3 Years of Service
Ice but it does unlock everything,. Only scenes that have been unlocked by the player. Scenes a player didn’t manage to find are still locked.
-
LewdCorner Site Cleanup UpdateA new cleanup update has been posted covering the recent Vault rework, rank changes, policy cleanup, and theme polish. The goal is to make LC cleaner, easier to understand, and safer for the site going forward. - Jack Of BladesRead More
- Thread starter HuiEtyud
- Start date
- Replies 955
- Views 238K
3 Years of Service
This update is very good. I feel like the game just went from 0-60 in under 3 seconds. This update is going to stimulate far more interest in the game from the passive (free) players and will garner Lasto many more paid supporters as they can finally see the game is no longer a slow burn and. It has the mind if content they have been waiting for. Just my opinion.I kinda agree 80% on this one.
You have been here since the day you released your Demo for your game.
You want to make money with your game, i respect that even more. Its incredible hard making money with this kinda content nowadays.
BUT, and here it comes, you are NOT monthly updating your game for the free people. You DO update your game yourself, but....what? It takes half a year, because .... ???
I dont know what happened the past few days, or weeks. You(?) did update your game here to 1.8, but you only did that because of a leak? Meh!
You cant expect people to sit still for long when they WANT to continue your game, because its just that good, and those little sh!ts cant wait.....
Why not do public releases yourself, after your subs had their month of fun? It would be way better advertising and stuff like this wouldnt happen.
Also, on another note, Lewdcorner admins dont "leak" stuff themselfes, they just "steal" it from other sites that one of YOUR supporters posted elsewere. Its the hard truth.
Noone knows who or where your newest version got leaked....
If you rly want to stop shit like this happening, please talk to one of the responsible guys here, like Mr Tearson or to any of the other admins/uploaders.
Pretty sure you can work something out, worked for ketzal for quite some time... :S
Would hate to see another active dev of loli games leave this site
DISCLAIMER : Didnt even play your game yet. i hate "demos" and 0.2 versions....and shota isnt my cup of tea at all.....but with all the drama happening here, iam definitly trying the new leaked version......must be good or people wouldnt care
3 Years of Service
Worked for me sound like bad install
3 Years of Service
OK, I'll try it again. Tx.
3 Years of Service
Read the readme file if your stuck
3 Years of Service
That did the trick. I forgot about that. Tx.
3 Years of Service
The 8th scene is the condom scene. Follow the walkthrough to get it.
2 Years of Service
As I handled these type of situations several times before, I'll try to help and clarify some things so we can work together and prevent further misunderstandings.
For obvious reasons, I can't disclose the user's name, but this was the report we got:
You must be registered to see attachments
So here we have a user sending us a single gofile with only a PC link and saying that the game was announced on May, following that baraag link we have this:
You must be registered to see attachments
So all the info our uploaders have is that the game was released on May, and we have a file with a PC link, so they update the thread (keep in mind that here the ownership of the thread doesn't make any difference). But if the dev talk to us saying he has his own way of releasing games etc, we try to inform him first, see if everything is fine. Of course our rules say "14 days after the release", but sometimes we reach out to the dev to see if he wants to release by himself, maybe adding the extra files too (in this case Mac and Android). That's something I personally tried my best to work with ketzal on, we try to keep both parts happy (players and devs) and some people don't mind waiting some extra days to have a bug-free experience on games that they can't find on other sites.
Now why are the players unhappy about this game?
Because they were spoiled by devs that release one version to supporters and then one to the public, the free versions are usually one behind the paid one. The main problem in this thread is that the dev is using time as a metric while users are expecting versions as a metric, because a lot of devs take months and months to release an update, it's not usual to have a game this active so a lot of people are confused by how the dev works.
Now why is the dev unhappy about some comments?
Because he IS delivering solid, consistent and great content for free, monthly. Which is waaaay better than what everyone here is used to, but most comments are still saying "why are we so far behind the paid versions?" which is absolutely confusing for the dev. This all because of a simple misunderstanding about how both parts are interpreting things.
The dev sees:
- Great game without paywalling content (as far as I know, if I'm wrong my whole point is wrong, and we will have to release separated links for free and paid versions).
- Consistent updates
- Active replying to people and helping with game-related questions
The players see:
- A lot of aggressive and rude comments from the dev saying they should not play his game if they don't want to wait or pay for the supporter version in a way that he will tell you in a DM (don't ask me why, I'm just saying what I see. The dev literally asked us to remove supporter's link from the game thread)
- The free version was only 1.8 here because it was leaked somewhere (but it was updated by the dev here, this part is a bit confusing to me, but I couldn't find much more info with our team)
Players are not used to be so many versions behind, even if it's been only one month. Usually they are pretty understandable and wait months and months for an update, but will always complain if they are more than one version behind.
