discussion Mother Taboo Discussion

[StarFucked]

Does is weird if people have sex with their mothers?
I believe this is a fascinating debatable topic on what society thinks is the best...

Without a doubt there's a majority who likes incest games specially with mothers....
In your opinion why are we attracted to Family Sex (incest) games so much? (Discussion point)

Select all the choices U agree on the poll.
This is a nonjudgmental zone.





MOD EDIT: if you going to upload that many images please use thumbnails - Shawn

You must be registered to see attachments

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[Uthuriel]

IRL?
Absolutely not.

In fiction?
I see no problem there.

 

[ErzuzB]

Taboo ≠ Illegality
Should it be a taboo? Yes, this is nothing that should be normalized.
Should it be illegal? Yes, but mostly because it's better that way. Anyone can claim that something like this is consensual and mutual, but the mere fact that it involves family power dynamics makes it questionable.

If it would be about siblings...
Taboo, yes.
Illegal... Siblings are usual close enought in age and development to be on the same level and if it's consensual and mutual... why not, let them as long as they don't make babies.

 

[USER_6969]

So should pixels be used to portray virtual incest? Personally I don't care, but then I am not a payment processor.

 

[zigster123]

Mothers are women, so they're fuckable (if they want).

 

[StarFucked]

IRL?
Absolutely not.

In fiction?
I see no problem there.

In your opinion..., why do U think people draw a line there....?
U can vote as well

 

[StarFucked]

Taboo ≠ Illegality
Should it be a taboo? Yes, this is nothing that should be normalized.
Should it be illegal? Yes, but mostly because it's better that way. Anyone can claim that something like this is consensual and mutual, but the mere fact that it involves family power dynamics makes it questionable.

If it would be about siblings...
Taboo, yes.
Illegal... Siblings are usual close enought in age and development to be on the same level and if it's consensual and mutual... why not, let them as long as they don't make babies.

I get your first point and totally agree with your last point.... No babies...

 

[StarFucked]

Mothers are women, so they're fuckable (if they want).

Amen

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[GettinOlder]

It was normal behavior centuries ago, and yes, I know that certain royalty did it a lot to keep bloodlines pure, but upon the introduction of religion, it was then considered immoral. Religion was created as a means to control civilization. There is no basis or empirical evidence of a "higher" power existing and if there are no genetic issues within a family, which there is ALWAYS
some sort of genetic issue because no one is unflawed, then what two people do in the privacy of their own domicile, they should be allowed to do.
Same thing as if a brother and sister decided to live together and raise a family. It's their business.

That's just my opinion and not those of the station or the management.

 

[StarFucked]

It was normal behavior centuries ago, and yes, I know that certain royalty did it a lot to keep bloodlines pure, but upon the introduction of religion, it was then considered immoral. Religion was created as a means to control civilization. There is no basis or empirical evidence of a "higher" power existing and if there are no genetic issues within a family, which there is ALWAYS
some sort of genetic issue because no one is unflawed, then what two people do in the privacy of their own domicile, they should be allowed to do.
Same thing as if a brother and sister decided to live together and raise a family. It's their business.

That's just my opinion and not those of the station or the management.

I mean..., there's definite genetic consequences if blood relatives have a baby (at least a high chance of it)..., but imo that shouldn't stop mutual sexual interactions between family if they want as long as they don't procreate.

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[AlBetGam]

Illegal... Siblings are usual close enought in age and development to be on the same level and if it's consensual and mutual... why not, let them as long as they don't make babies.

I'm skeptical even there. A 3-4 year age gap between siblings, for instance, isn't big, but it's enough that the older one is definitely going to be "in charge" and I'd seriously question whether the younger one was actually a willing partner or was coerced into it. Especially if they're young, but honesty even if they're adults in some cases.

It was normal behavior centuries ago, and yes, I know that certain royalty did it a lot to keep bloodlines pure, but upon the introduction of religion, it was then considered immoral. Religion was created as a means to control civilization. There is no basis or empirical evidence of a "higher" power existing and if there are no genetic issues within a family, which there is ALWAYS
some sort of genetic issue because no one is unflawed, then what two people do in the privacy of their own domicile, they should be allowed to do.
Same thing as if a brother and sister decided to live together and raise a family. It's their business.

That's just my opinion and not those of the station or the management.

I'm pretty sure parent-child incest has not been considered "normal behavior" at any time. Royalty was certainly not doing it to keep the bloodlines pure in most places (exceptions noted, but most royal incest was more like uncle-niece or cousin-cousin, and it was usually to keep lands and power within the family).

