I would like to discuss the presence of the "rape" tag. I would like clarification - does this apply to the legislation of your countries, is it defined as sex without consent or what? It’s just that where I live, rape, from the point of view of criminal law, is sexual acts under the threat of violence (and/or objects that can be regarded as weapons). and sex without consent is not considered rape, but is simply considered other sexual acts, such as defilement. But I didn’t notice MC threatening anyone with violence. and sex in a dream can be regarded as a form of corruption. in other words, the tag “rape” is probably inappropriate here. I could of course be wrong. but this is the purpose of starting a conversation on the topic. =)
Rape is currently defined in the U.S. as basically penetration of the vagina or anus with a penis, fingers or foreign object (dildo, broom handle or anything really), or oral copulation, physically forced (i.e. held down and penetrated) or conducted under some sort of threat, express or implied, sufficient to force the victim to submit. This can include the victim controlling their own body (i.e. sucking off the rapist or riding his dick). The victim may be conscious or unconscious, restrained or free to move. If the penetrative sex is forced on them in
any way, it is rape. There must be penetration of or by a sex organ, anus or mouth (forced pussy eating is still rape as the tongue penetrates the vagina). Other non-penetrative sexual acts that happen without consent of the victim such as touching "sexual" parts of the body, making them touch the perpetrator's genitals or ass, ejaculating on them, forcing them to strip, showing them the perpetrator's dick, etc. are grouped under the rubric of "sexual assault".
A little clarification may be needed on the concept of an "implied" threat. The perpetrator must be
actively attempting to intimidate or threaten the victim. If the threat is solely
perceived by the "victim" without the perpetrator's intent then it falls into a gray area where prosecution may be difficult or inappropriate. This is why, for example, Harvey Weinstein cornering women in a room or elevator and forcing them to watch him masturbate is actionable sexual assault (not to mention the full-on rapes, both coercive and forcible, that he committed), whereas Louis C.K.
asking young comediennes if they would like to watch him masturbate, and them agreeing due to thinking that C.K. could make or break their careers, is considered creepy and beyond the pale in the #MeToo era, is not prosecutable.
It just occurred to me that our misunderstanding is due to the word itself. in Russian this word “rape” is a derivative of “violence” and therefore where there is no violence, there is no rape. This is our difference in mentality.
We have a similar word/concept in English: "violation". It did use to mean rape (like the word "viol" in French) and it can still be said that a victim of any sexual violence or non-consensual perversion (including that perpetrated by Louis C.K.) has been "violated". However, over time the general meaning has drifted into more of "breaking rules, laws or social norms". You can violate a speed limit by driving too fast, or violate the peace of a library by talking too loud, or violate social norms by going naked in a public place (which might also be considered sexual assault, especially if children are present, because the perpetrator "forced" their nudity on people who did not want to see it).
and sex in a sleep - yes, this has happened to me many times, half asleep i insert IT into wife quickly at night, cum, and then fall into sleep - a common thing.
I may not even remember this in the morning. Just see that the wife is calm and doesn’t grumble in the morning - yeah, that means something happened at night. =)
and in that case I’m a serial rapist, it turns out, haha =)
If your wife one day decides she does not like this, and objects, yes - in the U.S. she could bring rape charges against you, though she might have difficulty making it stick with a history of allowing the actions to happen, especially if she never expressed displeasure or took any means to prevent it (like telling you not to do it, or putting a pillow between you, or sleeping separately). Plus she might have to prove you were awake and not acting in a manner similar to sleepwalking. A lesser charge of sexual assault or sexual harassment would be more likely to stick. But since consent can be withdrawn at any time, she could at least make the attempt, especially if she were trying to get better terms in a divorce proceeding.