2 Months of Service
When it comes to artwork wich ones do you prefer? a realistic artstyle or one with less rigid constraints?
Personaly when i see realistic artwork they often come across as ugly due to uncanny valley, it feels as if the author is sacrificing atractiveness for the sake of realism. It is even worse when it comes to 3D as the loss of details and increased blandness of the models makes them very unappealing meanwhile stylized art often have the advantage of being able to emphasize some traits to make the character more appealing to the brain even though the end result is less "human-like". But still when it comes to certain niches the realistic style is often more present, what other advantages do you think this style has besides it's namesake?
Personaly when i see realistic artwork they often come across as ugly due to uncanny valley, it feels as if the author is sacrificing atractiveness for the sake of realism. It is even worse when it comes to 3D as the loss of details and increased blandness of the models makes them very unappealing meanwhile stylized art often have the advantage of being able to emphasize some traits to make the character more appealing to the brain even though the end result is less "human-like". But still when it comes to certain niches the realistic style is often more present, what other advantages do you think this style has besides it's namesake?