discussion toxic lunna 2 faced banned

[SilentHunter]

I personally did not suffer from the ban of this person in any way, since he published mainly Japanese games that I was not interested in at all, but the aftertaste from this story, of course, remained very, very unpleasant. And for fans of Japanese games, this is a very strong blow, and I sincerely sympathize with them.

 

[MattShizzle]

I noticed that person was constantly doing low level "firing back" after the big warning from Severed Realms a while back.

 

[NeoStarr]

If they were pushing boundaries good riddance. This place has a lot more patience than others. Other places don't even allow the names of other sites to be written in their forums let alone comparing them. It's night and day basically

 

[MattShizzle]

If they were pushing boundaries good riddance. This place has a lot more patience than others. Other places don't even allow the names of other sites to be written in their forums let alone comparing them. It's night and day basically

Only 2 they autochange it here and that's Fuck95 and the Fallen site. 1st one because they ban any mention of this site (and auto correct it to all asterisks.) Not sure why for the other one.

 

[Tripod70]

as mime said + i don't think staff/mods/admin see the blocked name of sites / words.
i think they see its original form.

Actually No! it is through out.. What we see in Reports gets zapped too...

 

[Miss Pain]

I saw the image in the OP, and I understand the need for a penalty—I’m not saying that no penalty would be appropriate—but I feel that if you were going to delete posts, it would have been sufficient to remove just the promotional ones, rather than everything...

Is it possible for you to at least restore the content this person uploaded?

You’ve effectively removed everything this individual contributed to your community.

And hey, you didn’t just ban me, you disabled my account.

You must be registered to see attachments

Look, I’m just trying to have a reasonable conversation with you. Is that even possible—can one express a different opinion without immediately getting their account suspended?

and my main account is not longer usable because you have disabled him

but its nice from you that I can tell you my opinion NOW without immediately getting disabled/banned, which are pretty much the same thing

Did they delete all of Luna’s content? Bruh

 

[Gashly]

Benis.

 

[OmgWhatIsGone2]

keep on lunas cock cuck.

clearly you didnt see the image in the OP of him blatantly advertising.

i dont understand the owner, If differing opinions are a problem for him, why doesn't he include something like this...

You must be registered to see attachments

or this

You must be registered to see attachments

I mean, if someone is so bothered by advertisements from other pirate sites that they start banning everyone who posts such ads—or anyone who simply holds a different opinion—why don't they just implement something like this?

They could censor registrations and every single post; that way, nothing like this could ever happen to them.

They could easily take a page out of the books of other pirate sites:

cuckzone does it this way.
WTF does it this way.
WTF does it this way.

 

[OmgWhatIsGone2]

Did they delete all of Luna’s content? Bruh

yes the user pissed him so much off that he deleted all lunas content, that is exactly what happened

My concern is that if the owner gets pissed off at a game developer, he might end up deleting all the threads related to that game; his behavior has shown that something like that could happen.

 

[pgm_01]

RL has kept me busy for the past few days and I log in here

 

[flipoff42]

So, what is the current policy around mentioning that specific games are available on certain sites in cases where those games are locked behind members+ on this one? I'd understand if that's frowned on, due to potentially redirecting traffic, and I get why those games are hidden here and don't really disagree with that decision. It just feels a bit bad to watch someone be frustrated that they can't get to specific locked games when I could tell them where the game isn't locked.

Edit: To be clear, it's not about saying one site is better or advertising a site. Simply an "oh, you can't get that here? I got my copy over there."

 

[Miss Pain]

So, what is the current policy around mentioning that specific games are available on certain sites in cases where those games are locked behind members+ on this one? I'd understand if that's frowned on, due to potentially redirecting traffic, and I get why those games are hidden here and don't really disagree with that decision. It just feels a bit bad to watch someone be frustrated that they can't get to specific locked games when I could tell them where the game isn't locked.

Edit: To be clear, it's not about saying one site is better or advertising a site. Simply an "oh, you can't get that here? I got my copy over there."

Direct messages exist.

