You must be registered to see links
as per link thingy, nizupacokyu is an independent artist which has chosen the method of invite only paywall to access of their content. Aside from pirating which involves on relying on others to purchase the content then share it through torrents, the only way to obtain the content is to subscribe/purchase it by subscriber means listed on their linktree.
So, looooong story short, since about 2014, indie artists within industry have gone route of coin-op metering their content to followers/subscribers throufh several platforms. Some platforms such as DL Site, have taken means to prevent against piracy through DRM solutions.
While also independents operating in this way, have been able to rely on the fact of their own obscurity.Whether new to industry or too niche, fact is most wont file share works via torrent as there is not enough of a fanbase for it. That coupled from phenomenon of "data hoarding/treasuring". For those who subscribe as a serious otaku-ism, the fact that they paid for the media makes it treasured/special to them in one form or another. Due to such, the most typical simps will refuse to pirate distro the paycontent out of entitlement and principle.
This isn't to say pirate torrents or copies don't or won't exist, just that due to this phenomena, until a mass scale followimg is established to enough of an extent, it is highly unlikely that pirate copies would be made.
I tried hinting at this concept in my reply to Escape's req for Rainbowbrite's content but it appears I may have to be abit more blunt in this fashion.
Upside, if the content is prolific enough, pirated torrents are eventually sure to crop up. Until then, if you want content from artists such as this whom have chosen this distro method, someone will first have to buy that content, to then fileshare it through the internet. There are non-direct approach methods to this and many but in the end someone must buy it with intent to share it. Whicg oddly enough will happen naturally eventually, but if you wish to expidite that process, some pro-activity must be taken.
The real question is, going forward how do we as independent producers of media choose to share our works? Do we take this multi-platform coin-op tactic of monthly subscription +/- pay per view/pay per content access, to distribute our artwork at all? Or instead, do we host a "buy me a coffee" donation blog while issuing our content for free. In the latter, relying on the generosity of our communuty and followers for support in developing our media? How can both models be improved? What might we do to better facilitate both ethically and effectively our own suport to deliver content while at same time getting what we feel as developers is appropriate value for the compensation of our works?
These are questions we must solve as for the moment, well, the endless outcry for pirating paywall content such as this, yet the fact that such outcries come from the urge of not being the "direct pirating party" shows how curious our ethics can be in this. While at sametime, the sheer ineffectiveness of noobs to industry failing to obtain any crowd sourcing...
Better methods and solutions to these questions for both routes must soon exist.
Apologies on the TLDR but this sort of thing in the inefficiency of both routes has existed for almost 10 years now, with no serious effort to address these questions or challenge that status quo. Hence the blunt TLDR.
Thanks for your time, hope you find the art you are looking for, but with niche of this artist and how new they are, torrents of their content aren't that likely yet.
