Have a look at the screens.There is not much loli content in this since it's not in Games+, huh?
I see, then I might give it a go. I just got used to it that any loli game that isn't in Game+ is usually just some bait a switch AV.Have a look at the screens.
Half the "cast" is "loli"
They are just barely acceptable for the other forum so they aren't in games plus here.
Arc 1 has some content, but when u get to arc 2, the content picks up much more.
Short answer=Plenty of loli content.
Arc 1 is more story focused
Arc 2 is more romance/content focused
Arc 1 is a bit more story heavy, but still has good content. Arc 2 focusses more on content, but is still advancing the plot. I didn't find Arc 1 to be that story heavy to begin with, but there is a noticeable change with Arc 2, and it is absolutely worth playing. The dev should also get praise for putting out decent sized frequent updates.Has the game reached a good point yet? As in, has any good content begun or is it still just mostly story? cba to download a game just for it to be pure/99% story
I wish there was a better solution to classification. The girls in this really should be banned for "the other forum's" official rules, but as you say they're sort of on the edge, and they really do turn a blind eye to a lot (they have a loli tag as well, how does that track?).Half the "cast" is "loli"
They are just barely acceptable for the other forum so they aren't in games plus here.
While I see where you're coming from, I would hate to be banned as a dev on the other forum. I kinda get exposure for my game that way.I wish there was a better solution to classification. The girls in this really should be banned for "the other forum's" official rules, but as you say they're sort of on the edge, and they really do turn a blind eye to a lot (they have a loli tag as well, how does that track?).
I would prefer if all this was in the games+ section, because I have little interest in mainstream H games, so I really don't want to wade through all that noise for gems like this one. I wonder how many other great games I might be missing, because that other forum doesn't enforce their own rules, which apparently dictates how we classify ours.
At the same time, I really wouldn't want anyone else to miss this one by walling it behind games+. It's not THAT hard to get access, but still...
No, I completely agree! I don't want anything banned, and it's objectively better for "questionable" stuff to slip through the cracks whenever it can. The only downside being it's harder to find for those of us (me) looking for it on purpose. It makes searching the loli tag a huge waste of time because people's ideas of what constitutes a loli varies wildly - which is how something tagged loli gets by in the first place. It's a circular problem.While I see where you're coming from, I would hate to be banned as a dev on the other forum. I kinda get exposure for my game that way.
I think the big problem is that too many people (ie: normies) conflate "loli" with "child."No, I completely agree! I don't want anything banned, and it's objectively better for "questionable" stuff to slip through the cracks whenever it can. The only downside being it's harder to find for those of us (me) looking for it on purpose. It makes searching the loli tag a huge waste of time because people's ideas of what constitutes a loli varies wildly - which is how something tagged loli gets by in the first place. It's a circular problem.
Honestly, if there was a "Hebe" tag, I would use that, instead.I think the big problem is that too many people (ie: normies) conflate "loli" with "child."
It's one of those issues where "not every loli is a child, but all children are lolis." Instead of looking for the nuance, they'd rather just knee-jerk and prevent a discussion altogether, because it always ends in a fight.
i wish there was...because i'm not interested in the traditional def of lolli'sHonestly, if there was a "Hebe" tag, I would use that, instead.
Same.i wish there was...because i'm not interested in the traditional def of lolli's
i wish there was...because i'm not interested in the traditional def of lolli's
Then it's probably good their aren't any. Hebe is the most accurate.Same.
yeah that tag is way overused, like incest also covering stepcrap and in-laws (though lately alot of AVN sites are simply removing the incest tag when it's just stepcrap, I guess all the complaining alot of people are doing is finally getting results). In this case remove loli and replace it with teen, that tag already exists and is more accurate, as I'm pretty sure no one is under 12, they all have tits.Then it's probably good their aren't any. Hebe is the most accurate.
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files