We need more human genetic experiments but too many are too afraid of ethical implications.
I want some Dinosaurs but make sure it is in another continent just in case something bad happens.
Also no flying or water base one just land dinos that won't cross to other continents.
I'd see genetic engineering to that degree as likely more of a when rather than an if, though. At least having the level of understanding to know how to do it.
Things didn't go well for Drs. Moreau and Mengele. Genetic engineering to that degree would be unethical and unnatural.
What is 'unethical' and what is 'unnatural'? If you have someone that is voluntarily doing it, is it unethical? Ethics are constantly evolving, and things considered unethical in the past, like organ transplants or pacemakers, are life-saving procedures, which is one of the main goals of genetic engineering. But our understanding of medical science, at least today, has also opened the door to safe and well-understood vanity procedures.
As for unnatural, that's honestly just a loaded but meaningless term that has been used as a vague buzzword for decades. By no means is the suggestion of genetic abuse being made, not to mention I believe modern medical science has moved beyond the need for human subjects for early-stage genetics research. AI modeling, engineered tissue systems, organoids, and whatever we may develop in the future have reduced the need for human involvement in pre-clinical testing. Human
volunteers only enter the equation during late-stage trials when safety surrounding the procedures is well understood. Calling something 'unnatural' is nothing more than a constantly shifting arbitrary label. Whether it's been vaccines, prosthetics, IVF, transplants, or blood transfusion (banned in England and France in 1668, by the way, for being 'unnatural and dangerous'), they've all been called unnatural throughout the years.
You should know I'm primarily left-handed. Am I unnatural? I would have been at one point in history. Are women wearing pants unnatural?
Where would we be today if we dismissed every single scientific breakthrough that is now commonplace today that detractors once called unnatural? The word is practically meaningless when used by ethical absolutists who move the goalpost with each coming decade.
Every Chrisitan, Jewish, and Islamic country in the world.
It's legal in 49 states in the U.S at least. I think it's only illegal in Idaho.