Often websites send UTC data from the server and convert it to user time zone client side, here instead seems to me that the user time zone is evaluated server side and sent as is.
This could explain your issue but it could depends on another bug, I don't know.
Yeah, but that can be frustrating if an action is ignored, for example I see that I have to stay on the same page for an amount of seconds and then the value is increased, but after then I have to move to another thread to increase the value again, casual user could not be aware of this...
It's a bit complex but more reasonable, what I can see there are two "bugs":
short_window -> there is a threshold that ignores short activity less than 60s I think
I don't understand when reading score is increased, because reading threads/pages doesn't increase the value, but somehow at some...
As I can see there is a big problem with active time that cannot be resolved, it records only movements, clicks, scrolls, etc... but the time spent reading or thinking about an answer are not stored, plus short movements are ignored if you are active for few seconds.
Seems to me that active...
Uhm... I don't like that, 72h like that will be an eternity, people will get married, old and rebirth before to reach that requirements, plus you are waste a lot efforts for a requirement that nobody will like and that will be ask to remove or reduce...
You should test it now, I don't know how it was in past, but now there is a post request each 10s to see if there are new notifications and as I can see there is no tracking of mouse movements and other things, which is fine, because I don't want be forced to see at a forum for 72 doing nothing
I doubt, you are confusing what you see (which is not updated until a refresh or a page load) with what is counted server side, as I can see the time online is not showed updated in real time but after a refresh: I left the tab open, done other things somewhere else and my online time increased...
You are right, anyway it shouldn't be a contradiction, F95 is terrorised to be the next forum closed due to loli, LC is accepting the risk but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be a more caution.
Thanks for this debate!
I know that people like this exist, but why the entire forum should be associated with them?
Yes, I can ignore what I don't like, but I can't ignore the fact that this is the 99% of the content of m+ and vip threads, that's create an environment where users must stay on public threads if they...