So the dev intended to officially release the 1.7 some time ago. Leaving the versions
1.8.1
1.9.1
1.10.1
1.11 (maybe there's a 1.11.1 too, but I don't have this information here with me)
only for paying supporters. Which can means one month in dev's eyes, but players can only think "why are we 3 or more versions behind? Are we that low priority for you?"
I could go deep and share some examples of why public versions end up giving you more paying customers as the times goes, but I don't think the dev really wants to hear and already decided his stance. I just hope both parts can understand that there's not really a problem here (if you pretend all the negative comments from both parts don't exist) and all it's just a too active dev that is not that used to how other devs work and does things in his own way.
3 Years of Service
Thanks. This ultimately helped me locate and unlock them myself since I now knew where to look! (yes I know the unlocker opens the scenes, but it is always nice to work it yourself.)
3 Years of Service
Exactly you should have a test version than a paid version after that the free version as adventurism/publicity slandered stuff
Like you said also its true the quality is there.
We will see what happens the other side of a active updated game is stress/burnout then it gets abandoned.
2 Years of Service
The 4 months was too long but I don't really see an issue with paid versions being ahead. It's not as if it was really advertised that much. I doubt a lot of people even really knew (or maybe not?)
I think it works as a nice incentive to encourage support and also makes it a bit more worth it. You get multiple updates instead of just 1.
I've played a lot of games for free and sometimes I support for the next update but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't sometimes a bit disappointed to just get the 1 additional update.
I'm not really sure why arguments about how public versions help with getting support keep getting brought up because they are releasing public versions, very consistently. Like, obviously the game being publicly available for free is good. It's good for exposure and potentially attracting more supporters. No one thinks otherwise. The author just decided to have the paid versions be significantly ahead. You can argue that it being so far ahead is maybe not the best way to do it and that it could make some people think they aren't as important - which I think is kind of a leap - but I think ultimately it doesn't matter that much. If the paid version was only 2 or 1 versions ahead, I doubt much of the 'discourse' here would be any different. I just think it's kind of a weird point that keeps getting focused on.
And my main point from before was I think that regardless of what you think or maybe what this piracy sites 'rules' are in this matter, that you probably should try and respect what the author wants when they're actively working on their game, engaging with the community, posting new releases, etc. You can disagree with some of their methods and there can be a discussion about that. But, I think it's just kind of disrespectful to go against them or ignore their wishes. It's more beneficial for everyone if creators don't get driven away because of dumb stuff like this.
But regardless, it doesn't really matter anymore. I think the decision is that the free version will only be 2 versions behind now.
There was a walk-through around somewhere for the first few days but I'm not sure where it is.
I think it works as a nice incentive to encourage support and also makes it a bit more worth it. You get multiple updates instead of just 1.
I've played a lot of games for free and sometimes I support for the next update but I'd be lying if I said I wasn't sometimes a bit disappointed to just get the 1 additional update.
I'm not really sure why arguments about how public versions help with getting support keep getting brought up because they are releasing public versions, very consistently. Like, obviously the game being publicly available for free is good. It's good for exposure and potentially attracting more supporters. No one thinks otherwise. The author just decided to have the paid versions be significantly ahead. You can argue that it being so far ahead is maybe not the best way to do it and that it could make some people think they aren't as important - which I think is kind of a leap - but I think ultimately it doesn't matter that much. If the paid version was only 2 or 1 versions ahead, I doubt much of the 'discourse' here would be any different. I just think it's kind of a weird point that keeps getting focused on.
And my main point from before was I think that regardless of what you think or maybe what this piracy sites 'rules' are in this matter, that you probably should try and respect what the author wants when they're actively working on their game, engaging with the community, posting new releases, etc. You can disagree with some of their methods and there can be a discussion about that. But, I think it's just kind of disrespectful to go against them or ignore their wishes. It's more beneficial for everyone if creators don't get driven away because of dumb stuff like this.
But regardless, it doesn't really matter anymore. I think the decision is that the free version will only be 2 versions behind now.
I think the current plan might be to just add an 'easy mode' that will just highlight the 'correct' choices. But I'm not sure when or if that will be happening.
There was a walk-through around somewhere for the first few days but I'm not sure where it is.
Last edited:
2 Years of Service
well, I was not gonna reply, but after this point I feel like the message was directed to me in a way (even without a quote), so it's only polite that I do my part, as you are a part of the dev's team and can share a different point of view from inside.
