2 Years of Service
But where has that finger been?You must be registered to see attachments
Unless they are a finger...
You must be registered to see attachments
Attachments
You must be registered for see attachments list
But where has that finger been?You must be registered to see attachments
Unless they are a finger...
You must be registered to see attachments
Happy Thursday LucidDream!You must be registered to see attachments
Hello Everyone Happy Thursday.
Hello friend!Recovering and getting better everyday now! I wish I could spend more time here with my friends <3
During all this process, I've been playing a lot with my Switch... How about you?
You must be registered to see attachments
Night here! Basically going to sleep soonGood morning/afternoon/evening you lewdie how is it going?
Good Night Ciri!Good night all
Bye, Captain!You must be registered to see attachmentsYou must be registered to see attachments
Hahahaha.. hey, wait..As far as I'm concerned all thumbs are fingers but not all fingers are thumbs.
Unless @Evil Surgeon has been at it again...
I don't think I'm familiar with the rule you're talking about.Hmmm, this is very interesting. I suppose they didn't want to make up new characters. But something is still off. I'm talking about the 3-6-9 rule. Everything in the world is encapsulated in that.
Nothing's off, our current application and notation for hexadecimal (and the word itself) just date back less than a hundred years. It was standardized in a culture where base 10 was already ubiquitous on a subliminal level; it's taught to people who have been counting in tens for their entire life.Even with hexadecimal. Sure, there's "new characters", but hexadecimal as a name bind base 16 to being within 0-9 still. In terms of speach and our understanding of it. It is base 16 because it is 6+10=16. Hexa (6) and decimal (10). I'm saying even if its base 16 and has different characters that aren't 0-9, it still is ruled and governed by the fact that it is hexadecimal (10+6=16 making it base 16).
Sure you have... we just call that one "thumb"I have never heard of opposable fingers
I don't understand half of the things you guys are discussing...I don't think I'm familiar with the rule you're talking about.
Nothing's off, our current application and notation for hexadecimal (and the word itself) just date back less than a hundred years. It was standardized in a culture where base 10 was already ubiquitous on a subliminal level; it's taught to people who have been counting in tens for their entire life.
This isn't an inherent trait of math in other words, it's an artifact of the anthropological context in which we're using that math. If we came from a long line of civilizations that defaulted to calculating things in base 16 (cause, I dunno, 4 fingers instead of 5), we'd have 16 unique digits and kids in school would get headaches remembering that you had to leave 6 of them out to do computer stuff in base 10.
Sure you have... we just call that one "thumb"
You're brain can't hurt, though! You lost your mind years ago. This is just a case of phantom organ syndrome.I don't understand half of the things you guys are discussing...
In my ignorance, I will just call for @HarelM help...
Does this talk has any foundation? Or the lewdites are just talking random things and facts?
![]()
That makes more sense.You're brain can't hurt, though! You lost your mind years ago. This is just a case of phantom organ syndrome.![]()
Base 10 is so ingrained custom that we call 0 to 9 just digits, but not other symbols. Someone could've came up with custom symbols for going past 9 in base 16 but probably thought a-f is easier for people to remember.Does this talk has any foundation? Or the lewdites are just talking random things and facts?
You really shouldn't have agreed to see the specialist @Evil Surgeon recommended...
Like the Romans? With their III and V numbers?Base 10 is so ingrained custom that we call 0 to 9 just digits, but not other symbols. Someone could've came up with custom symbols for going past 9 in base 16 but probably thought a-f is easier for people to remember.
![]()
I think this responds everythingYou really shouldn't have agreed to see the specialist @Evil Surgeon recommended...
You must be registered to see attachments
You know, I'm starting to think someone oughtta review that guy's medical license...You really shouldn't have agreed to see the specialist @Evil Surgeon recommended...
You must be registered to see attachments
Oho no, I'm ready for you this time.Hahahaha.. hey, wait..
I would say I'll try not to kill you.. but..
Have a good night!Goodnight everyone enjoy the rest of the night.
You might want to give it some BeanO, though...Like the Romans? With their III and V numbers?
Or I'm getting crazy? Was I crazy already?
![]()
![]()
I think this responds everything
![]()
It's interesting that people are arguing about numerical symbols on an instrument where EVERYTHING boils down to ones and zeros It's a binary language, composed of sequences of 0s and 1s, representing instructions for the hardware. Every other programming language needs to be translated into machine code for the computer to execute.There are other numeral systems- e.g. Roman numerals where you have less symbols and represent larger values with positioning- but you're just not likely to run across any of them in regular use.
Yess, my point exactly. If " If we came from a long line of civilizations that defaulted to calculating things in base 16 (cause, I dunno, 4 fingers instead of 5), we'd have 16 unique digits" but we don't. I'm saying I think that's a manufacturing of this reality and I think to a certain extent everything else is based on that manufacturing.I don't think I'm familiar with the rule you're talking about.
Nothing's off, our current application and notation for hexadecimal (and the word itself) just date back less than a hundred years. It was standardized in a culture where base 10 was already ubiquitous on a subliminal level; it's taught to people who have been counting in tens for their entire life.
This isn't an inherent trait of math in other words, it's an artifact of the anthropological context in which we're using that math. If we came from a long line of civilizations that defaulted to calculating things in base 16 (cause, I dunno, 4 fingers instead of 5), we'd have 16 unique digits and kids in school would get headaches remembering that you had to leave 6 of them out to do computer stuff in base 10.
Sure you have... we just call that one "thumb"
Agree!It's interesting that people are arguing about numerical symbols on an instrument where EVERYTHING boils down to ones and zeros It's a binary language, composed of sequences of 0s and 1s, representing instructions for the hardware. Every other programming language needs to be translated into machine code for the computer to execute.
You must be registered to see attachments
I want a fucking bed!You might want to give it some BeanO, though...
You must be registered to see attachments
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files