 

[OmgWhatIsGone2]

Direct messages exist.

direct messages is also against his advertising rules

and direct messages are also censored

So, what is the current policy around mentioning that specific games are available on certain sites in cases where those games are locked behind members+ on this one? I'd understand if that's frowned on, due to potentially redirecting traffic, and I get why those games are hidden here and don't really disagree with that decision. It just feels a bit bad to watch someone be frustrated that they can't get to specific locked games when I could tell them where the game isn't locked.

Edit: To be clear, it's not about saying one site is better or advertising a site. Simply an "oh, you can't get that here? I got my copy over there."

Personally, this bothers me on other "pirate" sites as well—even on that other site we aren't allowed to mention, games featuring "loli" or "shota" content are at least categorized within a specific "Forbidden Haven" section. Honestly, censoring other websites won't stop people from leaving; if anything, that kind of behavior only fuels the exodus. Many people come here either because they’re looking for a specific game or because they’re fed up with the moderation on other pirate sites. Given that recent events show the moderators here are just as prone to "power trips," this won't stop users from moving on elsewhere.

Personally, I’d advise the owner to drop the censorship of other websites, as well as the practice of manipulating or "liking" his own threads. He has access to staff tools—like the ability to "log in as a user"—and I’m concerned he might be using them to manipulate his own posts.

Oh, and I suppose I could suggest that you donate 20 dollars directly into the owner’s personal pocket—that’ll get you quick access to the games hidden behind a paywall.

 

[highlrecommend]

Always a big fan of transparency in moderation, people getting nuked without any kind of notice or explanation to them, or to the community, is one of the worst things management can do, and evidently Lunna was enough of a figure and a nuisance to warrant not just a moderation log entry, but a proper explanation as to what the drama here and elsewhere was about

that luna person has been banned from every site they've been on, there is only one left & I'm sure that their narcissistic personality will shine through & they will be banned there too.

 

[highlrecommend]

direct messages is also against his advertising rules

and direct messages are also censored


Personally, this bothers me on other "pirate" sites as well—even on that other site we aren't allowed to mention, games featuring "loli" or "shota" content are at least categorized within a specific "Forbidden Haven" section. Honestly, censoring other websites won't stop people from leaving; if anything, that kind of behavior only fuels the exodus. Many people come here either because they’re looking for a specific game or because they’re fed up with the moderation on other pirate sites. Given that recent events show the moderators here are just as prone to "power trips," this won't stop users from moving on elsewhere.

Personally, I’d advise the owner to drop the censorship of other websites, as well as the practice of manipulating or "liking" his own threads. He has access to staff tools—like the ability to "log in as a user"—and I’m concerned he might be using them to manipulate his own posts.

Oh, and I suppose I could suggest that you donate 20 dollars directly into the owner’s personal pocket—that’ll get you quick access to the games hidden behind a paywall.

that's a pretty derogatory post for someone that just happened to "Join Today at 3:32 AM "

 

[Skate_Mane]

lmao

 

[Redyscom]

Only 2 they autochange it here and that's Fuck95 and the Fallen site. 1st one because they ban any mention of this site (and auto correct it to all asterisks.) Not sure why for the other one.

Someone already explained the reason: it revolves around a paraphilia that is defended and supported there, and it’s frowned upon to be associated with people like that. I have nothing against that community, everyone is free to do whatever they want as long as they don’t harm others, but that’s just the way it is.

Personally, for me... there were two incidents involving that community that left me with a negative impression of them.

So, what is the current policy around mentioning that specific games are available on certain sites in cases where those games are locked behind members+ on this one? I'd understand if that's frowned on, due to potentially redirecting traffic, and I get why those games are hidden here and don't really disagree with that decision. It just feels a bit bad to watch someone be frustrated that they can't get to specific locked games when I could tell them where the game isn't locked.

Edit: To be clear, it's not about saying one site is better or advertising a site. Simply an "oh, you can't get that here? I got my copy over there."

