discussion Thoughts on content that isn't lolisho being tagged as such

[Cunny Lord]

It's kinda increasing lately. Here and elsewhere. You can't even use the "she's just short" excuse because they've begun applying it to pretty lanky girls, close to or above the 160 mark.

Like, damn, do tallflats just... not exist for some people?

 

[highlrecommend]

anything being tagged as something that it's not should be fixed or removed.

#Rabbit

 

[LadyCeleste]

Doesn't loli have different (maybe slightly different) definitions depending on where you are (Japan or the West)?

 

[bricome]

i think some people would rather be safe than sorry, so they add that tag if theres anything remotely close

 

[Redyscom]

Something that is advertised as something it is not is literally the definition of a scam. It's like tagging stepcest as incest.

If doesn't meet the main requirement for being lolis and/or shotas, then it's flat-chested, petite, young-looking, or whatever you want to call it.

 

[Cunny Lord]

It's like tagging stepcest as incest.

You'd be surprised how many in the modern era (especially on Xitter) treat it as such, seething at the sight.

 

[FiddleFaun]

The game developers should fix that. Organization is key to follow the rules.

It also helps people people identify the contents of the game.

 

[Ban_bestboi]

I mean, even the definition of the word "loli" is kinda subjective so its kinda inevitable to have some deviations with the tags