1/3
10 Months of Service
have you ever thought about making a porn game of some sort, if so what has stopped you? also if you have, did you ever have a concept of it in your head?
Jup, but ain't got the type or capability to do it.. sadlyhave you ever thought about making a porn game of some sort, if so what has stopped you? also if you have, did you ever have a concept of it in your head?
After a few scenarios I thought about, I kinda started to get some people's opinion about their own works. Even if it's not really great story - it's yours, with your thoughts and philosophy behind it (As long as you really thought it through, that isNo. For a simple reason — I’m a reader, not a writer. The internet is already overflowing with mediocre fanfics; why contribute to the growth of entropy?
II’ve been fascinated by science fiction since my youth, and I’m still fascinated by it. Let’s take the period from 1938 to 1950 — the so‑called “golden age of science fiction”. From a purely literary perspective, 90–95 percent of the works published at that time are junk, typical pulp fiction. The exceptions are very few — John Campbell’s novellas, some short stories and novellas by Robert Heinlein, and stories by Henry Kuttner. Very few stories by Isaac Asimov. How many authors of the “golden age” grew into mature writers? Very few. Heinlein, for example (although he also had some failures), Campbell stopped writing, Kuttner died very young, and Asimov successfully published pulp until the end of his days. If we look at a later period, the only examples that come to mind are Robert Silverberg, who started out as a very weak prose writer but suddenly began to create quite good works in the 1960s, and Stanisław Lem, who, after his first two very weak novels, began to produce true masterpieces. Some (Ray Bradbury, Ursula Le Guin, Roger Zelazny, and a few others) were initially endowed with a creative gift, but these are isolated examples. So, alas, in the field of literature, quantity does not always translate into quality. And since we’re talking about visual NOVELS, that means we’re also talking about literature.After a few scenarios I thought about, I kinda started to get some people's opinion about their own works. Even if it's not really great story - it's yours, with your thoughts and philosophy behind it (As long as you really thought it through, that is). And sometimes, I think, you need to create a few mediocrities to work on skills - it's not like everyone is a genius, who could produce masterpiece as their first work, right?
I look a bit different on this situation - quantity gives you the opportunity to learn on mistakes of others, so it could translate into quality of future authors (It doesn't mean, that everyone will learn on them. But a few will). Who knows, what kind of works could we have if such golden age had not happened? Maybe we would praise some "meh" story just because it would be the best at that point? And some writers you mentioned still had their own weak works - everyone needs to start from somewhere.II’ve been fascinated by science fiction since my youth, and I’m still fascinated by it. Let’s take the period from 1938 to 1950 — the so‑called “golden age of science fiction”. From a purely literary perspective, 90–95 percent of the works published at that time are junk, typical pulp fiction. The exceptions are very few — John Campbell’s novellas, some short stories and novellas by Robert Heinlein, and stories by Henry Kuttner. Very few stories by Isaac Asimov. How many authors of the “golden age” grew into mature writers? Very few. Heinlein, for example (although he also had some failures), Campbell stopped writing, Kuttner died very young, and Asimov successfully published pulp until the end of his days. If we look at a later period, the only examples that come to mind are Robert Silverberg, who started out as a very weak prose writer but suddenly began to create quite good works in the 1960s, and Stanisław Lem, who, after his first two very weak novels, began to produce true masterpieces. Some (Ray Bradbury, Ursula Le Guin, Roger Zelazny, and a few others) were initially endowed with a creative gift, but these are isolated examples. So, alas, in the field of literature, quantity does not always translate into quality. And since we’re talking about visual NOVELS, that means we’re also talking about literature.
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files