You don't need to read between the lines so much—it's pretty clear. Everyone is free to talk about, mention, and even compare other sites and communities here on LewdCorner, but what is NOT allowed is recruiting people to leave this community and join others.

Even in those cases, if I catch someone doing that, I’d delete the message and tell them personally, “Hey, don’t do that—it’s against the rules. It’s fine to talk about other communities, but don’t start recruiting people to leave this one.”

To be fair, to get banned here on LewdCorner, you have to be intentionally asking for it. You have to be causing a lot of trouble and not stop even when the staff tells you to, and even then, that’ll only get you a temporary ban in the thread where you’re causing trouble. Now imagine what you’d have to do and how many people you’d have to annoy to not only get banned, but also have a thread made about you.

Did they delete all of Luna’s content? Bruh

Soft-delete. We've discussed what to do about it in private.
And personally, I'm against deleting it permanently. Hate the artist, not the art.

 

[flipoff42]

You don't need to read between the lines so much—it's pretty clear. Everyone is free to talk about, mention, and even compare other sites and communities here on LewdCorner, but what is NOT allowed is recruiting people to leave this community and join others.

Even in those cases, if I catch someone doing that, I’d delete the message and tell them personally, “Hey, don’t do that—it’s against the rules. It’s fine to talk about other communities, but don’t start recruiting people to leave this one.”

To be fair, to get banned here on LewdCorner, you have to be intentionally asking for it. You have to be causing a lot of trouble and not stop even when the staff tells you to, and even then, that’ll only get you a temporary ban in the thread where you’re causing trouble. Now imagine what you’d have to do and how many people you’d have to annoy to not only get banned, but also have a thread made about you.

Thankyou for the clarification and taking the time to answer. I'm a bit new and the answers to many questions seem scattered around the forum, to the degree that if you know where to find the answer, you probably already know the answer. Anyways, I've always preferred to seek clarification preemptively rather than forgiveness after the fact.

 

[notrecommend]

Someone already explained the reason: it revolves around a paraphilia that is defended and supported there, and it’s frowned upon to be associated with people like that. I have nothing against that community, everyone is free to do whatever they want as long as they don’t harm others, but that’s just the way it is.

Personally, for me... there were two incidents involving that community that left me with a negative impression of them.


You don't need to read between the lines so much—it's pretty clear. Everyone is free to talk about, mention, and even compare other sites and communities here on LewdCorner, but what is NOT allowed is recruiting people to leave this community and join others.

Even in those cases, if I catch someone doing that, I’d delete the message and tell them personally, “Hey, don’t do that—it’s against the rules. It’s fine to talk about other communities, but don’t start recruiting people to leave this one.”

To be fair, to get banned here on LewdCorner, you have to be intentionally asking for it. You have to be causing a lot of trouble and not stop even when the staff tells you to, and even then, that’ll only get you a temporary ban in the thread where you’re causing trouble. Now imagine what you’d have to do and how many people you’d have to annoy to not only get banned, but also have a thread made about you.


Soft-delete. We've discussed what to do about it in private.
And personally, I'm against deleting it permanently. Hate the artist, not the art.

The owner will probably label me a "cuck" or some such nonsense now... but honestly, what did the user actually do that was so terrible, aside from posting advertisements and criticizing the moderation team? Does that really justify deleting all their posts, banning the user, and censoring entire websites? To me, this behavior seems excessive. And frankly, if you do delete the posts, you’ll only be hurting yourselves—especially since you’ve already censored all those websites anyway. But go ahead, delete everything! It would certainly make a certain user here—the kind who enjoys provoking others—very happy. And as we all know, you protect this particular user, doing everything you can to ensure @highlrecommend feels comfortable on your platform. How else can you explain why this user still hasn’t been banned, while @Don Tebjos received a permanent ban simply for criticizing the behavior of @Jack Of Blades?

 

[Oakbender]

I'm generally pretty critical of the way things are run here but honestly this is a pretty reasonable response to the situation.

A pattern of behaviour consistently breaking rules despite warnings and conversations. A ban like this is appropriate.