Is it gay to fuck your homie in the ass but you didnt come and your socks were still on?
- Thread starter jonrexx
- Start date
- Replies 33
- Views 202
9 Days of Service
Wait... What colour were the socks? Super important information that you left out.
26 Days of Service
Well, he never said whether his homie is male, identifies as male, or is even human...If his homie is female or identifies as female, then officially, it’s not gay.
26 Days of Service
That's right, I think the favorite color of gay men is pink, so if the socks were black, that wouldn't be gay anymore, since black signifies heterosexuality.
9 Days of Service
True. Unless, of course, they were so confident in their heterosexuality that they were wearing pink socks ironically to show just how not gay they were.
26 Days of Service
Yeah, true, we don't know that; plus, it depends on whether he just fucked his homie in the ass once or multiple times. A psychologist once said that if something like that happens just once, it's normal, just part of trying things out and experimenting, and has nothing to do with one's sexuality.
9 Days of Service
"Fuck me once, shame on you. Fuck me twice, shame on me."
4 Years of Service
Still gay
BUT only if you don't know because you see them as feminine
9 Days of Service
If you think Nicole Maines is a man, then you've lost your mind.
1 Year of Service
Y'all really asking if its gay to do gay stuff... It's 2026. It's okay to be gay (depending on where you live).
6 Days of Service
It's the epitome of straightness, obviously.
4 Years of Service
VERY VERYYY gay
4 Years of Service
If i saw her I'll never think she's a man that's why I said if you don't know
26 Days of Service
According to my current studies, research, and interviews with experts it's like this: According to the "bro code," keeping your socks on negates any homosexual implications during intimate acts between men. And precisely because he's your homie, according to the bro code, he's not gay. sexual orientation is defined by genuine attraction and identity, So that means if he just wanted to fuck him but doesn't feel attracted to him or doesn't see him as a man, then according to "2026" it's not gay...and btw ntr is a outdated term...
I asked several platforms what "being gay" looks like in 2026 and what they think about it,and brace yourself...ITS really isn't gay. Why?
DocMedicus health lexicon
You are not gay because you practice or reject anal sex. Being gay means who you desire and love.
Sexual Orientation: Defined by whether one is romantically and sexually attracted to men, women, or both genders. It is not a conscious decision, but a deep-rooted feeling.
Lovelife.de
Sexual practice: Whether and how you have sex is an individual preference and has nothing to do with orientation. For example, anal sex is practiced by people of all sexual orientations.
In short, sexual orientation is not determined by what sexual acts someone does or doesn't do.
A man is gay if he is romantically or sexually attracted to men. He's not gay if he's not attracted to men - regardless of whether he's ever had anal sex.
A few examples:
A heterosexual man can have anal sex with a woman and remain heterosexual.
A gay man can never have had anal sex and still be gay.
Some men have sexual experiences with men without identifying as gay for a variety of reasons. Orientation is based on ongoing attraction, not a single action.
Therefore, not having cum in your own or someone else's ass says nothing about whether someone is gay or not. What matters is who you are romantically or sexually attracted to.
So, doing "gay stuff" in 2026 doesn't necessarily mean you're gay—provided you don't identify as gay yourself. For instance, there are gay men who define being gay based on things like keeping their socks on during sex or cum inside their partner. Ultimately, it depends on how you define being gay.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Legal Notice
This site provides links to other sites/services, and does not store any files