discussion Women on this site?

[vixifairy]

I mean, probably the simplest definition of a woman is an individual whose sense of identity aligns with characteristically feminine societal and/or cultural roles and traits.

then im deff not a woman.. but i am a female. so theres that!

 

[WLMS]

I think that's one of those numbered "rlues of the internet", like rule 34 is that there's porn for everything.

Rule n°30

 

[Nastastic]

I mean, probably the simplest definition of a woman is an individual whose sense of identity aligns with characteristically feminine societal and/or cultural roles and traits.

Cultural enforcement of a certain narrow "traditional" definition of femininity (or masculinity) married to biological gender is probably at least half the reason we have so many people (mostly under 50) claiming to be "nonbinary" and such because they don't find themselves on the places on the graph where their genitalia matches the behaviors and interests that "traditional" society says belong with those genitalia (men like cars and guns and sports and violence and hate emotions other than anger and must be cool, aloof and macho at all times while women like pink and knitting and braiding hair and talking about feelings and periods with their girlfriends and hate dirt and must always have their hair and nails and makeup done, that kind of shit).

People would have a lot less trouble figuring out what gender they are if everyone accepted my definition of gender. You have a penis? Yes. You want to keep it? Yes. Congratulations, you are male and a man. Let nobody tell you otherwise. Doesn't matter how much you love wearing dresses and makeup, etc., if you have a dick and have no desire for "gender affirming" surgery to get rid of it, you are a dude. Similarly, if you have a pussy and want to keep it, congratulations, you are female and a woman. You can be a lumberjack and not shave your pits, doesn't make you less a chick. (The only exception would be the truly transgender who just don't want to surgically butcher their genitalia and get rid of a working orgasmic and/or reproductive system for a bad imitation of what they weren't equipped with to start.)

 

[Loliholic]

All this finetuning is annoying.
I prefer the natural definition, if you have a dick aka male sex you cant be female. If you dont have one you are female...or an eunuch, depends if you have a pussy aka female sex or not.
Plain and easy without the need to redefine or tune stuff away from the facts.

 

[Hexborn_Magus]

surgically butcher their genitalia and get rid of a working orgasmic and/or reproductive system for a bad imitation of what they weren't equipped with to start.)

Surgery isn't butchering, and trans people with bottom surgery are perfectly capable of orgasms. I can tell you lack knowledge of this area.

Also, defining if someone is a man or a woman based on genitals is even worse than cultural identity, as we have proof at this point that the brains of trans people more closely align physically with the brains of the sex they identify as, and since the brain matters far more in determining who you are as a person than literally any other part of the body that you can lose and replace, it really should be the only thing that matters in what a person's identity is.

Unfortunately, we can't just do hundreds of millions of brain scans to determine if every single person has the same sex brain as their body, or the opposite, or something in between, so the most pragmatic thing to do is just let people say what they identify as, and respect it. If a trans woman says they're a woman and still has a dick, they're a woman. Nothing else really matters. It especially shouldn't matter to a community of people on the internet using names that aren't the same as what's on their birth certificate, using pictures that don't look anything like they do in their family album.

 

[Nastastic]

Surgery isn't butchering, and trans people with bottom surgery are perfectly capable of orgasms.

Usually. At least in the case of transwomen. I am familiar with the way penile tissue is repurposed to line a neovagina. Not sure if they can salvage enough clitoral tissue to make an orgasmic neopenis for a transman, but I know they need either a Gumby-like wire insert or else a hand pump in order to get an "erection". And complcations can happen during surgery, especially when dealing with nerves, and there is a nonzero probability of lost or decreased sensation after surgery. Plus there is the fact that surgically-constructed fake genitals are simply not as good as the real thing, in any way. Transwomen cannot have multiple orgasms like ciswomen because they have a male refactory period in the penile tissue that lines the neovagina, and can only orgasm from penetration since that is how the penile tissue is stimulated (you're basically fucking a sectioned and inverted dick). Also, they can't get wet on their own and must use artificial lubricant.

Also, defining if someone is a man or a woman based on genitals is even worse than cultural identity, as we have proof at this point that the brains of trans people more closely align physically with the brains of the sex they identify as, and since the brain matters far more in determining who you are as a person than literally any other part of the body that you can lose and replace, it really should be the only thing that matters in what a person's identity is.

