1/3
4 Years of Service
I am making this thread to ask the community to help fund a new LewdCorner server upgrade. ----> Donate Link (goal is automatic meaning it is transparent)
The goal is simple: pay about $30/month less than what we pay now, while moving to hardware that’s at least 2–3× stronger overall in real-world usage. That means more stability, faster page loads, better performance during peak traffic, and way more headroom so we’re not always riding the edge when something spikes.
Below is a clean comparison of what we have now vs what we’re wanting to upgrading to:
edit: goal reached because of @Cyrix
new server purchased, (waiting for apollo to wake up before the merge, expect downtime.)
Option A (Current) vs Option B (Upgrade)
Quick why we want Option B
The goal is simple: pay about $30/month less than what we pay now, while moving to hardware that’s at least 2–3× stronger overall in real-world usage. That means more stability, faster page loads, better performance during peak traffic, and way more headroom so we’re not always riding the edge when something spikes.
Below is a clean comparison of what we have now vs what we’re wanting to upgrading to:
edit: goal reached because of @Cyrix
new server purchased, (waiting for apollo to wake up before the merge, expect downtime.)
You must be registered to see attachments
Option A (Current) vs Option B (Upgrade)
| Category | Option A (Current) | Option B (Upgrade) | What it means (plain English) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Server / Platform | Current platform | Newer platform | Option B is a newer, stronger overall server build. |
| CPU | Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4 (14c/28t) 1.7–2.5GHz | Intel Xeon Gold 6152 (22c/44t) 2.1–3.7GHz | More cores + higher clocks = better performance under load and more users online at once without lag. |
| CPU strength | Baseline | ~1.6× to 2.2× more compute (typical server workloads) | More headroom before slowdowns when traffic spikes or background tasks run. |
| RAM | 64GB (4×16GB DDR4-2400 ECC) | 128GB (4×32GB DDR4-2666 ECC) | Exactly 2× the RAM = more caching, fewer “memory pressure” slowdowns, and smoother overall performance. |
| Storage | 1× 3.84TB SATA SSD (Intel/S4510) | 2× 3.84TB NVMe (Toshiba) (7.68TB) | NVMe is massively faster for databases + lots of files, and 2 drives also ees redundancy options. |
| Storage “feel” | Fast SSD | Server-grade fast (NVMe) | For DB + file-heavy workloads, NVMe can feel 3×–10×+ snappier than SATA (depending on what’s happening). |
| Drive failure risk | Higher (single drive) | Lower (dual drive → RAID1 option) | Option B can be configured to survive a drive failure without taking LC down. (like it just did) |
Quick why we want Option B
- More CPU power: 14c/28t → 22c/44t plus higher clocks (more users, less lag).
- 2× RAM: 64GB → 128GB (bigger cache, smoother performance, fewer slowdowns).
- Dual NVMe drives: way faster DB/files + redundancy option (RAID1).
- Guaranteed 300M unmetered: consistent throughput for the community at peak times.
- Cheaper monthly: about ~$30 less than the current server while being significantly stronger.
Attachments
You must be registered for see attachments list
Last edited:
