This man speaks the truth!Definitely underboob. It's rarer, the owner is more confident in their perkiness (or more exhibitionist), and catching a nip slip feels like catching a full boob in the wild. Sideboob is second place for it's relative rarity compared to cleavage, not there's anything wrong with cleavage.
I agree 100% underboob on top foreverThat was the question I woke up thinking about the other day and the following were my pros and cons on the matter:
- Cleavage is the most commonly observed of the three - in the public domain. However; padding, push-up devices and smooshing together can lead to misleading presentations of shape and size.
- With sideboobs and underboobs you can be more confident that what you see is what you get.
- Sideboobs lend themselves to more covert observation.
- The underboobs look requires a certain level of perkiness which usually commends itself to the beholder.
- With underboobs there is a greater chance for slippage and revelation to occur.
For me the answer is clear: Underboobs win.
What do you think?
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files