And religion in humanity is so old I don't think we can even point to an "introduction" of it. Unless you're speaking of specific religions, like Christianity, in which case incest taboos are definitely way way older than that.

 

[Shawnchapp]

Just remember be careful how you answer and reply to others here.

NO KINK SHAMMING ​

 

[ErzuzB]

I'm skeptical even there. A 3-4 year age gap between siblings, for instance, isn't big, but it's enough that the older one is definitely going to be "in charge" and I'd seriously question whether the younger one was actually a willing partner or was coerced into it. Especially if they're young, but honesty even if they're adults in some cases.

That's why I wrote 'usual'.
Also the same would be for any other same age relationship anyway.
And obviously the other rules, like minors and stuff, would still apply.

NO KINK SHAMMING

Dunno if that is fitting if it's not about a kink, but real world circumstances.

 

[StarFucked]

I'm skeptical even there. A 3-4 year age gap between siblings, for instance, isn't big, but it's enough that the older one is definitely going to be "in charge" and I'd seriously question whether the younger one was actually a willing partner or was coerced into it. Especially if they're young, but honesty even if they're adults in some cases.

I'm pretty sure parent-child incest has not been considered "normal behavior" at any time. Royalty was certainly not doing it to keep the bloodlines pure in most places (exceptions noted, but most royal incest was more like uncle-niece or cousin-cousin, and it was usually to keep lands and power within the family).

And religion in humanity is so old I don't think we can even point to an "introduction" of it. Unless you're speaking of specific religions, like Christianity, in which case incest taboos are definitely way way older than that.

There's definitely more mythology related to incest specially in Ancient Greece... But even then it's considered taboo... Even in other cultures like Egyptian or Peru where royalty fuck with family to keep royalty in the same family, do have some mentions it been a taboo for common fork... But there are some (very few) ancient civilizations it was considered a norm....

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[skored]

IRL, definitely not.
But in games? Totally fine.

You must be registered to see attachments

 

[StarFucked]

IRL, definitely not.
But in games? Totally fine.

You must be registered to see attachments

Why do you think people draw that line?
Is it because of morals or motherhood being sacred kinda or something else?

 

[Shawnchapp]

Dunno if that is fitting if it's not about a kink, but real world circumstances.

i mean wanting to fuck your mother IRL is a kink it certainly as hell not "normal" Lol

 

[Freyr]

The taboo is definitely the reason why incest is hot.

If it were not a taboo, would it still be hot?
I think that's a good question and difficult to answer.

In my personal opinion, a woman in her 20's is generally speaking more attractive than a woman in her 40's.
On the other hand, a difference in age and experience can also be hot. For example, teacher-student relations, which are also taboo but less so than incest.
Power dynamics is definitely a thing, but that can also be hot.

I think there are different factors which are not necessarily directly linked to each other, but which do have some relation to each other.

Taboo is not the same as illegality, but it's similar.
Morality is not the same as legality, but it's similar.
Power dynamics is not the same as abuse, but it's similar.
Sex is not the same as procreation, but it's similar.
Etc.

I can see these things as a kind of scale, on which some areas are maybe not socially acceptable but still hot, where other areas can be quite repulsive.

And then there is, in real life, also the balance between acting on impulse vs. doing things which are a good idea in the long run.

On the other hand, if you imagine a society where any kind of sex with anyone would be freely available to everybody, would that be desirable to you?
Is, in such a society, sex still meaningful at all? Or is it like wanking off with another person's body?
In such a society, would there be a difference between fucking your own mother or some other random MILF whose name you don't even know?

Just some fairly random thoughts....

 

[Shawnchapp]

Personally for me i have no interest in my family members, im sure they look good they just don't see them as sexually attractive i do believe some of people incest comes from some people not able to tell the different between a family bond love (unconditional love. also love thats just there from birth) verus a nature love the blossoms and grows between strangers. one is just there since birth the other one as to work for.

then agian i don't have a younger sister maybe thats the key element i'm missing to fully understand it all LOL

as for people doing it i don't care what anyone does behind closed doors.

 

[Captain Panda]

i would compare it to maybe a apocalypse fantasy like the walking dead or fallout. im sure we all have thought about what we would do in zombie/nuclear apocalypse. a fun fantasy to think about from the outside, but put in the actual situation we would act very differently. In the same way the people in it aren't you but its fun to think about it when there are no stakes, just like in games and shows but would be different if it was actually you.

this is my uneducated opinion.