Except for 1: WVMGames that make insane amounts of money have protection from any kind of criticism. That is the only thing on F95 that I really don't like.
That’s exactly what I meant: users who have never worked for the site really can't speak to this. Whether it’s R7’s bullshit,or the community, or people getting banned for no reason... because of that R7 coin-flip decision method, banned today, allowed back tomorrow, banned again the day after...Especially when it comes to loli games... Rebel is a loli game developer and knows exactly what I mean...He understand me...I've just posted this on Itchio. I won't be surprised that the user trying to promote CuckZone is the owner of CuckZone(F95Z). The owner has a Deadpool aviatar as well.
You must be registered to see attachmentsYou must be registered to see attachments
No, that’s not the problem.Take *Insexual Awakening*, for example... it was banned and later allowed again...With *Sorcery Kingdom*, it’s the other way around... it was allowed under R7 and is now banned...The problem is how they decide which games get banned. I bet even they can't make sense of it anymore and just flip a coin.i think because they ban a lot of games that shouldnt be ban
Problem is they are selective in how they enforce the (somewhat vague) rules and they tend to delete the negative reviews for certain games (those rules are so vague they can delete virtually anything.)And I really like that site. At least for me, this is the main source of updates for the games I follow. Another strong point is the availability of game reviews. Among the garbage there are also very sensible, large reviews, which are useful to get acquainted with. I have never had any problems there since I registered in May 2018, I just carefully followed the rules of the site, just as I try to follow them here. To cut off possible questions, I prefer vanilla games, what is presented here in the "+" section does not interest me.
Of my 26 reviews, none have been deleted. Of these, 17 were severely negative in relation to the games in question. I understand that it should be a great shame if the review is deleted, since creating a large text with an analysis of the game in question takes (in my case) 2.5 - 3 hours of pure time. But so far, fate has been merciful.Problem is they are selective in how they enforce the (somewhat vague) rules and they tend to delete the negative reviews for certain games (those rules are so vague they can delete virtually anything.)
It also prevents you from rereviewing that game. Some of the really bad ones with a cult like following (like A Wife and Mother - the very definition of blueballing) are like ultra protected.Of my 26 reviews, none have been deleted. Of these, 17 were severely negative in relation to the games in question. I understand that it should be a great shame if the review is deleted, since creating a large text with an analysis of the game in question takes (in my case) 2.5 - 3 hours of pure time. But so far, fate has been merciful.
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files