discussion Anyone else feel like AI art ruined porn?

[ツSisterSexualシ]

well making lewd photo of someone crush will bring some money i guess

Can't they make one for free in the popular midjourney or newest gpt version with the image-generation feature? there are some free versions out there made by users tho

 

[alkatraz91]

Can't they make one for free in the popular midjourney or newest gpt version with the image-generation feature? there are some free versions out there made by users tho

the result aren't good cause i train a model based on 10-15 photo and the result are very realistic

 

[therpfan]

The primary issue I see with AI art is that is flooded with low effort shit. Oh look, you typed in a sentence and then... Uploaded 800 images of the exact same thing. Great.

Yea, AI can be a powerful tool, but given how easy it is to access, low quality garbage just completely hides anything worth looking at. I just avoid it for the most part.

 

[draslimeil]

I have yet so see anything AI generated that doesn't look like total ass. And it doesn't help that it's being used in the laziest way possible.

 

[MattShizzle]

I think it could make it better once it improves and can make realistic looking models that look the same from scene to scene.

 

[chrisridley]

A short answer, no I think they'll be complementary, both will benefit.

 

[WigglyWorld84]

It improved porn, AI is only a tool, you decide how to use it, in dark or bright motives. Everyone can try to create their onw art, it's easier to draw a picture with a good draft/prompts from the AI, it does increase drawing and quality of the image.
I haven't seen / watched any porn made with AI alone. There were two or three AI JAV's but that's only it. Short video clips don't count

Well said.

It is also like Auto-tune. If used as a tool to enhance, it can be great. When used as a crutch, its painful.

 

[jbk304]

When done right AI art is pretty hot.

 

[NateDawg59]

AI isn't ruining porn, it's opening up more possibilities for it. What's screwy with it right now is all the weird cartoon photoshop type stuff that's all over the place. Loli with adult bodies, chiseled abs on petite figures, etc. Fake celeb movies have a bit to go still, but it's getting better about not looking exactly like someone pasted a celeb face on a normal porn movie.

 

[stangnomez]

One benefit for visual erotica, it makes it easy to identify the projects that may have had a good premise but would not have made it past 0.2

 

[lukethighwalker]

Pony Diffusion

 

[walld]

I do think it ruined celebrity images. Even when real images of them exist, the AI ones dominate the search result and are often very realistic. I want to see the real celebrity in a compromising position, not a spiffy drawing.

Who are celebrities? Just people turning a book/idea into a movie for our viewing pleasure.


The first movie actors and actresses were considered lower class citizens because "that's the only job they can get"? type beliefs. Porn actors are not chosen for their acting chops, but rather for their looks. If the availability of attractive actresses continues to decline for porn as more girls figure out porn is not for them, or that only fans is more lucrative, the porn industry will probably move to AI too.


What specific quality makes human actors higher value than AI actors, if the acting the same (yes, that last qualifier needs to be added)?


Movie studios will start moving to AI, probably starting with voices for animations, and then for animated characters in full movies. There is a new genre of JAV porn where AI completely replaces the actresses face for the entire movie. Still looks artificial at its core, but I believe the tech will advance quickly.


Consider the potential of "personalized porn" coming on the horizon. An actress to fit your preferences in looks and body style, and you as the director of what happens in the scene. Pausing when wanting, full 720 degree range angles with no restrictions on camera position, see through bodies, as in moving through the MC to see up close and personal any aspect, along with "internal" shots on command. The AI world will have leaps and bounds more capabilities than traditional porn, and some of that will carry over to Hollywood movies.

 

[user64451]

some of it is boring, but then some is really good. Now if only i could run it on my own pc

 

[walld]

i was thinking to open onlyfans showing my ai generated images, or make lewd images of random girl.

Don't some twitch streamers do this? Overlay an AI character visual and voice? I thought one of the overweight Japanese twitch streamers with a pretty huge following had a glitch that exposed him. He was using a petite waifu as his avatar.

 

[AlBetGam]

Ruined? No.

Drastically lowered the skill bar for anyone wanting to produce it? Yes. Which means- as with any other tool- a vast number of people churning out mostly schlock, and 10-20% gems. But that's not really a new phenomenon. Look at how many utterly trash Koitaku + Renpy games there are out there. Or sloppy HTML games with screenshots (the same 10) real porn stars. But there's still genuinely good stuff out there. Just more stuff to weed out before you get to it.

 

[NateDawg59]

some of it is boring, but then some is really good. Now if only i could run it on my own pc

The day your average user can access and run these programs on their home PCs, is the day porn sites die.

 

[cszero]

I disagree, AI is there to facilitate and help developers

 

[tyktamsyl]

Well I actually have an opinion on this that I think I haven't seen very often. I think AI porn is fine, and I myself have generated some really good images (Which I have never posted). HOWEVER, I think the mass majority of people who generate AI H-content probably pick the first thing they like and ship it onto some website. I know AI art can be good, but it seems to me most people who generate AI art don't put the effort into it to make it look unique. Most AI generated content I see on websites has the same generic art style of some generic chick in a generic scene.

It kind of frustrates me because it just takes minimal effort to make something awesome, and yet we still have really low effort posts.

All that said, I see the tides shifting. Just the other day I saw someone who posted something that I couldn't immediately discern to be AI art. I think people are starting to shine through with a little more effort, and really that's all it takes. Just learn to use Lora, checkpoints, etc. and I think AI art suddenly doesn't suck anymore and is sometimes indiscernible from art made by a person.

Well either people are getting better at utilizing it or the base technology is getting a lot better for the noobs.

 

[NateDawg59]

That's the fear everyone has, making something that is extremely hard to tell whether it's real or not. From porn to celeb endorsements and fake news footage, it's going to cause a lot of trouble for some time. But, like most technologies, you can't put the genie back in the bottle.

 

[draslimeil]

Well I actually have an opinion on this that I think I haven't seen very often. I think AI porn is fine, and I myself have generated some really good images (Which I have never posted). HOWEVER, I think the mass majority of people who generate AI H-content probably pick the first thing they like and ship it onto some website. I know AI art can be good, but it seems to me most people who generate AI art don't put the effort into it to make it look unique. Most AI generated content I see on websites has the same generic art style of some generic chick in a generic scene.

It kind of frustrates me because it just takes minimal effort to make something awesome, and yet we still have really low effort posts.

All that said, I see the tides shifting. Just the other day I saw someone who posted something that I couldn't immediately discern to be AI art. I think people are starting to shine through with a little more effort, and really that's all it takes. Just learn to use Lora, checkpoints, etc. and I think AI art suddenly doesn't suck anymore and is sometimes indiscernible from art made by a person.

Well either people are getting better at utilizing it or the base technology is getting a lot better for the noobs.

Nail on the head. People hate the laziness that it enables more than the tech itself. The inconsistency and other issues might get ironed out with time and better tech, but not people who don't bother putting in the effort to do something properly.