discussion HTML AI Family Business [v0.40 Public] [FamilyDev]

[SilentHunter]

Who is the real-life counterpart of this girl?

It's arina(irina)_gp, OnlyFans model from Russia.

 

[VForValhalla]

It's arina(irina)_gp, OnlyFans model from Russia.

The same girl with the circle tattoo on her upper abdomen?

 

[SilentHunter]

The same girl with the circle tattoo on her upper abdomen?

The developer uses deep fake technology, anything can happen there. I am not subscribed to any model in such services, but she has a selection of pictures, one of which you presented. I'm not interested in tattoos, piercings, etc. nonsense, sorry. Regarding the methods of using AI in working on the game, it is better to contact the developer - he is quite available on a well-known site, the mentioning of which is, if not prohibited here, then not welcome.

 

[cuntsly]

Amy - Aqua Ri (active in 2020-24, in 2024 for unknown reasons deleted all her channels, clips are still available on torrents).

Veronica - Kristina Sweet/LuxuryGirl aka LuxuryGirl_XXX (true name: Polina Marchenko, born in Leningrad, active in 2018-24).

Both are from Russia

yeah, no, neither of those models look like what's in the banner.

HEre is the Banner with the two girls...



And here is a pic of Emma Watson and Larkin Love.



Idk how you got Kristina Sweet and Aqua RI. Megan Fox also works for the girl on the right. But it's definitely an AI rendering of Emma Watson, and LarkinLove. I say Larkin Love, cuz Megan Fox has never had that hairstyle.

 

[SilentHunter]

yeah, no, neither of those models look like what's in the banner.

HEre is the Banner with the two girls...

View attachment 716007

And here is a pic of Emma Watson and Larkin Love.

View attachment 716008View attachment 716009

Idk how you got Kristina Sweet and Aqua RI. Megan Fox also works for the girl on the right. But it's definitely an AI rendering of Emma Watson, and LarkinLove. I say Larkin Love, cuz Megan Fox has never had that hairstyle.

I am giving the information I received from the developer. All media files have been processed by AI. And why couldn't Monica Bellucci have been taken as the original sample? To this day, most people on the neighboring site are sure that this is it.
Take a close look at the Aqua Ri videos. You can find the videos used in the game. As for Kristina Sweet/LuxuryGirl aka LuxuryGirl_XXX, she was a very active lady, and I don't want to download half a terabyte of videos for her. I just don't like her, to be honest.

 

[cuntsly]

I am giving the information I received from the developer. All media files have been processed by AI. And why couldn't Monica Bellucci have been taken as the original sample? To this day, most people on the neighboring site are sure that this is it.
Take a close look at the Aqua Ri videos. You can find the videos used in the game. As for Kristina Sweet/LuxuryGirl aka LuxuryGirl_XXX, she was a very active lady, and I don't want to download half a terabyte of videos for her. I just don't like her, to be honest.

so, the characters in the game look nothing like what's in the banner or other preview images? I'm not downloading the game mostly cuz the AI stuff looks shoddy, incomplete, and weird.
so if the banner is misrepresenting the game, why would I play it?
If i wanna play a game where I get to see Megan Fox and/or Emma Watson naked, even as AI, I'd excuse it, but for that reason only.
Dev needs to clear the field a bit. ya can't use celebrity likeness to draw people in, then pull a bait and switch, and expect them to subscribe for it.

 

[SilentHunter]

so, the characters in the game look nothing like what's in the banner or other preview images? I'm not downloading the game mostly cuz the AI stuff looks shoddy, incomplete, and weird.
so if the banner is misrepresenting the game, why would I play it?
If i wanna play a game where I get to see Megan Fox and/or Emma Watson naked, even as AI, I'd excuse it, but for that reason only.
Dev needs to clear the field a bit. ya can't use celebrity likeness to draw people in, then pull a bait and switch, and expect them to subscribe for it.

Whether you like it or not, AI will dominate this niche in a couple of years. What about celebrities? I like Monica Bellucci, but not Emma Watson... Scary as an atomic war and an untalented actress. She will never be a bait for me. Everyone has their own tastes.

 

[cuntsly]

Whether you like it or not, AI will dominate this niche in a couple of years. What about celebrities? I like Monica Bellucci, but not Emma Watson... Scary as an atomic war and an untalented actress. She will never be a bait for me. Everyone has their own tastes.

if you think AI is gonna dominate this niche in a couple years, you're stupid. MAYBE with celebrity deepfakes, since that's always been too big for them to control, but it will never write the stories or crate 3D models that people enjoy the same way artists do. mostly because people still dont know how to use AI properly even the artists who use AI to augment or speed up their own artistic process, the artist still sets the foundation and does most of the work.

I'm saying, I'd actually come in for the celebrities. but if a game is gonna say "Look, we have this specific celebrity A!" and then when I actually open the game, they have 30 different CG's of different people, clearly not the specific celebrity, I'll just assume the dev doesn't know what they are doing. If I am looking for something specific, don't offer that specific thing, then turn and say "oh, I lied, we don't actually have that. here is an alternative though!" all you're doing is taking advantage of my interest in something specific to shill your own shit, so you can go fuck yourself. get outta here with that manipulative salesman bullshit.

