1/3
2 Years of Service
Beta was superior and was replaced by VHS through their marketing expertise, multi-media production houses continued using beta for at least a decade after the battle was lost because of it's superiority.. Those big platters were called LaserDiscs Although the format was capable of offering higher-quality video and audio than its consumer rivals, VHS and Betamax videotape, LaserDisc never managed to gain widespread use in North America. This was largely due to the high cost of the players and their inability to record TV programs. Initially the players cost about 750 dollars -- i bought one at a garage sale for 40 bucks about 15 years ago - it still worked but I only had 2 movies to play on it.I recall reading some years ago that Beta was actually the superior technology, better fidelity, etc., but that VHS had better PR and more financial backing, or something to that effect. Basically, VHS was able to buy its way into the superior position and stayed there, until eventually being replaced by DVD. Speaking of, do you remember those big ass platters the preceded DVD? About the size of a 33rpm record? Can't remember what they were called and don't feel like searching right now. They were supposed to be a better tech at their time as well, but didn't make it for similar reasons. They remind me of the platters that were put on the Voyagers with info about Earth - may have been the same basic tech, but the platter wasn't made entirely of gold.
You must be registered to see attachments
Attachments
You must be registered for see attachments list