discussion Squirting: a rant

[Earlybird]

You may wonder why I'm mentioning all this. It's because Henry Darger and his penis-having Vivian Girls are what I think of every time I see squirting. It seems congruent - this masculising of the female orgasm, this idea that there is and must be a female equivalent to male ejaculation, despite the absence of any biological or evolutionary basis.

If wanting to be squirted by a chick makes you gay from the "Masculinization" of ejaculation. Just call me Richard Simmons.

 

[sourpuss]

Sorry, my dude, but this is just plain factually incorrect.

'Female ejaculation' is mechanically-induced excretion of a quantity in the single-figure millilitres of, largely, sweat and urea. Neither picture you've posted depicts female ejaculation (the second one is most likely lube). But that's all by-the-by; the rest of your post is agreeing with me in a hostile tone, which, fine.

 

[sourpuss]

If wanting to be squirted by a chick makes you gay from the "Masculinization" of ejaculation. Just call me Richard Simmons.

I didn't say it 'makes you gay'. I said it masculises the female orgasm, which I would've thought fairly uncontroversial.

 

[lord_xenu]

'Female ejaculation' is mechanically-induced excretion of a quantity in the single-figure millilitres of, largely, sweat and urea. Neither picture you've posted depicts female ejaculation (the second one is most likely lube). But that's all by-the-by; the rest of your post is agreeing with me in a hostile tone, which, fine.

After conducting hundreds of studies, Zaviacic concluded that the fluid comes from the female prostate gland. His book, The Human Female Prostate (

You must be registered to see links

), cites most of his anatomical studies as well as chemical analysis of the fluid. This fluid has been analyzed chemically by many, such as Addiego and colleagues (

You must be registered to see links

), Zaviacic and colleagues (

You must be registered to see links

), Belzer, Whipple, and Moger (), and Rubio-Casillas and Jannini (), all of whom found that the chemical components of the ejaculated fluid were significantly different from urine from the same subjects. Specifically, the ejaculate contains high levels of prostatic acid phosphatase, prostatic specific antigen, glucose, and fructose, but low levels of urea and creatinine. The chemical composition of healthy urine is the opposite of female ejaculate, so they are easily differentiated from each other. That is, healthy urine contains high levels of urea and creatinine and no prostatic acid phosphatase or glucose. (Of course, the urine of persons with diabetes may contain glucose.)

.

 

[Solamenteforjogos]

Never before have I read such an unreasonably strong opinion about such trivial topic

 

[InvaderZim]

Wifey do both types of squirting. The most common one is, yes, mostly urine. But they've done studies on this, and when analyzed there's not *just* urine in it, there's also ejaculate. And as orgasms go, they are most definitely distinct. Sometimes she will have one of those squirts described above, thick, white semen looking. You cannot mistake it for something else. She does not feel these as an orgasm though, as far as I know.

 

[sourpuss]

After conducting hundreds of studies, Zaviacic concluded that the fluid comes from the female prostate gland. His book, The Human Female Prostate (

You must be registered to see links

), cites most of his anatomical studies as well as chemical analysis of the fluid. This fluid has been analyzed chemically by many, such as Addiego and colleagues (

You must be registered to see links

), Zaviacic and colleagues (

You must be registered to see links

), Belzer, Whipple, and Moger (), and Rubio-Casillas and Jannini (), all of whom found that the chemical components of the ejaculated fluid were significantly different from urine from the same subjects. Specifically, the ejaculate contains high levels of prostatic acid phosphatase, prostatic specific antigen, glucose, and fructose, but low levels of urea and creatinine. The chemical composition of healthy urine is the opposite of female ejaculate, so they are easily differentiated from each other. That is, healthy urine contains high levels of urea and creatinine and no prostatic acid phosphatase or glucose. (Of course, the urine of persons with diabetes may contain glucose.)

.

From your link:

>Female ejaculation refers to about a teaspoon (3–5 cc) of fluid expelled through the urethra

The second picture you posted, purporting to show female ejaculation, contains significantly (order of magnitude) more fluid than your source indicates. As I said, single-digit millilitres. You are still agreeing with me in a hostile tone.

FWIW urea is not strictly synonymous with urine, urea is found in urine in high amounts, though.

 

[shimi]

I had a dodgy curry and ended up squirting all night

 

[maestromancer]

I had a dodgy curry and ended up squirting all night

Solidarity brother

 

[shimi]

Solidarity brother

Nothing solid coming out yet

 

[Earlybird]

I didn't say it 'makes you gay'. I said it masculises the female orgasm, which I would've thought fairly uncontroversial.

I know bro, twas just a joke. I for one, find it admirable for you to go up against the Big Squirt Industry.

 

[User_36484]

From the 1930s to the 1960s, Henry Darger worked as a custodian in a Chicago hospital. He lived alone and kept to himself. When he died in 1971, his landlord found a hand-written and watercolour-illustrated manuscript of over 15,000 pages, detailing the adventures of the seven 'Vivian Girls' - rebel child slaves in a fantasy setting. He's considered one of the core figures in what's called 'outsider art'.