I'm talking about all the people who seem to think they have NO GENDER simply because their interests, presentation and predilections don't line up with those traditionally associated with their junk. If you feel that you ARE a gender, even the one that doesn't align with the parts you were born with, then that is your gender, as I even stated above in a statement you ignored except to take exception to my choice of words:

(The only exception would be the truly transgender who just don't want to surgically butcher their genitalia and get rid of a working orgasmic and/or reproductive system for a bad imitation of what they weren't equipped with to start.)

Unfortunately, we can't just do hundreds of millions of brain scans to determine if every single person has the same sex brain as their body, or the opposite, or something in between, so the most pragmatic thing to do is just let people say what they identify as, and respect it. If a trans woman says they're a woman and still has a dick, they're a woman. Nothing else really matters. It especially shouldn't matter to a community of people on the internet using names that aren't the same as what's on their birth certificate, using pictures that don't look anything like they do in their family album.

We mostly agree, although i don't think it should be controversial or offensive to state that transwomen are not exactly the same as ciswomen, nor are transmen exactly the same as cismen. There is a Venn diagram where they overlap, but Caitlyn Jenner still has most of the body of the (albeit elderly) high-performance male athlete she used to be (as Bruce Jenner) and Elliot Page did not grow four inches and gain 50 lbs the day he changed his name from Ellen.

 

[Dumblikeox]

this reminded me of

You must be registered to see attachments

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Loliholic]

Also, defining if someone is a man or a woman based on genitals is even worse than cultural identity, as we have proof at this point that the brains of trans people more closely align physically with the brains of the sex they identify as, and since the brain matters far more in determining who you are as a person than literally any other part of the body that you can lose and replace, it really should be the only thing that matters in what a person's identity is.

I dont see any proof because i dont crack peoples heads just to look at their brains. I'm also unable to read minds. All i see is a body with or without a dick.
Sorry if that sounds intolerant, but its a fact. Maybe trans people should focus their fights more to get their sex changes payed by health insurance instead of demanding from common people to ignore all their senses and just accept what they think they are - especially in women only areas like our shelter, changing rooms, gym showers, etc. because it doesnt matter what they are in their heads, it only matters what everyone else sees and my tolerance ends when i get confronted with dicks in explicitly dickfree areas.
On a sidenote, i cant believe "transwomen" who want to keep their dicks, because that only proves they prefer their biological gender.

 

[Ghost 👻]

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[HandholdDegen]

Surgery isn't butchering, and trans people with bottom surgery are perfectly capable of orgasms. I can tell you lack knowledge of this area.

Also, defining if someone is a man or a woman based on genitals is even worse than cultural identity, as we have proof at this point that the brains of trans people more closely align physically with the brains of the sex they identify as, and since the brain matters far more in determining who you are as a person than literally any other part of the body that you can lose and replace, it really should be the only thing that matters in what a person's identity is.

Unfortunately, we can't just do hundreds of millions of brain scans to determine if every single person has the same sex brain as their body, or the opposite, or something in between, so the most pragmatic thing to do is just let people say what they identify as, and respect it. If a trans woman says they're a woman and still has a dick, they're a woman. Nothing else really matters. It especially shouldn't matter to a community of people on the internet using names that aren't the same as what's on their birth certificate, using pictures that don't look anything like they do in their family album.

 

[Vibranium3000]

You must be registered to see attachments

why is it, that the rules of the internet apply on porn sides the most? But i do wonder the same some time.

 

[MattShizzle]

You must be registered to see attachments

why is it, that the rules of the internet apply on porn sides the most? But i do wonder the same some time.

Not too many women like porn. Their equivalent is text only - ie "romance novels." Obviously other places there ARE women (those of us who met people online, people we already know, celebrities, etc...) Of course there ARE actual female porn stars online, too. I wonder if that Jesse James twat cheated on Bonnie Rotten yet...

 

[Vibranium3000]

Not too many women like porn. Their equivalent is text only - ie "romance novels." Obviously other places there ARE women (those of us who met people online, people we already know, celebrities, etc...) Of course there ARE actual female porn stars online, too. I wonder if that Jesse James twat cheated on Bonnie Rotten yet...

