance when the people in question only meet later in their life. Adults can also make their own decisions, no matter who they are to each other. And if you assume grooming is what happened when incest is involved, then you should assume that is what happens in any sexual encounter between people who have been in frequent contact. A childhood friend hooking up with their friend? Grooming. Two people from the same school getting together? Grooming. An intern getting together with an older coworker? Grooming. An employee hooking up with their boss? Grooming. Now, it is possible for grooming to be the issue in any of these, but you would not assume so out of hand.

I in no way condone any sexual contact between adults and minors, that situation has such a clear-cut imbalance that it would be impossible to argue otherwise. That is sexual abuse, whether it is incestuous or not.

But when it comes to cases where the people are adults, or similar-aged siblings, there is room for nuance. It does not make sense to assume a lack of consent in incestuous unions, just because they are incestuous.

I have seen arguments that even in cases of twin siblings, the assumed power imbalance still makes it wrong. Yet, which participant is the one in power? And if a power imbalance is an issue in relationships, no matter how small, show me one relationship where there is a perfect balance and I will name you a liar. An extrovert will likely have a stronger position over an introvert, for example. Or the one earning more money. Or the one who is physically stronger. Or the one that is more clever.
 
Thread owner
I respectfully disagree. There cases where no grooming could happen, for instance when the people in question only meet later in their life. Adults can also make their own decisions, no matter who they are to each other. And if you assume grooming is what happened when incest is involved, then you should assume that is what happens in any sexual encounter between people who have been in frequent contact. A childhood friend hooking up with their friend? Grooming. Two people from the same school getting together? Grooming. An intern getting together with an older coworker? Grooming. An employee hooking up with their boss? Grooming. Now, it is possible for grooming to be the issue in any of these, but you would not assume so out of hand.

I in no way condone any sexual contact between adults and minors, that situation has such a clear-cut imbalance that it would be impossible to argue otherwise. That is sexual abuse, whether it is incestuous or not.

But when it comes to cases where the people are adults, or similar-aged siblings, there is room for nuance. It does not make sense to assume a lack of consent in incestuous unions, just because they are incestuous.

I have seen arguments that even in cases of twin siblings, the assumed power imbalance still makes it wrong. Yet, which participant is the one in power? And if a power imbalance is an issue in relationships, no matter how small, show me one relationship where there is a perfect balance and I will name you a liar. An extrovert will likely have a stronger position over an introvert, for example. Or the one earning more money. Or the one who is physically stronger. Or the one that is more clever.
that was very deep thank you and I appreciate the thought
 
I respectfully disagree. There cases where no grooming could happen, for instance when the people in question only meet later in their life. Adults can also make their own decisions, no matter who they are to each other. And if you assume grooming is what happened when incest is involved, then you should assume that is what happens in any sexual encounter between people who have been in frequent contact. A childhood friend hooking up with their friend? Grooming. Two people from the same school getting together? Grooming. An intern getting together with an older coworker? Grooming. An employee hooking up with their boss? Grooming. Now, it is possible for grooming to be the issue in any of these, but you would not assume so out of hand.

I in no way condone any sexual contact between adults and minors, that situation has such a clear-cut imbalance that it would be impossible to argue otherwise. That is sexual abuse, whether it is incestuous or not.

But when it comes to cases where the people are adults, or similar-aged siblings, there is room for nuance. It does not make sense to assume a lack of consent in incestuous unions, just because they are incestuous.

I have seen arguments that even in cases of twin siblings, the assumed power imbalance still makes it wrong. Yet, which participant is the one in power? And if a power imbalance is an issue in relationships, no matter how small, show me one relationship where there is a perfect balance and I will name you a liar. An extrovert will likely have a stronger position over an introvert, for example. Or the one earning more money. Or the one who is physically stronger. Or the one that is more clever.
I don't think that incestuous relationships are universally morally wrong, necessarily, just that it's harder to separate informed consent from grooming in such cases
 
Thread owner
my real life is an episode of jerry springer ... wrap this around your head.. before my mom was arrested for armed bank robbery in illinois she had my younger sister from my dads dad so what does that make me yo her. I on the other hand one cousin one aunt and one niece none of them was I the instigator
 
I grew up being the only child in the family. It's usual situation in my country. When I grew up, for some reason I was more interested in my peers. So I did not experience any incest issues.
As for incest-themed games, I tried Dating My Daughter, Sisterly Lust, Summertime Saga, Man of the House, Radiant. All of them ended up being deleted. I could only get myself to go through MotH completely, thanks to the sandbox elements. DMD, SL were just boring for me, Summertime Saga - not my fetishes (lactation, pregnancy) plus complaints about the graphics, as for MotH - just not a very mature game. Subsequent projects by this developer interested me to a much greater extent. Mystwood Manor I passed in vanilla version, without incest. So the “incest” tag doesn't seem to be for me.
 
I don't think that incestuous relationships are universally morally wrong, necessarily, just that it's harder to separate informed consent from grooming in such cases
Apologies, it seems I somewhat misinterpreted you. And the last bit in my post was me just venting some annoyance for bad arguments I've seen in the past.

Still, my main point stands. I don't see how determining consent is any different in incest cases than in any other case. If you were to look at a case of supposed consensual incest and then imagine those two people were not related, but just been in lifelong contact, it would not change the situation regarding abuse or lack thereof. Yes, abuse is more common in incest cases then the general population, due to the abusers access to victims, but that does not make the issue of informed consent any more difficult.
 
I am wondering if anyone here plays incest games because of past experiences with cousins or relatives.
Isn't it how we all got here? Or was it just a fantasy?
 
  • Heart
Reactions: :-(
I am wondering if anyone here plays incest games because of past experiences with cousins or relatives..
I wish I were this lucky...
 
Yep, it didn't help that my cousins were prettier than most girls I met at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: :-(
Sure am. Hentai game without incest isn't hentai game at all. Same with movies, books, novels etc.
 
The laws are written by humans, humans decide what is right and wrong. it can and will be easily rewritten again in the future, ngl
Welp we live in the now and not the future so laws still apply.
 
Welp we live in the now and not the future so laws still apply.
Stupid laws, stupid Blackrock, stupid Rockefeller's England, stupid Einstein's island, stupid Vatican
 
Back
Top Bottom