Either the dev is using a specific person in their scenes, or not. and since apparently there is no consistency between the preview images, and the actual game, I'm not interested.

 

[SilentHunter]

if you think AI is gonna dominate this niche in a couple years, you're stupid. MAYBE with celebrity deepfakes, since that's always been too big for them to control, but it will never write the stories or crate 3D models that people enjoy the same way artists do. mostly because people still dont know how to use AI properly even the artists who use AI to augment or speed up their own artistic process, the artist still sets the foundation and does most of the work.

I'm saying, I'd actually come in for the celebrities. but if a game is gonna say "Look, we have this specific celebrity A!" and then when I actually open the game, they have 30 different CG's of different people, clearly not the specific celebrity, I'll just assume the dev doesn't know what they are doing. If I am looking for something specific, don't offer that specific thing, then turn and say "oh, I lied, we don't actually have that. here is an alternative though!" all you're doing is taking advantage of my interest in something specific to shill your own shit, so you can go fuck yourself. get outta here with that manipulative salesman bullshit.

Either the dev is using a specific person in their scenes, or not. and since apparently there is no consistency between the preview images, and the actual game, I'm not interested.

That's your business. No one forces you to play this game under threat of being shot.

 

[cuntsly]

That's your business. No one forces you to play this game under threat of being shot.

so, you don't think the title, banner, and images posted in this thread are misleading at all?
Interesting.

 

[SilentHunter]

so, you don't think the title, banner, and images posted in this thread are misleading at all?
Interesting.

When I buy a book, the last thing I pay attention to is the picture on the cover. I am guided by the author's name and a brief announcement in the book itself. In the case of these very games, I am guided by the reviews on the site, which cannot be mentioned here. If I decide to support a developer with my own money, it means that I am sincerely interested in his work. The main thing is to have good gameplay. All other considerations (including the use of AI) are irrelevant to me.

 

[SilentHunter]

Hello everyone
I'm sharing what I'm planning for the next update.
This update will mainly focus on Veronica's storyline. Her arch will be developed with new content, as well as the dependency system will be improved — both in terms of mechanics and in terms of her personal progress.
Amy will also get some attention — there will be new moments and additions to her content.
In parallel, I will continue to work on the gallery. Since no new errors have been found, I will continue to polish it and add scenes to make everything work as smoothly as possible.

You must be registered to see links

 

[SilentHunter]

v.0.39 changelog

· Added 2 new main story quests
· All the transition scenes to the second chapter are now available in the Gallery
· A new intimate scene with Veronica, which opens with a high level of addiction
· Integrated mechanics of creating fruit mixes have been introduced, which is available at a high level of dependence
· The addiction system has been completely redesigned — now it directly affects the gameplay
· A complete rebalance of all actions affecting Veronica's Desire and Amy's Jealousy
· Added a new daytime scene with Veronica
· Added an exclusive Busty scene (Free Use) with Veronica
· A fresh batch of avatars, backgrounds and interface icons· Bug fixes and grammatical edits have also been made.

You must be registered to see links

 

[rifticc]

love to seeing it being updated. good work

 

[Bukoden]

When I buy a book, the last thing I pay attention to is the picture on the cover. I am guided by the author's name and a brief announcement in the book itself. In the case of these very games, I am guided by the reviews on the site, which cannot be mentioned here. If I decide to support a developer with my own money, it means that I am sincerely interested in his work. The main thing is to have good gameplay. All other considerations (including the use of AI) are irrelevant to me.

Well, this isn't just a book, it explicitly has images as a part of its appeal. If you want to see a movie, you absolutely go by what is advertised (posters, trailers, case art, etc.) for who you expect to see in it. If what's in those is explicitly different than what's in the movie, then it's a valid complaint for someone to make, even if another person doesn't care about it. Your book analogy would be better if the story info blurb on the back/inside cover (I'm assuming this is the same thing you mean by brief announcement) mentioned events and characters that don't exist in the book. Depicting something that doesn't exist, visually : Describing something that doesn't exist, textually.

If it shows as having something that it doesn't, that is a lie. People commenting on the lie is exactly the sort of thing you mention being guided by, which is the reviews. The banner is intended to be what first draws someone to the game, so it being not relevant to what is actually in the game very much matters to others, even if not to you, personally. "What is shown when you are first presented with this game is not in it" is a review, even if it comes by way of asking to confirm that fact, followed by taking issue when it appears to be confirmed. It doesn't require a gun to the head forcing them to play it for it to be relevant and reasonable to be commented on in the literal COMMENT section for the game.