Well, yeah, an ex of mine always wanted me to read some of them too. Its just written porn and these games are, well games and many have an equally compelling story, cant really compare them to normal porn, so they could enjoy stuff here too.

Of course, there are women on the internet, but they dont really use the INTERNET, you know what i mean? they only use generic apps, hard moderated social media, never even visited the actual website, let alone a not marginalized small forum. To be fair, most people in general dont, but even less women.

porn stars dont count, they are not interresting. interresting are the people in front of the screen, not the ones in front of the camera. i know that that the pornstar that gets all her holes filled is a degeneret, i wonder what the normal women with normal lifes do, but the amount of them here is sadly so low.

 

[Vibranium3000]

I like that she can be open about it here, other places she'd be attacked constantly despite those places having incest games hosted on them. In the modern era, incest on its own really shouldn't be condemned.

Word!! its wierd that today basicly everything is accepted but that isnt. Friend of mine had a rant about a girl making incestual comments about her cousin, nothing rapey or anything so i didnt get hit reaction.

 

[MattShizzle]

Well, yeah, an ex of mine always wanted me to read some of them too. Its just written porn and these games are, well games and many have an equally compelling story, cant really compare them to normal porn, so they could enjoy stuff here too.

Of course, there are women on the internet, but they dont really use the INTERNET, you know what i mean? they only use generic apps, hard moderated social media, never even visited the actual website, let alone a not marginalized small forum. To be fair, most people in general dont, but even less women.

porn stars dont count, they are not interresting. interresting are the people in front of the screen, not the ones in front of the camera. i know that that the pornstar that gets all her holes filled is a degeneret, i wonder what the normal women with normal lifes do, but the amount of them here is sadly so low.

A LOT of games are like "chick movies" - ie all yakking, no sex blue ball and boring.

 

[Loliholic]

Not too many women like porn.

What a load of bullshit.
Lots of women are into porn, especially the younger ones since they grew up with internet instead of VHS and society grew up a little in the last 50 years, woman are even allowed to enjoy sex today...and since at least the heteros dont get many chances to enjoy it rl (it takes more then 3 minutes guys), they do the same as you: google porn.
Sure, many may prefer different porn then most guys because they have some self respect and dont get off by stupid railed fuckmeat getting cumshowers, but thats why the amount of sensual porn grew in the last decades.

 

[MattShizzle]

What a load of bullshit.
Lots of women are into porn, especially the younger ones since they grew up with internet instead of VHS and society grew up a little in the last 50 years, woman are even allowed to enjoy sex today...and since at least the heteros dont get many chances to enjoy it rl (it takes more then 3 minutes guys), they do the same as you: google porn.
Sure, many may prefer different porn then most guys because they have some self respect and dont get off by stupid railed fuckmeat getting cumshowers, but thats why the amount of sensual porn grew in the last decades.

3 minutes??? Damn. Back when it still worked it took me a minimum 15 up to like 25+. Even when I was like 13-14 YO it took like 15. Women tend to get off more on text that pure visual (and audio.)

 

[Loliholic]

3 minutes??? Damn. Back when it still worked it took me a minimum 15 up to like 25+. Even when I was like 13-14 YO it took like 15. Women tend to get off more on text that pure visual (and audio.)

Dont get offended here, i dont do guys and the girls in our shelter obviously talk about selfish losers, except for the raped and pimped girls they all talk about low single digit numbers.

Its not the text, its the story ^^
Most porn is pretty boring, always the same few settings, always the same few intros, always the same few body types and always the same few sex positions. Most guys dont need more then that, just some meat to fap to. Women prefer some build up.

 

[MattShizzle]

Dont get offended here, i dont do guys and the girls in our shelter obviously talk about selfish losers, except for the raped and pimped girls they all talk about low single digit numbers.

Its not the text, its the story ^^
Most porn is pretty boring, always the same few settings, always the same few intros, always the same few body types and always the same few sex positions. Most guys dont need more then that, just some meat to fap to. Women prefer some build up.

Guys don't even need THAT first thing in the morning. Well, most guys. For me 40+ years type 1 diabetes nothing works short of unaffordable pills that Medicare doesn't cover...

 

[fullreview]

You must be registered to see attachments

why is it, that the rules of the internet apply on porn sides the most? But i do wonder the same some time.

This is true