There are many odd features to the manuscript, not least of which is that the Vivian Girls - and all girls in the story - are depicted as having penises. It's worth noting that they do not also have vaginas; they only have penises. Darger was not a pioneering futa-lover. In all probability, he drew the girls with penises because he thought girls had penises, because no-one had ever told him otherwise.

You may wonder why I'm mentioning all this. It's because Henry Darger and his penis-having Vivian Girls are what I think of every time I see squirting. It seems congruent - this masculising of the female orgasm, this idea that there is and must be a female equivalent to male ejaculation, despite the absence of any biological or evolutionary basis.

I'm not here to insult anyone. If you like squirting, fine, enjoy. But it is absolutely everywhere now and I'm about convinced some group of squirting enthusiasts are pooling their money and pledging to devs at high tiers to get them to include it.

I find it absolutely, alienatingly off-putting. I've tried to think of a comparison - imagine if there was a fetish for girls suddenly growing thick, full beards right as they cum. Just instantaneously going all ZZ Top right when they climax. The beard-hairs would all fall out very quickly, of course - in like ten, fifteen seconds, say. But they grow a beard every time they cum. It's how you can tell they've cum. That's just what happens when girls cum. They instantaneously grow a thick beard which immediately falls out.

And suppose, suddenly, that that was in every game you played. That more and more of the games you play have this bizarre, repugnant content requiring you to accept this wholly fictional absurdity. And then one day you find you can't think of a game that doesn't have it.

So there you go, rant over. Squirting: it's bad, folks!

Squirt is piss. I don't understand how some people don't know that yet.

 

[lord_xenu]

From your link:

>Female ejaculation refers to about a teaspoon (3–5 cc) of fluid expelled through the urethra

The second picture you posted, purporting to show female ejaculation, contains significantly (order of magnitude) more fluid than your source indicates. As I said, single-digit millilitres. You are still agreeing with me in a hostile tone.

FWIW urea is not strictly synonymous with urine, urea is found in urine in high amounts, though.

The average male ejaculation is about 2.5 ml, with 95% of men ejaculating between 0.5 and 5.5 mL per orgasm.

You must be registered to see links

Maybe you're just telling on yourself about your low sperm count but I've definitely cum a higher volume of sperm than the actress in the picture.

Also, I'm not agreeing with you. I'm saying that female ejaculate is a real thing that's sometimes faked for porn while you are saying that there is no biological or evolutionary basis for it.

 

[sourpuss]

The average male ejaculation is about 2.5 ml, with 95% of men ejaculating between 0.5 and 5.5 mL per orgasm.

You must be registered to see links

Maybe you're just telling on yourself about your low sperm count but I've definitely cum a higher volume of sperm than the actress in the picture.

Also, I'm not agreeing with you. I'm saying that female ejaculate is a real thing that's sometimes faked for porn while you are saying that there is no biological or evolutionary basis for it.

1) It's just a question of what you understand to be meant by 'a teaspoon'. If you think you could fit the liquid in your second picture into a teaspoon, you're using some very large teaspoons.

2) My post, thread and opinion are not concerned with female ejaculation but with squirting. The former is a real, though unremarkable phenomenon, while the latter is a fictional trope of pornography. Now, this isn't my first barbecue and I'm very familiar with squirting devotees trying to use female ejaculation as a 'basis' for squirting. I'm not obliged to take it any more seriously than I would take the real-world fact that women do indeed have facial hair as a basis for the comparison I offered in the OP.

 

[MattShizzle]

After conducting hundreds of studies, Zaviacic concluded that the fluid comes from the female prostate gland. His book, The Human Female Prostate (

You must be registered to see links

), cites most of his anatomical studies as well as chemical analysis of the fluid. This fluid has been analyzed chemically by many, such as Addiego and colleagues (

You must be registered to see links

), Zaviacic and colleagues (

You must be registered to see links

), Belzer, Whipple, and Moger (), and Rubio-Casillas and Jannini (), all of whom found that the chemical components of the ejaculated fluid were significantly different from urine from the same subjects. Specifically, the ejaculate contains high levels of prostatic acid phosphatase, prostatic specific antigen, glucose, and fructose, but low levels of urea and creatinine. The chemical composition of healthy urine is the opposite of female ejaculate, so they are easily differentiated from each other. That is, healthy urine contains high levels of urea and creatinine and no prostatic acid phosphatase or glucose. (Of course, the urine of persons with diabetes may contain glucose.)

.

More recent studies have shown it's (at least usually) mostly urine when it's actual squirting.

 

[dora_the_destroyer]

since i know that squirting is mainly peeing.. where else would that fluid come from.. its absolutely not my thing... i reeeally dislike it.. just like golden shower ya know..

yes.. yes it is! i had a girlfriend who kept "squirtiung" and you could clearly smell it was pee.. i just couldn't bring myself to tell her i knew cuz you know she did it to make me happy

 

[anonvonbron]

Your rant made me squirt

 

[User_62717]

One the things I notice in games and 3D videos is this idea that women can get so turned on they start dripping. I've never seen a woman get so wet in real life. Most of the time you there isn't even visual evidence she is wet. Point being, every time I see that trope I think, "damn what kind of venereal disease does she have that causes so much discharge?"

 

[Bro69]

Squirting yes, pissing? um maybe not

 

[kogmerz]

It looks hot. Brain is off