 

[SilentHunter]

Well, this isn't just a book, it explicitly has images as a part of its appeal. If you want to see a movie, you absolutely go by what is advertised (posters, trailers, case art, etc.) for who you expect to see in it. If what's in those is explicitly different than what's in the movie, then it's a valid complaint for someone to make, even if another person doesn't care about it. Your book analogy would be better if the story info blurb on the back/inside cover (I'm assuming this is the same thing you mean by brief announcement) mentioned events and characters that don't exist in the book. Depicting something that doesn't exist, visually : Describing something that doesn't exist, textually.

If it shows as having something that it doesn't, that is a lie. People commenting on the lie is exactly the sort of thing you mention being guided by, which is the reviews. The banner is intended to be what first draws someone to the game, so it being not relevant to what is actually in the game very much matters to others, even if not to you, personally. "What is shown when you are first presented with this game is not in it" is a review, even if it comes by way of asking to confirm that fact, followed by taking issue when it appears to be confirmed. It doesn't require a gun to the head forcing them to play it for it to be relevant and reasonable to be commented on in the literal COMMENT section for the game.

An example of a very weak book with a bright, flashy cover. I understand that this is not the fault of the writer, but of the publishers (although I suppose. that the author was familiar with the layout of the book and approved it). There are tens of thousands of such examples in the field of SF and Fantasy, just go to any bookstore. And yes, this is a deception of the reader, since the image on the cover has nothing to do with the content of the novel. But as a marketing ploy, it works. As for this game, I hesitated to approach it for a long time, because I extremely dislike Emma Watson both as an actress and as a woman. But then, after reading reviews and conversations with the author (on other sites) I finally stepped over myself.

 

[SilentHunter]

Next update (0.40) will mainly focus on Evelyn's storyline. Her story will continue to evolve with new quests and scenes that better reveal her character and the conflicts around her. I want to push her story further.
In addition, I will add several side quests to give more opportunities to interact with different characters.
The gallery will also continue to expand — I will add new scenes so that you can review your favorite moments at any time.
There will also be a couple of new scenes for Veronica, and her addiction system will be further developed and will begin to show a more noticeable progression.

You must be registered to see links

 

[Bukoden]

An example of a very weak book with a bright, flashy cover. I understand that this is not the fault of the writer, but of the publishers (although I suppose. that the author was familiar with the layout of the book and approved it). There are tens of thousands of such examples in the field of SF and Fantasy, just go to any bookstore. And yes, this is a deception of the reader, since the image on the cover has nothing to do with the content of the novel. But as a marketing ploy, it works. As for this game, I hesitated to approach it for a long time, because I extremely dislike Emma Watson both as an actress and as a woman. But then, after reading reviews and conversations with the author (on other sites) I finally stepped over myself.
View attachment 735005

None of that really goes against what I said, nor does "things like this are sometimes done elsewhere" make the criticism of it invalid or unreasonable.

Overall, it sounds like you might agree that it probably shouldn't be done, and that it would be better if it wasn't. You would have been able to make an accurate judgement call on if it was for you or not based on what was presented as if it was in the game (something you explicitly said you don't do: "the last thing I pay attention to is the picture on the cover." Yet you just admitted that you do: "I hesitated to approach it for a long time..."). As a matter of fact, if it wasn't complained about in the first place, you never would have learned that it was such and decided to try the game (why would it be discussed in reviews if not mentioning it not existing in the game or discussed by the author if it wasn't complained/asked about?).

You have effectively agreed with what I said, at this point. I'm not sure if you thought my disagreement with you was over whether it happens elsewhere, but it wasn't. I agree that it is a thing that's done, but that it is reasonable to complain about, and that your analogy wasn't a great one. A snapshot of a potential scene/imagination of a scene in a book is not the same as a depiction of characters that would visibly exist in a visual media. The visual display of characters in a visual media is closer to the written description of contents for a written media (synopsis on the inside sleeve/back cover of a book). Not all books have cover art, but if they have a written synopsis of what the written story is about, you would likely complain or understand complaints if it was a lie. This game based around the visual and written display of the story has visual examples of what to expect for that part of it, and that's the same thing. There is a complaint because the visual part of the "synopsis" is a lie. It doesn't matter how good the story is or if you or anyone else enjoys it. That is irrelevant to the complaint, which sounds to be accurate and, therefore, valid to make.

I'm not even sure what you are trying to argue against, at this point, when you say it also fooled you and that was a bad thing. Complaining about a lie in regards to the game is reasonable in the comment section for the game, and is a form of review that lets other know what to expect. Someone leaves a bad review for something with comments on the negatives is making a complaint. That is what has happened here that you seem to be calling out as unreasonable.

 

[SilentHunter]

v. 0.40
Changes:
· Added 4 new story quests
· Added 2 new daily scenes
· Added 2 new scenes expanding the Addiction system
· New Boosty-exclusive scene with Amy
· Redesigned Boosty scenes: Teacher, Outside and Kobeni (significant improvements)
· Added new character avatars and backgrounds
· Multiple bug fixes, improved text and grammar throughout the game
. P.S. Sorry, I didn't have time to add the scenes of the first chapter to the gallery. This will be done in the next update.

The public version 0.39 will be released in a few hours today.

 

[b.e.thd.ele.on]

Thanks