absolutely, you're right in these both points. And that's exactly what's the common feedback is saying, and using your own words, "I don't really see an issue with paid versions being ahead. But the 4 months was too long"
I'll try to keep it simple, as I think I could express this feeling in my previous post (please keep in mind that this is not my opinion, I'm just acting as the middleman here), but basically people are used to other games having one version behind even if they are months apart. Of course, if you take too long, a leak will occur when your game is popular enough. But usually with one version behind (even when months apart) people tend to respect and not leak or not download a leak. SSP is a great example of this, I handled SSP leaks several times and a lot of users just refused to download until ketzal updated the game himself, as they knew they were only one version behind and didn't care about waiting a bit more. Of course, the more popular your game gets, the more people with different opinions and expectations you're gonna reach, and you should be ready for that. This thread is a perfect example of this, and as I always say "satisfied people are usually quiet, even if they are the majority"
well, it's basically what you said. "Obviously the game being publicly available for free is good. It's good for exposure and potentially attracting more supporters". We could talk about this for hours, and still reach the simple point of exposure = money. If people have a good opinion about your game they will talk about it and support you if they can, even if you don't give them crazy rewards. People that can't support you financially but have a good opinion about your game will share that feeling with their friends, which will lead to a snowball effect of both good exposure and paying supporters. Now if your point is about "what more do you want from us?", I understand, it's the fact that users don't know how much content is there in the newer versions, they only see numbers like 1.10, 1.11 and etc. So their FOMO gets crazy thinking they are losing a ton of new content when maybe it's not even that much. Again, I still think this is all a huge misunderstanding
it's a bold strategy, but the consequences are that people will criticize that, as they are too used to how other devs do. One version ahead. If you don't mind them complaining about that, or if you play the "that's the only way I can give enough to my subs so I can keep working on these games, I need their support, I'm sorry", then you're probably gonna be fine. But confronting them about that? yeah, that's a bit more complicated, and I don't see how it can end well for both parts
that's because they are used to the other devs doing one version ahead, it became the standard, that's the only reason (and of course, the way he replied only gave them even more ground to keep pressuring). People expect all devs to follow that same pattern, the dev wants to work in his own way, and that's great, but every decision has consequences.
I understand your frustration, but please don't be passive aggressive towards us just because you don't agree with some rules or decisions. The rules were made in an effort to try to keep it fair with both devs AND users, not just one. We give devs enough time (after gathering feedback from big devs about this) to make money with their paid versions, and will only leak if some user or another site leaks that version first. We do not sub for devs to get leaks. As you can see, this thread were several versions behind, as the dev wanted, but since months ago two of our staff members always had the latest paid versions, because one is a supporter. This last version was only leaked because a user reported with a link, so we can't just ignore. Those staff members are my friends, and I know for a fact that they have all the versions up to 1.11, and they love the game. We are not trying to be your enemies, we are trying to help everyone, but above all, our community.
you're putting us in a difficult position here, we are really trying to work with y'all, but please try to see the situation from the perspective of a user or even a staff here. I created this thread on December 4 after I found the game while looking for nice games to post, I played the demo to get tags and screenshots, I would just keep updating the game as I find public releases, like we do for 95% of the games here, the dev came to LC asking for ownership of the thread. We didn't change any rule since then, so you're basically asking the entire website and their users to change its way of working to fit how you, and only you, not any other dev, wants to handle updates? I mean, we are still open and trying to reach the dev's team and see if we can talk, maybe reach some mutual agreement, but you need to take a minute to understand the issue with that.
And to be honest, we got some mixed signals from the dev, he publicly said he wouldn't release more free versions on LC anymore but still gave us the links for MAC and Android leaked versions (we only had PC), most devs just ignore that and let's find all versions if we can. So we're seeing that as a huge act of good faith from his part, and again, we are open to talk.
That's great, versions instead of months sounds way more reasonable to the community, trust me. And if you guys are still open to share public releases we see as an absolute win, the community will be really pleased with that.
2 Years of Service
I appreciate the response, I understand what you mean. Sorry if any of this came off as passive aggressive, it wasn't directed at you or anyone in particular. I was just speaking generally. Like, in general I think some of what happened wasn't handled the best and I don't know whose fault that is (on either side) but it also doesn't matter.
And just to clarify, I'm not really a dev on this game. Everything is made by Lasto. I mostly just assist him with reviewing updates and fixing some of the spelling/grammar in the game.
3 Years of Service
Since the topic has yielded... it would be best to let the dust settle and move on. It seems to me that things have returned to normal since 1.9. In my humble opinion, there's no need to make things more difficult to get the desired result right, but it's a game after all. If your work is available for free in the cloud (I think it's related to 2023), then the characters are already known. Keep playing... keep moving forward, thanks.
3 Years of Service
It there a walkthrough? where i not see u have a link?
3 Years of Service
Type "walkthrough" into the search...
https://lewdcorner.com/threads/siblings-delights-lasto-v1-9-1.14572/page-14#post-828160
3 Years of Service
But that is alot of work for many now
We need ai so the can speak to it get the wrong info but still continue in that direction till they get hurt or lost
that is today's world
Again i would love for the new gen to go into a library open a card catalog and find/read a book it could be a new tv show with drama mental strain perhaps self harm sense it would be the ultimate challenge.
3 Years of Service
i think im blind 
Similar threads
Legal Notice
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files