Theme editor

  • RequestStream Movies, TV shows and anime streaming • 1 week trial
  • LewdCorner Site Cleanup Update
    A new cleanup update has been posted covering the recent Vault rework, rank changes, policy cleanup, and theme polish. The goal is to make LC cleaner, easier to understand, and safer for the site going forward. - Jack Of Blades
    Read More

What's your take on incest games that have a side girl as the first sex scene?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dartred
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies Replies 179
  • Views Views 8K
I never care for side girl but I understand why some devs add the feature. Development costs alot of money and vaginal sex sells. Many games out there with incest sex might not have ever reached that level of development without that vaginal sex hook through a side girl.
 
don't want to give you the incest sex scene too early
Incest without incest isn't incest at all!!!!
You must be registered to see attachments
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Well in my opinion if its an incest game it should be a Harem game and if that's the case there is no side girl.
 
I don't like completely unimportant side girl sex scenes. If she's an actual part of the game, sure, but if she's just there to show a sex scene before the dev gets to the actualy LIs and throws the one from the start away then meh...
 
Seems a lot of devs would make incest games, but they don't want to give you the incest sex scene too early. So they add in side girls to give you quick to get to sex scenes.

Thoughts? My personal opinion is that it's done to give you a throwaway character to try and keep your interest in the game, but it's not why i'm there for it. I'm a patient man and can wait a few chapter for the sex, so long as the build up is good and we get into close call situations until we get there. Adding characters just to be a quick sex attention grabber feels cheap to me.
If it is done in a way that fits into the story, I don't have an issue with it, but there have been a few games that just decided to avoid running into that by just cock blocking the MC several times
 
It's better to wait for the scene with the main girl than to force one with a random LI.
 
I think it works as a great way of showing players what to expect from the sex scenes in the future with the main LIs. I'd look forward to seeing the Mains in that position from memory, rather than imagination
 
I like character relations to be built up over time regardless of incest. Building sexual tension does a lot more for me than a quickie in the toilets (which seems to be a popular trope).
Having to develop the relationship through choices and actions for me make the best VN.
 
If they add additional characters after getting all the scenes with the main ones, then why not
 
If there are 2 main girls then one should be fast paced. I don't mind if the second one drags on a bit.
 
I don't mind it. It's even better when the side girl joins in the action later in the story.
 
i don't mind it at all, i do mind if i have to wait 20 releases to see some incest action in an incest tagged game
 
If I play an incest game, I want to play it. Adding secondary characters reduces the content of the main characters.
 
If it's a best friend or girlfriend character that will be a main LI I think it's fine. If it's just a random one off characters I'd rather just not have a scene
 
immediately think "i'm here for the incest, why i do the side character first?"
 
I don't mind, I even think it could give an idea of what the quality of future scenes will be like, whether they will be static or animated.
 
Back
Top Bottom