1/3
1 Year of Service
1)because they are starving rabid dogs, so if a character looks young enough, that can be good enough for many of them.Damn! Miranda's ghost is still around here.
View attachment 544363
Jokes aside, At the end the majority of players liked more the new design, but certainly due the explicit content that the OG didn't had.
View attachment 544364
In my case, I never liked any of the Miranda's designs, but I had to stick with the "most" popular design, and made improvements on it (model from v0.3), I've always liked more Fawn, but this game was the reason of my bans:
View attachment 544365
(It seems that the wokes from itch/patreon wanted a black girl, instead a redhead, so fuck them all!).
And why some guys "pretend" when the ages are very clear, also if they want "smols" as they called them, why none of them payed for that?, (I remember that, Unifans has commisions); and I don't think I've betratey anyone, the profit of "My New Daughter's Lover" barely covered three versions, and I been cover almost the full costs since then, and I'm still delivering updates to all the owners.
Also because there was a time where the common method of getting those games on sites like F## was to just claim everyone is over 18 and the script reflected that,
so they're used to having to ignore what a game claims a character's age is.
2)because most of them are jaded and were burned by too many devs who changed characters/abandoned projects/milked contributors for years with little added story/content;
so they only give money once a project has met whatever arbitrary standard they have in their head that makes them feel confident that that project will both stick around, and continue to cater to their tastes.
A lot of them won't even look at a project until it's had like 5 updates.
I do want to make it clear, I think it's on them if it was never your intention for that character to be under 18, and you had made that clear.
I'm just big on understanding why people act the way that they do.









